Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:06:42.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religion and the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Malcolm R. Thorp
Affiliation:
assoctate professor of history inBrigham Young University, Provo, Utah

Extract

In his book Two Tudor Conspiracies, D. M. Loades challenged the traditional view among historians that the Wyatt rebellion was influenced by Protestant concerns over the Catholic policies of Mary Tudor. In Loades' account of the event, religion played no prominent part; the conspirators were secular and anti-clerical, but otherwise their religious convictions remain “shadowy.” Loades contends that apart from William Thomas, the well-known Protestant enthusiast, “all had conformed without protest under Edward, and those still alive were to do so again under Elizabeth, but throughout the period of the rebellion and trials which followed it, all protested their loyalty to the Catholic Church.” The real reasons for the revolt, he asserts, were secular and political—namely, fear of foreign domination through the Queen's intended marriage to Philip of Spain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Loades, D. M., Two Tudor Conspiracies (Cambridge, 1965)Google Scholar and his more recent books: The Oxford Martyrs (New York, 1970), pp. 123124Google Scholar; Politics and the Nation 1450–1660 (London and Glasgow, 1974), pp. 226232, 236.Google Scholar

2. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 16.Google Scholar

3. Ibid., p. 88.

4. Reviews by Williams, in English Historical Review 82 (01, 1967): 159160CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Rabb, in American Historical Review 71 (07, 1966): 13251326CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Ferguson, in Journal of Modern history 39 (03, 1967): 172173CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Supporters of Loades' thesis include Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation (New York, 1964), p. 261Google Scholar;, Pill, David, The English Reformation 1529–58 (London, 1973), p. 178Google Scholar; and Elton, G. R., Reform and Reformation (London, 1977), pp. 380382.Google Scholar

5. Slavin, A. J., The Precarious Balance (New York, 1973), p. 192.Google Scholar

6. Russell, Conrad, The Crisis of Parliaments (London and New York, 1971), p. 139Google Scholar. See also D. M. Pallister, “Popular Reactions to the Reformation During the Years of Uncertainty,”in Heal, Felicity and O'Day, Rosemary, eds., Church and Society in England: Henry VIII to James I (London, 1977), p. 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Fletcher, Anthony, Tudor Rebellions (London, 1968), p. 87Google Scholar. A similar interpretation is Jones, Whitney R. D., The Mid-Tudor Crisis (New York, 1973), pp. 9495.Google Scholar

8. There were no less than five different changes of the established religion during this period. Yet, by Edward's reign, doctrinal differences separating Catholic and Protestant were carefully demarcated in official government pronouncements on matters of faith. Cardinal Catholic doctrines, such as purgatory and prayers for the dead, the use of images, clerical celibacy and Catholic priesthood all were denied, and such Protestant doctrines as justification by faith, predestination and the correct form of church service emphatically were proclaimed. It will be argued here that the Wyatt conspirators tended to be staunch supporters of the religious policies of the Edwardian regime. For Protestantism under Edward, see Haigh, Christopher, Reformation and Resistance in Tudor Lancashire (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 139177Google Scholar; Jordan, W. K., Edward VI: The Threshold of Power (London, 1970), pp. 3624011Google Scholar; and Davies, Horton, Worship and Theology in England, 1534–1603 (Princeton, 1970), pp. 339.Google Scholar

9. Pill, David, The English Reformation, pp. 166167.Google Scholar

10. Ibid., p. 168; Hughes, Philip, The Reformation in England (London, 1954) 2:195Google Scholar; Maclure, Millar, The Paul's Cross Sermons (Toronto, 1958), p. 50.Google Scholar

11. Hughes, Paul L. and Larkin, James F., eds., Tudor Royal Proclamations II (New Haven and London, 1969), pp. 6768.Google Scholar

12. Pill, , The English Reformation, p. 168.Google Scholar

13. Hughes, , The Reformation 2:196Google Scholar; Brooks, Peter, Thomas Crammer's Doctrine of the Eucharist (New York, 1965), pp. 72111, and especially p. 77, n. 3Google Scholar; Loades, , Oxford Martyrs, pp. 117118.Google Scholar

14. The Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, ed. John Gough Nichols, Camden Society, Old Series, Vol. 48 (London, 1850), p. 33.Google Scholar

15. Muller, James A., Stephen Gardiner and the Tudor Reaction (New York, 1926), p. 243.Google Scholar

16. Garrett, Christina, The Marian Exiles (Cambridge, 1938), p. 3.Google Scholar

17. Holinshed, Raphael, Chronicles, (London, 1808), 4:36.Google Scholar

18. Calendar of Slate Papers, Spanish, Edward VI and Mary, 1553 (London, 1916) 2:472Google Scholar (hereafter, C.S.P., Spanish); Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 22.Google Scholar

19. Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Philip and Mary, Vol 2, 1554–1555 (London, 1936), pp. 47; 124125; 177; 201202; 293Google Scholar; Harbison, E. Harrison, Rival Ambassadors at the Court of Queen Mary (Princeton, 1940), p. 111, n. 6Google Scholar; Loades, , Conspiracies, pp. 1516.Google Scholar

20. Pollard, A. F., The History of England, 1547–1603 (London, 1910), pp. 107108Google Scholar; Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, pp. 112113.Google Scholar

21. Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, p. 111.Google Scholar

22. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 79.Google Scholar

23. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554 12:42.Google Scholar

24. See P. 9.

25. Dictionary of National Biography (hereafter D.N.B.) (London, 1921) 4:1261Google Scholars.v. “Edward Courtenay.” See Courtenay, Edward, Earl of Devonshire, A Treatise… of the Benefit that True Christians Receive by the Death of Jesus Christ, in Babington, Churchill, ed., The Benefit of Christ's Death… (London and Cambridge, 1855)Google Scholar. Undoubtedly the pamphlet's advocacy of predestination (pp. 177–178) accounts for its appeal to Protestants.

26. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, 12:108.Google Scholar

27. MacCaffrey, Wallace, The Shaping of the Elizabethan Regime (Princeton, 1968), p. 445Google Scholar. In Elizabeth's reign Croft spoke out against the Puritans, which is an indication of his moderation on religion. Neale, J. E., Elizabeth l and Her Parliaments, 1559–1581 (New York, 1966), pp. 199, 202.Google Scholar

28. Among his instructions from the Privy Council is the admonition that religion was to be “cherished.” C.S.P., Ireland, 1509–1573, p. 117.Google Scholar

29. Calendar of the Carew Manuscripts, 1515–1574, (London, 1867) pp. 226, 231Google Scholar; Bagwell, Richard, Ireland Under the Tudors (London, 1963), 1:360.Google Scholar

30. Bagwell, , Ireland pp. 365368Google Scholar

31. Mant, Richard, History of the Church of Ireland (London, 1840), 1:209210.Google Scholar

32. Portland Papers, PWV83, University of Nottingham Library, Nottingham, Eng., no foliation; Ham, R. E., “The Autobiography of Sir James Croft,” Bulleltn of the Institute of Historical Research 50 (05, 1977):4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Adair, E. R., “William Thomas: A Forgotten Clerk of the Privy Council,”in Seton-Watson, R. W., ed., Tudor Studies (New York, 1970), pp. 135, 138, 147.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., p. 147; Narratives of the Reformation, “Autobiography of Thomas Hancock,” Camden Society, Old Series, Vol. 77 (London, 1859), p. 83.Google Scholar

35. Rowse, A. L., Ralegh and the Throckmortons (London, 1962), pp. 11, 14, 18, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward VI, Vol. 3 (London, 1925), p. 137Google Scholar. Strype, John, Ecclesiastical Memorials, 2, pt. 2:164.Google Scholar

37. Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, pp. 12–13.

38. Nichols, John Gough, ed., The Legend of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton (London, 1874), p. 29.Google Scholar

39. Holinshed, , Chronicles, 4:42.Google Scholar

40. C.S.P., Spanish, 1558–1567, p. 37.Google Scholar

41. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 39.Google Scholar

42. The Carews were among the leading Protestants of the county. See Hoskins, W. G., Devon (London, 1959), pp. 283, 427.Google Scholar

43. Hooker, J., The Life… of Sir P. Carew (London, 1857), pp. 111112.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 111; Rose-Troup, Frances, The Western Rebellion of 1549 (London, 1913), p. 107Google Scholar; Polwhele, Richard, The History of Devonshire (London, 1747), pp. 290291.Google Scholar

45. Hooker, , Life, p. 111.Google Scholar

46. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, p. 16.Google Scholar

47. C.S.P., Domestic, 1547–1580, p. 72.Google Scholar

48. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 107.Google Scholar

49. Strype, John, Ecclesiastical Memorials, (London: 1731) 3:95.Google Scholar

50. Original Letters Relative to the Reformation Vol. 1, ed. Hastings Robinson (Cambridge, 1842), p. 3Google Scholar; D.N.B. 8:629, s.v. “Henry Grey.”

51. Memoirs and Remaini of Lady Jane Grey ed. Harns Nichols (London, 1831), p.xxiiGoogle Scholar; Mathew, David, Lady Jane Grey (London, 1972), p. 132.Google Scholar

52. C.S.P., Spanish, 1553, p. 332.Google Scholar

53. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, p. 125.Google Scholar

54. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 17.Google Scholar

55. C.S.P., Spanish, 1550–1552, p. 218.Google Scholar

56. C.S.P., Foreign, 1547–1553, ed. William B. Turnbill (London, 1861) pp. 176–77.Google Scholar

57. Ibid., p. 250.

58. The Zurich Letters, Cormprising the Correspondence of Several English Bishops and others, with Some Helvetian Reformers, during the Early Part of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, ed. Hastings Robinson, Vol. 1, 1st Ser. (Cambridge, 1842), p. 34.Google Scholar

59. Strype, John, The Life of John cheke in Works (Oxford, 1822), p. 951Google Scholar; Garrett, , Marion Exiles, pp. 272273Google Scholar; D.N.B., 17:118Google Scholar, s.v. “Sir Edward Rogers.”

60. Camden, William, The Historie of the Most Renowned and Victorious Princesse Elizabeth (London, 1630), pp. 1213.Google Scholar

61. D.N.B., 22:75, s.v. “Sir Nicholas Arnold.”

62. Letters and Papers of henry VIII, ed. James Gairdner (London, 1890) 12(1):831Google Scholar; Powell, K. G., “The Social Background to the Reformation in Gloucestershire,” Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 92 (1973):116.Google Scholar

63. Ibid., p. 118.

64. Proctor, John, The History of Wyats Rebellion, in Tudor Tracts, ed. Pollard, A. F. (London, 1903), pp. 201257.Google Scholar

65. The Papers of George Wyatt, ed. D. M. Loades (London, 1968), pp. 181205.Google Scholar

66. Ibid., pp. 181–182.

67. Ibid., p. 181.

68. Ibid., pp. 200–201.

69. Loades, , Conspiracies, pp. 1617.Google Scholar

70. Thomson, Patricia, Sir Thomas Wyatt and His Background (Stanford, California, 1964), pp. 6269.Google Scholar

71. Hasted, Edward, A History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent (Canterbury, 1797) 4:451Google Scholar; Fuller, Thomas, The History of the Worthies of England, ed. Nuttall, P. Austin (London, 1840) 2:152.Google Scholar

72. Original Letters Relative to English Reformation 1:3637.Google Scholar

73. The Papers of George Wyatt, p. 9.

74. Thomson, , Wyatt, p. 74.Google Scholar

75. The Papers of George Wyatt, p. 165.

76. Ibid., pp. 167–168.

77. Ibid., p. 168.

78. Ibid., p. 167.

79. Ibid., p. 165.

80. Ibid., p. 164–165; Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 50.Google Scholar

81. Quoted in Lehmberg, Stanford E., Sir Walter Midmay (Austin, Texas, 1954), p. 40.Google Scholar

82. Holinshed, , Chronicles 4:42.Google Scholar

83. Neale, , Parliaments 1:148Google Scholar; Russell, , Crisis of Parliaments, p. 138.Google Scholar

84. Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, p. 126.Google Scholar

85. For factual detail, Loades' account is superior to all others. Conspiracies, pp. 25–88. See also Muller, , Stephen Gardiner, pp. 236244Google Scholar; Prescott, , Spanish Tudor, pp. 287313.Google Scholar

86. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 34.Google Scholar

87. Ibid., p. 40; C.S.P., Spanish 12:82.Google Scholar

88. Proctor, , Historie, pp. 212213Google Scholar; Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, p. 36.

89. C.S.P., Spanish, 12:79.Google Scholar

90. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 65.Google Scholar

91. Foxe, John, Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, ed. Cattley, Stephen Reed (London, 1837) 6:414415.Google Scholar

92. Ibid., p. 413.

93. Proctor, , Historie, p. 210.Google Scholar

94. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 55.Google Scholar

95. The government's counter-propaganda emphasized that Wyatt was a religious extremist in order to discredit him with the populace. The effectiveness of this approach suggests that Wyatt was wise in not stressing religion, but in attempting to appear as a leader aiming at removing “evil councilors” and prohibiting the entrance of Spaniards. For governmental propaganda, see C.S.P., Spanish, 0107 1554, pp. 55, 78Google Scholar, and the Queen's speech of 1 February, printed in Foxe, , Acts and Monuments 6:414.Google Scholar

96. Stow, John, Annals (London, 1631), p. 620Google Scholar; Garrett, , Marian Exiles, p. 254Google Scholar; Hudson, Winthrop S., John Ponet (Chicago, 1942), pp. 6465.Google Scholar

97. The Sermons of Edwin Sandys, ed. John Ayre (Cambridge, 1841), p. ix.Google Scholar

98. Loades construes this to mean that Protestant leaders were estranged from Wyatt's cause. (Conspiracies, p. 87.) In The Oxford Martyrs (pp. 116–117), however, he suggests that failure to rebel involved commitment to lawful authority: this was undoubtedly a powerful motive whether or not Protestants harbored sympathies for Wyatt.

99. Fletcher, , Tudor Rebellion, p. 90Google Scholar. Another example contrary to Loades' thesis is that of Sir William Pelham, a Protestant gentleman from East Sussex. See Manning, Roger B., Religion and Society in Elizabethan Sussex (Leicester, 1969), p. 264.Google Scholar

100. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 87.Google Scholar

101. According to the list printed in Maitland, S. R., The Reformation in England (London, 1904)Google Scholar, there were three men burned at Rochester, two at Maidstone, and two at Ashford. It is generally agreed that there were fifty-eight burnings in Kent, of which thirty-nine were men. For a discussion of the Marian martyrs, see Dickens, , The English Reformation, pp. 264272.Google Scholar

102. Loades, , Two Tudor Conspiracies, pp. 8788.Google Scholar

103. Cox, J. C., Churchwarden's Accounts (London, 1913), pp. 314Google Scholar; Campbell, Mildred, The English Yeuman (London, 1960), pp. 325331.Google Scholar

104. C.S.P., , Venetian, 1534–1554, p. 560Google Scholar; de Noailles, Messieurs, Ambasades en Angleterre, ed. de Vertot, R. A. and Villaret, C. (Leyden, 1763) 3:16, 22.Google Scholar

105. See Wiatt, William H., “The Lost History of Wyatt's Rebellion,” Renaissance News, 15 (Summer, 1962): 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A similar explanation was offered by Christopherson, John, An Exortation to Alle Menne to Take Hede and Beward of Rebellion (London, 1554), no pagination.Google Scholar

106. Holished, , Chronicles 4:11Google Scholar; Stow, JohnAnnales (London, 1631), p. 613.Google Scholar

107. Elton, G. R., England Under the Tudors (London, 1955), pp. 420421.Google Scholar

108. Prescott, , A Spanish Tudor, p. 282.Google Scholar

109. Muller, , Stephen Gardiner, p. 239.Google Scholar

110. Bradford, John, The Copye of a letter, sent by John Bradforth to the Erles of Arundel, Darbie, Shrewburye and Pembroke, declaring the nature of the Spaniards… (N.P., n.d. [1556]).Google Scholar

111. Maltby, William S., The Black Legend in England (Durham, NC., 1971), p. 29.Google Scholar

112. Ponet, John, A Short Treatise of Politike Power, printed in Hudson, Ponet, pp. 9394, 122.Google Scholar

113. Ibid., pp. 165–167.

114. Goodman, Christopher, How Superior Powers Ought to be Obeyed (Geneva, 1558), p. 118.Google Scholar

115. Ibid., pp. 135, 209–13; The Writings of John Bradford, ed. Aubrey Townsend (Cambridge, 1848), pp. 425, 428.Google Scholar

116. Holinshed, , Chronicles 9:41.Google Scholar