Article contents
The Theological Basis of Digger Communism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
The Diggers who broke the turf on St. George's Hill Sunday morning, April 1, 1649, have an importance far larger than the number of people involved would suggest, for their action was the first effort to bring into being a socialist Utopia. Their bold combination of theoretical and practical communism baffled their contemporaries, and historians ever since have failed to see them in the totality of their meaning.*** Were they simply hungry men, agrarian revolutionaries filing one more protest against economic and social injustice? Or were they religiously inspired men who used the most dramatic means at their disposal to portray the sinfulness of man and the possibility of redemption? The ambiguity of the Digger experiment has lent color to both explanations.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1954
References
1. Tawney, R. H., Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (New York, 1947 ed.), pp. 211–12.Google Scholar
2. Gooch, G. P., English Democratic Ideas in the Seventeenth Century (2d ed., London, 1927), p. 180.Google Scholar
3. Cromwell and Communism, tr. H. J. Stenning (London, 1930), p. 107.Google Scholar
4. Left-Wing Democracy in the English Civil War (London, 1940) p. 178.Google Scholar
5. Strachey, John, The Theory and Practice of Socialism (New York, 1936), p. 296.Google Scholar
6. “The Apple that the first man eats, is not a single fruit called an Apple, or such like fruit; but it is the objects of the Creation” (The New Law of Righteousness [1649] in The Works of Gerrard Winstanley, ed. George H. Sabine [Ithaca, New York, 1941], pp. 177, 182).Google Scholar
7. Ibid., p. 177.
8. New Law, Works, p. 210.
9. Fire in the Bush (1650), Works, p. 489.Google Scholar
10. An Humble Request (1650), Works, p. 242.Google Scholar
11. New Law, Works, p. 194.
12. Truth Lifting up its Head, Works, p. 113.
13. New Law, Works, p. 149. The reference is to Matt. XIII:44.
14. Ibid., p. 205.
15. The True Levellers Standard, Works, p. 251.
16. Troeltsch, Ernest, The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, tr. Wyon, Olive (New York, 1931), II, 956,Google Scholar n.456.
17. Fire in the Bush, Works, p. 452.
18. James, Margaret, Social Problems and Policy during the Puritan Revolution, 1640–1660 (London, 1930), p. 103.Google Scholar
19. The Breaking of the Day of God (1648), Works, p.90.
20. Holdsworth, W. S., An Historical Introduction to the Land Law (Oxford, 1927), p. 94.Google Scholar
21. “The Literature of the Diggers,” University of Toronto Quarterly, XII (1942), 315.Google Scholar
22. Sabine, George H., Works… Winstanley, p. 3.Google Scholar
23. Watch-Word to the City of London (1649), Works, p. 329. See also New Law, Works, p. 204.
24. Piers Plowman, XXII, 274–75.Google Scholar
25. Milton in the Puritan Revolution (New York, 1941), pp. 314–15.Google Scholar
26. Acts II:44–45.
27. Fieldus, Jo., “A Briefe Confession of Faythe,” (1572), in The Seconde Parte of a Register, ed. Albert, Peel (Cambridge, 1915), I, 87.Google Scholar
28. Cited by Wolfe, , Milton in the Puritan Revolution, p. 318.Google Scholar
29. New Law, Works, p. 153. See also pp. 182 and 205.
30. Hudson, Winthrop S., “Gerrard WinStanley and the Early Quakers,” Church History, XII (1943), 194.Google Scholar
31. Cromwell and Communism, p. 69.
32. New Law, Works, p. 215.
33. Propositions, Part IV, p. 26.
34. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, p. 14.
35. Theory and Practice of Socialism, p. 298.
36. Troeltsch, , Social Teaching, II, 712Google Scholar; see also Hudson, “Gerrard Winstanley and the Early Quakers,” pp. 177 ff. However, Jones, Rufus M. says that “the contrasts between Winstanley and Foxe are fully as marked as the similarities” (Studies in Mystical Religion, [New York, 1909], p. 495).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by