No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Teaching the History of Christianity: Traditions and Presuppositions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
In his presidential address to the American Society of Church History in 1920, Robert Hastings Nichols observed that he had discovered, in his reading of previous addresses, “no mention of the reading of a paper dealing with what is the occupation of almost half of our members, the teaching of Church History,” or, as he preferred to call it, the teaching of “Christianity in History.” He decided, therefore, to talk about pedagogy. He devoted most of his address to answering the question why history should be taught in the theological seminary, arguing that it trained students to weigh evidence, calculate motives, trace causes, and estimate the power of social movements. It nurtured a certain kind of intellectual and moral capacity.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 2003
References
1. Nichols, Robert Hastings, “Aims and Methods of Teaching Church History” (1920), Papers of the American Society of Church History, 2nd ser., vol. 7 (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1923), 39, 40, 42.Google Scholar
2. Rudolph, Frederick, Curriculum: A History of the American Undergraduate Course of Study Since 1636 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977), 177Google Scholar; Hamerow, Theodore S., “The Professionalization of Historical Learning,” Reviews in American History 14 (09., 1986): 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rudolph, , Curriculum, 47Google Scholar; Warch, Richard, School of the Prophets: Yale College, 1701–1740 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1973), 191–95Google Scholar; Fisher, John Alonzo, “A Select Bibliography of Ecclesiastical History,” Methods of Teaching History, ed. Hall, G. Stanley, 2nd ed. (1st ed., 1883; Boston: D. C. Heath, 1884), 343–85Google Scholar; Adams, Herbert Baxter, “The Teaching of History,” Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1897 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1898), 251Google Scholar, as cited in Bowden, Henry Warner, Church History in the Age of Science: Historiographical Patterns in the United States 1876–1918 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1971), 26Google Scholar; Deus Lux Mea: Solemnities of the Dedication and Opening of the Catholic University of America, November 13, 1889 (Baltimore: John Murphy, 1890), 80Google Scholar; Nuesse, C. Joseph, The Catholic University of America: A Centennial History (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1990), 114.Google Scholar
4. White, Joseph M., The Diocesan Seminary in the United States: A History from the 1780s to the Present (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989), 141.Google Scholar
5. Thompson, J. Earl Jr., “Church History Comes to Andover: The Persecution of James Murdock,” Andover Newton Quarterly 15 (03 1985): 214.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., 220, 222–23.
7. Ibid., 226.
8. Miller, Samuel, The Life of Samuel Miller, 2 vols. (Philadelphia: Faxton, Remsen, and Haffelfinger, 1869), 2:Part III:9Google Scholar; Wright, Conrad, “The Early Period (1811–40), The Harvard Divinity School: Its Place in Harvard University and in American Culture, ed. Williams, George Huntston (Boston: Beacon, 1954), 53Google Scholar; Dawley, Powell Mills, The Story of General Theological Seminary (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), 44Google Scholar; Wayland, John T., The Theological Department in Yale College 1822–1858 (New York: Garland, 1987), 178.Google Scholar
9. Handy, Robert T., A History of Union Theological Seminary in New York (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), 40Google Scholar; Smyth, Egbert C., Value of the Study of Church History in Ministerial Education: A Lecture Delivered to the Senior Class of Andover Theological Seminary (Andover: Warren F. Draper, 1874), 5.Google Scholar
10. Smith, Henry Boynton, Nature and Worth of the Science of Church History: An Inaugural Address Delivered Before the Directors of the Union Theological Seminary, New York, Feb. 12, 1851 (Andover: Warren F. Draper, 1851), 5.Google Scholar
11. Wayland, Francis and Wayland, H. L., A Memoir of the Life and Labors of Francis Wayland, 2 vols. (1st ed., 1867; New York: Arno, 1972), 2:225–26, 233.Google Scholar
12. Rosell, Garth M., “A Speckled Bird: Charles G. Finney's Contribution to Higher Education,” Fides et Historia 25 (1993): 58–59Google Scholar; Rudolph, , Curriculum, 69.Google Scholar
13. Rudolph, , Curriculum, 79Google Scholar; Miller, , Life of Samuel Miller, 2:404.Google Scholar
14. Dawley, , Story of General Theological Seminary, 22Google Scholar; White, , Diocesan Seminary, 141Google Scholar; Ellis, John Tracy, Essays in Seminary Education (Notre Dame, Ind.: Fides, 1967), 145, 242.Google Scholar
15. Chandler, Douglas R. and Goen, C. C., Pilgrimage of Faith: A Centennial History of Wesley Theological Seminary 1882–1982 (Washington, D.C.: Seven Lochs, 1984), 26Google Scholar; White, , Diocesan Seminary, 258. Westminster moved to Washington, D.C. in 1958, when it was renamed as Wesley Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
16. Yates, Frances A., The Art of Memory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966), 1–27, 129–60, 199–243Google Scholar; Menard, Pierre, “The Pedagogy of Johann Sturm (1507–1589) and its Evangelical Inspiration,” Studies in the Renaissance 13 (1966): 210Google Scholar; Wittrock, M. C., “Knowledge Acquisition and Comprehension,” Encyclopedia of Educational Research, 6th ed., 4 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 2:699–700Google Scholar; Caruthers, Mary J., The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 114, 82Google Scholar; Hall, David D., Cultures of Print: Essays in the History of the Book (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1996), 59Google Scholar; Parkerson, Donald H. and Parkerson, JoAnn, Transitions in American Education: A Social History of Teaching (New York: Routledge Falmer, 2001), 98.Google Scholar
17. Russell, William, “Cultivation of the Reflective Faculties,” American Journal of Education 4 (1857): 201Google Scholar; Anon., “Sketches of Hofwyl,” American Annals of Education and Instruction 2 (1832): 15, 497–508.Google Scholar
18. Russell, , “Cultivation of the Reflective Faculties,” 201.Google Scholar
19. Burgess, John W., “The Methods of Historical Study and Research in Columbia College,” Methods of Teaching History, 218.Google Scholar
20. Wayland, , Theological Department, 176.Google Scholar
21. “Fifty-Third Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York” (1839), 107, in Callcott, George H., “History Enters the Schools,” American Quarterly 11 (1959): 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Johnson, Thomas Cary, The Life and Letters of Benjamin Morgan Palmer (Richmond, Va.: Presbyterian Committee of Publication, 1906), 154, 162.Google Scholar
23. Schaf, David S., The Life of Philip Schaff (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1897), 126Google Scholar; Kremer, Abner, “Memories of Dr. Philip Schaff at Mercersburg,” Reformed Church Messenger, 85 (11 16, 1916): 8Google Scholar; Pranger, Gary K., Philip Schaff (1819–1893): Portrait of an Immigrant Theologian (New York: Peter Lang, 1997), 76Google Scholar; Shriver, George H., “Philip Schaff as Teacher of Church History,” Journal of Presbyterian History 47 (1969): 79.Google Scholar
24. Miller, , Life of Samuel Miller, 2:403Google Scholar; Henry, Hugh T., “A New Method of Teaching History,” American Ecclesiastical Review 19 (1898): 471, 477.Google Scholar
25. French, F. C., “Lectures Versus Recitations,” Educational Review 23 (1902): 345–46Google Scholar; Adams, Herbert Baxter, “Special Methods of Historical Study,” Methods of Teaching History, 117, 120Google Scholar; De Garno, Charles, “The Lecture System in University Teaching,” Educational Review 23 (1902): 111.Google Scholar
26. De, Garno, “Lecture System,” 111.Google Scholar
27. Emerton, Ephraim, “The Practical Method in Higher Historical Instruction,” Methods of Teaching History, 32, 35.Google Scholar
28. Bowden, , Church History in the Age of Science, 97Google Scholar; Scott, Henry E., “The Courses of Study in History, Roman Law, and Political Economy at Harvard University,” Methods of Teaching History, 179Google Scholar; Emerton, “Practical Method,” ibid., 31–36.
29. Burgess, , “Methods of Historical Study,” Methods of Teaching History, 218.Google Scholar
30. Haines, Deborah L., “Scientific History as a Teaching Method: The Formative Years,” Journal of American History 63 (1977): 909CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bowden, , Church History in the Age of Science, 101.Google Scholar
31. “Adams, Charles K. to Adams, Herbert B., 9 02 1886,” Historical Scholarship in the United States 1867–1901: As Revealed in the Correspondence of Herbert B. Adams (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1938), 79Google Scholar; Bowden, , Church History in the Age of Science, 12Google Scholar; Rosell, , “A Speckled Bird,” 62Google Scholar; Emerton, , “Practical Method,” Methods of Teaching History, 39.Google Scholar
32. Haines, , “Scientific History as a Teaching Method,” 895, 897.Google Scholar
33. Rauschenbusch, Walter, “The Influence of Historical Studies on Theology,” American Journal of Theology 11 (1907): 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Emerton, , “Practical Method,” Methods of Teaching History, 38.Google Scholar
34. Emerton, Ephraim, “A Definition of Church History,” in Papers of the American Society of Church History, ed. Loetscher, 59, 61.Google Scholar
35. Smyth, , “Value of the Study of Church History,” 28.Google Scholar
36. Robinson, James Harvey, “Teaching European History in College,” Educational Review 15 (1898): 33.Google Scholar
37. Emerton, , “Practical Method,” Methods of Teaching History, 41.Google Scholar
38. Adams, Charles K., A Manual of Historical Literature (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1882), 7Google Scholar, cited in Bowden, , Church History in the Age of Science, 23.Google Scholar