Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:45:53.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Michel Foucault, Lust, Women, and Sin in Louis XIV's Paris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Philip F. Riley
Philip F. Riley
Affiliation:
Professor of history in James Madison University, Harrison burg, Virginia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1984, the year of his death, a veritable cottage industry of criticism has appeared to decipher, decode, and demolish Michel Foucault. Despite the polemics, ambiguities, and, at times, the impenetrability of his prose, Foucault and his critics do agree that one of the central concerns of his work, particularly his early work, was an analysis of power and how such institutions as police, prisons, and churches reflect the power structures of society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 35 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Foucault's views are summarized in Foucault, Michel, “Governmentality,” Ideology and Consciousness 6 (1979): 5–21,Google Scholar and in Perrot, Michelle, ed., L'Impossible Prison… débal avec Michel Foucault (Paris, 1980), pp. 9–56.Google Scholar The full range of Foucault's scholarship is listed in Clark, Michael, Michel Foucault: An Annotated Bibliography: Tool Kit for a New Age (New York, 1983).Google Scholar

2. Foucault, Michel, Folie et déraison; histoire de la folie á 1âge classique (Paris, 1961), p. 88.Google Scholar Foucault's unfinished three-volume Histoire de la sexualité (Paris, 1978–1984)Google Scholar examines sexuality in the classical era but does not address the implications of the sin of lust in early modern France.

3. Foucault's failure to understand she role of religion in confinement is examined by Midelfort, H. C., “Madness and Civilization in Early Modern Europe,” in After the Reformation: Essays in Honor of J. H. Hexter, ed. Malament, Barbara (Philadelphia, 1980), pp. 247–265.Google Scholar

4. The case for lust is most recently documented by Delumeau, Jean, Le Péché et Ia peur: Ia culpabilisation en Occident XIIIe—XVIIIe siécles (Paris, 1983), pp. 471–497.Google ScholarTentler, Thomas N., Sin and Confession on the Eve of the Reformation (Princeton, 1977), pp. 141–142,Google Scholar lists sixteen sins against sexuality for the early modern era.

5. Bloomfield, Morton W., The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature (East Lansing, Mich., 1967), p. 72.Google Scholar

6. Migne, J.-P., ed., Oeuvres completes de M. Olier (Paris, 1856), p. 460.Google Scholar

7. d'Outreman, Philippe, The True Catholic or the Manner How to Live Christianly, trans. Heigham, John (1622; London, reprint, 1974) p. 117.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., p. 399.

9. Russell, Helen Diane, Jacques Callot: Prints and Related Drawings (Washington, D.C., 1975), p. 159.Google Scholar

10. Despite its age, Brémond's, HenriHistoire littéraire du sentiment religieux en France (Paris, 1925)Google Scholar is the starting point for assessing this interest. The context, rhetorical character, moral rigorism, and current bibliographical orientation of the seventeenth century's interest in sin may be followed in Sauzet, Robert, “Présence rénovée du catholicisme (1520–1670),” in Histoire des catholiques en France du XVe siècle á nos jours, ed. Lebrun, Francois (Toulouse, 1980), pp. 75–145,Google Scholar and Taveneaux, René, Le catholicisme dans Ia France classique: 1610–1715, vol. 1 (Paris, 1980), pp. 267–297.Google Scholar

11. Beyenka, Mary Meichior, ed., Saint Ambrose: Letters (vol. 26 of The Fathers of the Church:A New Translation [hereafter cited as FOTC]. ed. Deferrari, Roy J. [Washington, DC., 1954]), p. 370.Google Scholar

12. Saint Jerome, Adversus Jovinianum, liber secundus, cited in Lebrun, Ch., ed., Oeuvres choisies de Saint-Jean Eudes: Oeuures sacerdotales, vol. 6 (Paris, 1935), p. 405.Google Scholar

13. Musurillo, Herbert, ed., Jean Chrysostome: La Virginzté (vol. 125 of Sources Chrétiennes, ed. Lubac, H. de and Daniélou, J. [Paris, 1966]), pp. 143–145.Google Scholar

14. Deferrari, Roy J., ed., Saint Augustine: Treatises on Marriage and Other Subjets (vol. 27 of FOTC[Washington, 1955]), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

15. Arnauld, Antoine, Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, Docteur de Ia Maison et Société de Sorbonne, vol. 18 (1783; reprint, Brussels, 1967), p. 891.Google Scholar

16. Broutin, Paul, La Réformepastoraleen Franceau XVIIIe siécle, vol.2 (Tournai, 1956), pp. 379–384.Google Scholar

17. Borromée, Charles, Instructions de S. Charles Borromée… nouvelle édition (Paris, 1847), p. 94.Google Scholar

18. Bossuet, Jacques Bénigne, Catechisme de Diocese de Meaux (Paris, 1687), p. 166.Google Scholar

19. Laingui, André and Lebigre, Arlette, Histoire du droit penal, vol. 1 (Paris, 1979), pp. 166–167.Google Scholar

20. Barbarin, Renée, La Condition juridique de Bâtard, d'aprés Ia jurisprudence de Paris (Mayence, 1960), p. 18.Google Scholar

21. Lexicographers agreed with the police. Antoine Furetière defined “crime” as an action against natural or civil law, but he reminded his readers that “there is no crime which will not be punished in this world or the next.” To specify an example of a crime he cited ‘simple fornication”; see Furetiére, Antoine, Le Dictionnaire Universal D'Anloine Furetière, vol. 1 (1690; reprint, Paris, 1978),Google Scholar entry “crime.” Pierre Richelet defined a crime as: “It signifies a fault meriting punishment. Enormous fault. Sin.” To specify an example of a crime he cited a poem written by a woman accused of the crime of adultery; see Richelet, Pierre, Dictionnaire de Ia languefrancazse ancienne et moderne de Pierre Richelel, vol. 1 (Basle, 1735), p. 530.Google Scholar

22. Riley, Philip F., “Women and Police in Louis XIV's Paris,” Eighteenth-Century Life 4 (1977): 37–42.Google Scholar

23. Delamare, Nicholas, Trattè de Ia police…. 2nd ed., 4 vols. (Paris, 1722–1738), 1:528–541Google Scholar for the 1684 ordinance. Its precedent-setting implications may be followed in Porteau-Bitker, Annik, “L'emprisonnement dans le droit laique du moyen age,” Revue historique du droitfrançaise et etranger 46 (1968): 211–245, 389–427,Google Scholar and Benabou, Erica-Marie, La Prostitution et la police des moeurs an X Ville siècle (Paris, 1987), pp. 23–25.Google Scholar

24. Henry, Marthe, Les origines de L'elimination des antisociaux et de l'assistance aux alińnés chroniques: La Salpétrière sons l'ancien régime (Paris, 1922), pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

25. The idiomatic and theological implications of “conversion” are examined by Dumonceaux, P., “Conversion, convertir, étude comparative d'après les lexicographes du XVIIe siécle,” La Conversion an XVIIe siècle: actes du XIIe colloque de Marseille, ed. Duchene, Roger (Marseille, 1983), pp. 7–19.Google Scholar

26. Foucault, Michel, “The Eye of Power: A Conversation with Jean-Pierre Barou and Michelle Perrot,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972- 1977 Michel Foucault, ed. Gordon, Cohn (New York, 1980), pp. 147–165.Google Scholar

27. Delamare, , Traité, p. 535.Google Scholar

28. Migne, , Oeuvres completes de M. Olier, p. 91.Google Scholar

29. Lebrun, , Oeuvres choicies de Saint-Jean Eudes, p. 415.Google Scholar

30. Collection Clairambault, 984, foIs. 94–96, Bibliothéque Nationale, Paris (hereafter cited as BN MS Clair).

31. Delamare, , Traité, p. 542.Google Scholar

32. Memorandum of d'Argenson, 16 November 1703, Manuscrits français, 8124, fol. 51, Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris (hereafter cited as BN MS Fr).

33. Du Chátelet, A.-J. Parent, De Ia prostituttort dans la otile de Paris, vol. 2 (Paris, 1836), pp. 456–457.Google Scholar

34. Memorandum of d'Argenson, 1 April 1702, BN MS Fr 8120, fols. 55–56.

35. Ibid.

36. BN MS Clair, 984, fols. 237, 238, 253.

37. In addition to the police reports, particularly in the BN MS Clair, 984, 985 series, women's corruptive powers as identified by Moliere, Racine, Bossuet, and Fénelon are analyzed in Bénichou, Paul, Morales du Grand Siècle (Paris, 1948), pp. 183–203,Google Scholar and Lougee, Carolyn, Le Paradis des Femmes: Salons and Social Stratification in Seventeenth-Century France (Princeton, 1976), pp. 173–195.Google Scholar

38. Nèron, Pierre, Recueil d'èdits et d'ordonnances royaux, vol. 2 (Paris, 1720), p. 397.Google Scholar

39. Ravaisson, François, ed. Archives de Ia Bastille: Documents inèdits, vol. 10 (Paris, 1866), pp. 337–341.Google Scholar

40. BN MS Clair, 984, fol. 270.

41. Rey, Michel, “Police ci sodomie á Paris au XVIIIe Siècle: du péché au desordre,” Revue d'Ih ctoire moderne et contemporaine 29 (1982): 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. BN MS Clair, 984, foIs. 97–99.

43. BN MS Clair, 984, fol. 54.

44. BN MS Clair, 984, loIs. 221–222.

45. BN MS Clair, 984, fol. 169.

46. Y 14506, July 1701, Archives Nationales, Paris (hereafter cited as AN). Further examples may be found in Williams, Alan, The Police of Paris: 1718–1789 (Baton Rouge, La., 1979), pp. 226–228.Google Scholar

47. Memorandum to d'Argenson, 29 March 1702, AN, O'363, fol. 65.

48. O'Brien, Patricia, The Promise of Punishment: Prisons in Nineteenth-Centuiy France (Princeton, 1982), pp. 3–12.Google Scholar

49. Chartier, Roger, ed. De Ia Renaissance aux Lumiéres, vol. 3 of Histoire de la vie privée, ed. Aries, Philippe and Duby, Georges (Paris, 1986), pp. 15–19.Google Scholar