Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:58:21.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theological Discussion Group and Its Impact on American and Ecumenical Theology, 1920–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Heather A. Warren
Heather A. Warren
Affiliation:
Ms. Warren is assistant professor of religious studies in the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Discussion about theological developments in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s has focused on the influence of European “crisis theology” and Reinhold Niebuhr. This approach, however, has overlooked the cooperative work carried out by the theologians and churchmen who pushed American Protestant thought towards neo-orthodoxy. At the core of this movement stood a group of young theologians who shared a generational identity, having known each other as student leaders in the YMCA, Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (SVM), and the World's Student Christian Federation (WSCF). Among them were men and women who later held academic positions at America's most prestigious Protestant seminaries: Henry P. Van Dusen, John C. Bennett, the Niebuhr brothers, Walter M. Horton, Edwin E. Aubrey, Georgia Harkness, Robert L. Calhoun, John Mackay, Samuel McCrea Cavert, and the layman Francis P. Miller.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 528 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ahlstrom, Sydney E., A Religious History of the American People (New Haven, Conn., reprint 1973), pp. 932–948;Google ScholarFox, Richard Wrightman, “The Niebuhr Brothers and the Liberal Protestant Heritage,” in Religion and Twentieth-Century American Intellectual Life, ed. Lacey, Michael J. (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 94–115;Google ScholarMeyer, Donald, The Protestant Search for Political Realism, 1919–1941, 2nd ed. (Middletown, Conn., 1988);Google ScholarHutchison, William R., The Modernist Impulse in American Protestantism (Cambridge, Mass., 1976), pp. 288–311.Google ScholarThough Hutchison argued that neo-orthodox anthropology found its clearest expression in Niebuhr's writings, he acknowledged similar change in the thought of Niebuhr's peers, theologians such as John C. Bennett, Wilhelm Pauck, and Walter M. Horton.Google Scholar

2. Hutchison and Robert Schneider have both argued that to gain a clearer picture of American Protestantism in the twentieth century, historians must investigate the informal relationships among leaders as well as their work in churches, interdenominational organizations and conferences.Google ScholarHutchison, William R., “Protestantism as Establishment,” and Schneider, Robert A., “Voice of Many Waters: Church Federation in the Twentieth Century,” in Between the Times: The Travail of the Protestant Establishment in America, 1919–1939, ed. Hutchison, William R. (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 3–18, 95–121.Google Scholar

3. Scholars identify Reinhold Niebuhr, H. Richard Niebuhr, Francis P. Miller, Walter M. Horton as neo-orthodox, and Henry P. Van Dusen, John C. Bennett, and Georgia Harkness as neo-liberal.Google ScholarSee Fackre, Gabriel, “Theology: Ephemeral, Conjunctural, and Perennial,” in Altered Landscapes: Christianity in America, 1935–1985 (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1989), pp. 248–249;Google ScholarHutchison, , The Modernist Impulse, pp. 288–311;Google ScholarCauthen, Kenneth, The Impact of American Religious Liberalism (New York, 1962), pp. 228–255.Google ScholarAmerican neo-orthodox theologians who did not belong to this core group included Edwin Lewis of Drew University and George Richards of Lancaster Seminary. See Voskuil, Dennis, “Neo-Orthodoxy,” in Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience: Studies of Traditions and Movements, ed. Lippy, Charles H. and Williams, Peter W., 3 vols. (New York, 1988), 2: 1147–1157.Google Scholar

4. Hutchison, , The Modernist Impulse, pp. 185–225.Google Scholar

5. Wilder, Robert P., “A Retrospective—Five Year Report by the General Secretary to the Executive Committee [of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions],” 27 September 1924, Archives of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, MS. Group 42, Special Collections, Yale Divinity School Library (hereafter, SVM Archives).Google Scholar

6. Coe, George A., “New Social Horizons,” The Intercollegian 37:5 (02 1920): 3;Google Scholar“New Lessons in Democracy,” The Intercollegian 37:7 (04 1920): 2;Google Scholar“Student Volunteer Council Meets,” The Intercollegian 37:8 (05 1920): 9.Google ScholarThis fit a pattern described by Mannheim, Karl in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, ed. Kecskemeti, Paul (New York, 1952).Google Scholar

7. Hopkins, C. Howard, John R. Molt, 1865–1955: A Biography (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1979), p. 568.Google Scholar

8. Blanchard, Leslie, “Impressions of the Federation Meeting,” The Intercollegian 38:1 (10 1920): 4.Google Scholar

9. “Inter-racial Problems and Christian Duty—An Editorial,” The Student World 14:3 (07 1921): 109–113;Google Scholar“Public Announcements,” The Federation News Sheet no. 7 (10 1921);Google ScholarMiller, Francis, “The Task of Federation,” The Student World 16:1 (01 1923): 24–29.Google Scholar

10. Miller, Francis P., Man from the Valley, Memoirs of a 20th-century Virginian (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1971).Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 58.

12. “Editorial,” The Student World 14:3 (07 1922): 86.Google Scholar

13. Coston, Herbert Reece Jr, “The World's Student Christian Federation as an Ecumenical Training Ground” (Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 1963), pp. 1–110.Google Scholar

14. Cauthen, , The Impact of American Religious Liberalism, pp. 228–255;Google ScholarHutchison, , The Modernist Impulse, pp. 289–290;Google ScholarVoskuil, , “Neo-Orthodoxy,” pp. 1148, 1154–1155;Google ScholarBrown, William Adams, “The Homeless Liberal,” Religious Education 22:1 (01 1927): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Walter Horton to John C. Bennett, 11 November 1933, John C. Bennett Papers, “Correspondence,” Special Collections, The Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary (hereafter Bennett Correspondence); “Evanston,” The Intercollegian no. 5 (02 1926): 148, 150.Google Scholar

16. “News from the Field,” The Intercollegian 42:4 (01 1925): 141;Google Scholar“‘Eddy & Co.’ in the East,” The Intercollegian 42:5 (02 1925): 171;Google ScholarMiller, Francis P., ed., Religion on the Campus. Report of the Milwaukee National Student Conference (New York, 1927), pp. ix, 197–198.Google Scholar

17. Miller, Francis P., ed., The Church and the World (New York, 1926).Google Scholar

18. Van Dusen, Henry P., In Quest of Life's Meaning: Hints Toward a Christian Philosophy of Life for Students (New York, 1926).Google Scholar

19. “After Milwaukee—What?,” The Intercollegian 44:4 (01 1927): 98.Google Scholar

20. Niebuhr, Reinhold, Does Civilization Need Religion?: A Study in the Social Resource of Religion in Modern Life (New York, 1927; reprint 1928);Google ScholarFox, Richard Wightman, Reinhold Niebuhr: A Biography (San Francisco, 1985; reprint 1987), pp. 100–101.Google Scholar

21. Barth, Karl, “The Inward Man,” The Student World 21:3 (07 1928): 309–315.Google Scholar

22. Brunner, H. Emil, The Theology of Crisis (New York, 1930), pp. ix–x.Google Scholar

23. For example, Oldham, J. H., in “Review of Books,” International Review of Missions 19:74 (04 1930): 280;Google ScholarWilson, Jesse R., “Reviews,” Far Horizons 11:7 (04 1931): 31. Far Horizons was a new version of the Student Volunteer Movement Bulletin.Google Scholar

24. Niebuhr, Reinhold, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (New York, 1932; reprint 1960).Google Scholar

25. Van Dusen, Henry P., The Plain Man Seeks for God (New York, 1933).Google Scholar

26. Bennett, John C., “After Liberalism—What?,” The Christian Century 8 (8 11 1933): 1403–1406.Google Scholar

27. “German Protestantism Maintains Its Independence,” Federal Council Bulletin 16:6 (06 1933): 4–5;Google ScholarMaury, Pierre, The Student World 26:4 (10 1933): 363–367;Google Scholar“Federal Council Considers German Problems,” Federal Council Bulletin 16:9–10 (11–12 1933): 10;Google Scholar“Churches Support Protesting Group in Germany,” Federal Council Bulletin 17:3 (03 1934): 9.Google Scholar

28. “Proposed Conference—Retreats of Younger Christian Thinkers,” “Theological Discussion Group” notebooks, Van Dusen, Henry P. Papers, Special Collections, The Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary (hereafter Van Dusen Papers, TDG); Henry P. Van Dusen to John C. Bennett, 30 10 1933, Bennett Correspondence.Google Scholar

29. Wilhelm, and Pauck, Marion, Paul Tillich: His Life and Thought. Volume I: Life (New York, 1976) 1:186–190.Google Scholar

30. Van Dusen, Henry P. to the Members of the Retreat of February 2–4, 12 January 1934, Archives of the Theological Discussion Group, MS. Group 43, Special Collections, Yale Divinity School Library (hereafter TDG-YDS); agendas and records in Van Dusen Papers, TDG.Google Scholar

31. Van Dusen, Henry P. to Oldham, J. H., 9 03 1935, Archives of the World Council of Churches in Formation, “Life and Work,” Special Collections, The Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary (hereafter WCC-LW).Google ScholarFor more about the centrality of Van Dusen in the ecumenical movement see Thompson, Dean Keith, “Henry Pitney Van Dusen: Ecumenical Statesman” (Ph.D. diss., Union Theological Seminary in Richmond, 1974).Google Scholar

32. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Theological Discussion Group, 14 12 1935, Van Dusen Papers, TDG.Google Scholar

33. “Preparation for a World Conference on the Church, the State and the Community,” enclosed with Van Dusen, Henry P. to the Theological Discussion Group, 14 12 1935, Van Dusen Papers, TDG.Google Scholar

34. Calhoun, R.L., “Aspects of the Church's Thought about Man: A Historical Outline”;Google ScholarVlastos, Gregory, “A Brief Analysis of Human Nature”;Google ScholarNiebuhr, H. Richard, “Man the Sinner”;Google ScholarPauck, Wilhelm, “Man as Saved,” TDG-YDS;Google ScholarVan Dusen, Henry P. to J. H. Oldham, 13 02 1935, WCC-LW.Google Scholar

35. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Theological Discussion Group, 5 03 1935;Google ScholarVan Dusen, Henry P. to The Theological Discussion Group, 18 10 1935;Google ScholarHorton, Walter M., “Revelation”;Google ScholarBainton, Roland H., “Authority and Religious Knowledge”;Google ScholarMoore, John M., “Scientific Method and Religious Knowledge”;Google ScholarSteere, Douglas Van, “The Role of the Mystical Experience in Religion and Morality,” TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

36. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Members of the Theological Discussion Group, 11 12 1935;Google ScholarThomas, George F., “Can We Believe in Progress?”;Google ScholarMackay, John, “Historical and Superhistorical Elements in Christianity”;Google ScholarNiebuhr, H. Richard, “Reflections on the Christian Theory of History”;Google ScholarTillich, Paul, “The Marxist View of History,” TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

37. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Members of the Theological Discussion Group, 9 10 1935, TDG-YDS. Henry P. Van Dusen to J. H. Oldham, 15 10 1936, WCC-LW.Google ScholarPauck, Wilhelm, “The Church Idea in Christian History”;Google ScholarMcGregor, Daniel A., “The Holy Catholic Church”;Google ScholarMiller, Francis P., “The Church as World Community”;Google ScholarVan Dusen, Henry P., “The Church,” TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

38. Van Dusen, Henry P. to the Members of the Theological Discussion Group, 8 12 1936;Google ScholarCavert, Samuel McCrea, “Distinctive Issues in the Relation of the Church and State Arising from American History”;Google ScholarTillich, Paul, “What Strategy Should the Church Adopt with Reference to Communism?”;Google ScholarKruse, Cornelius, “What Strategy Should the Church Adopt with Reference to Fascism?”;Google ScholarHarkness, Georgia, “What Strategy Should the Church Adopt with Reference to Democracy?” TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

39. For more about Cavert's role in the formation of the World Council see: Schmidt, William J., Architect of Unity: A Biography of Samuel McCrea Cavert (New York, 1978).Google Scholar

40. Van Dusen, Henry P. to J. H. Oldham, 3 03 1937, WCC-LW.Google Scholar

41. Bennett, John C. to Henry P. Van Dusen, 20 03 1937, Archives of the World Council of Churches in Formation, “Correspondence of Henry P. Van Dusen,” Special Collections, The Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary (hereafter WCC-HPVD).Google Scholar

42. “Additional Report of the Section on Church and Community,” The Oxford Conference (Official Report) (Chicago, 1937), pp. 180–181, 192–193.Google Scholar

43. See the essays by these contributors in the preparatory study volumes: The Universal Church and the World of Nations, Church and Community, The Christian Faith and the Common Life, The Christian Understanding of Man, and The Kingdom of God and History (London, 1937).Google Scholar

44. “A Message from the Oxford Conference to the Christian Churches,” The Oxford Conference (Official Report), p. 47.Google Scholar

45. Secretary's Report for the Period August, 1939—October, 1941 (Washington, and Connecticut: the Secretary, 1941), Pamphlet no. 96, Series 1, pp. 3, 7–8;Google ScholarReport of the American Section of the Commission on Intercommunion (Washington, Connecticut,: Office of the Associate Secretary for America, 1942), Pamphlet no. 98, Series 1;Google ScholarSecretary's Report, 1942–43 (11 1943), Pamphlet no. 97, Series 1, 3.Google Scholar

46. “The ‘Life and Work’ Study Program,” Christendom 9:2 (Spring 1944): 310–;Google ScholarGaines, David P., The World Council of Churches: A Study of Its Background and History (Peterborough, N.H., 1966), p. 179.Google Scholar

47. Bennett, John C. to Collaborators for the Study Department in the United States, 6 03 1940, WCC-HPVD.Google Scholar

48. Bennett, John C., “Results of an Ecumenical Study,” Christendom 9:2 (Spring 1944): 142.Google Scholar

49. Bennett, John C. to those who received the Chicago memorandum, n.d., attached to Bennett, John C. to Prof. Brightman, E. S., 24 04 1941, WCC-HPVD.Google Scholar

50. Ibid.; Bennett, John C., “The Study Committee at Toronto,” Christendom 6:4 (Autumn 1940): 633;Google ScholarBennett, John C., “Results of an Ecumenical Study,” pp. 143–144;Google ScholarThomas, George F., “Corpus Christi and Corpus Christianum,” Christendom 7:1 (Winter 1942): 24–34.Google Scholar

51. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Members of the Theological Discussion Group, 15 04 1941, TDG-YDS;Google ScholarTillich, Paul J., Greene, Theodore M., Thomas, George F., Aubrey, Edwin E., and Knox, John, The Christian Answer, edited with an introduction by Van Dusen, Henry P. (New York, 1945), p. viii.Google Scholar

52. “Theological Discussion Group, Proposed Program for the year [sic] 1942–1943,” TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

53. “The Relation of the Church to War,” Federal Council Bulletin 26:4 (05 1943): 12.Google Scholar

54. Cavert, Samuel McCrea to Bennett, John C., 11 02 1943, Bennett Correspondence;Google ScholarAubrey, Edwin E. to Members of Section 1 of the Commission on “The Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of the Christian Faith,” undated, Bennett Correspondence.Google Scholar

55. Theological Discussion Group members who belonged to the commission were: Edwin E. Aubrey, Roland Bainton, John C. Bennett, Harvie Branscomb, Angus Dun, Theodore M. Greene, Georgia Harkness, Walter M. Horton, John Knox, John A. Mackay, Benjamin E. Mays, Reinhold Niebuhr, H. Richard Niebuhr, Wilhelm Pauck, Douglas Steere, Henry P. Van Dusen, and Alexander Zabriskie. Known active members of the TDG not included in the committee were: Seelye Bixler, Virginia Corwin, Cornelius Kruse, Daniel A. McGregor, Francis P. Miller, John M. Moore, George Thomas, and Paul Tillich.Google Scholar

56. See Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology, 3 vols. (Chicago, 1951), 1:8, '30–31, 34, 59–66.Google Scholar

57. “Theological Discussion Group, Proposed Program for the year [sic] 1942–43,” TDGYDS.Google Scholar

58. Calhoun, Robert L. to Bennett, John C., 13 05 1943, Bennett Correspondence.Google Scholar

59. Van Dusen, Henry P. to The Theological Discussion Group, n.d.;Google ScholarFerré, Nels F. S., “The Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of the Christian Faith”;Google ScholarKnox, John, “War as Seen from the Point of View of the Christian Faith”;Google ScholarVan Dusen, Henry P., “The Christian Faith and War,” 10 1943, TDG-YDS.Google Scholar

60. “The Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of the Christian Faith,” Social Action 10:10 (10 1944): 3–79.Google Scholar

61. Ibid., p. 22.

62. Ibid., p. 29.

63. Ibid., p. 27.

64. Ibid., pp. 27–28.

65. Ibid., p. 28.

66. Ibid., p. 47.

67. Ibid., p. 57.

68. Ibid., pp. 59–60; Bennett, John C., “In Such a Time,” Christendom 7:2 (Spring 1942): 162.Google Scholar

69. “The Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of the Christian Faith,” Social Action 10:10 (12 1944): 75–79.Google Scholar

70. “Historical Review of Church and War,” Federal Council Bulletin 28:2 (02 1945): 8.Google Scholar

71. “Appendix—The Relation of the Church to the War in Light of the Christian Faith, Part II, Sections B, C, and D of the Calhoun Report to the Federal Council of Churches, November, 1944,” Christendom 10:2 (Spring 1945): 263–284.Google Scholar

72. “The Church and the War,” Christianity and Crisis 4:22 (25 12 1944): 5.Google Scholar

73. Creeds of the Church: A Reader in Christian Doctrine from the Bible to the Present, 3rd ed., ed. Leith, John H. (Atlanta, 1962; reprint 1982), p. 523.Google Scholar

74. Tillich, et. al., The Christian Answer.Google Scholar

75. Ibid., p. viii.