Article contents
Landmarkism: Doctrinaire Ecclesiology Among Baptists*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
The mid-nineteenth century, which spawned numerous doctrinaire systems, witnessed the rise, among Baptists in Trans-Appalachia and the Southwest, of a doctrinaire ecciesiology which is consistent and rigid, and which calls for denominational exclusivism.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1964
Footnotes
This paper was delivered before the American Society of Church History at St. Paul School of Theology Methodist, Kan is City, Missouri, on April 18, 1964.
References
1. Graves, J. R., Old Landmarkism: What Is It? Memphis, c. 1880, p. xii.Google Scholar Many of Graves' works have been reprinted by Baptist Sunday School Committee, Texarkana, Texas-Arkansas.
2. Dayton, A. C., Theodosia Ernest, Nashville, 1857, II, 16f.Google Scholar
3. Graves, J. R., The Dispensational Expositions of the Parables and Prophecies of Christ, Memphis, c. 1887 (reprint, c. 1928, 1939), p. 63Google Scholar; The Bible Doctrine of the Middle Life, Memphis, 1873 (reprint, c. 1928), p. 51Google Scholar; What Is Conscience? Memphis, c. 1881 (reprint, c. 1928), p. 57.Google Scholar
4. Graves' appendix to Adlam, S., The First Baptist Church in America, Memphis, c. 1887 (reprint, c. 1928, 1939), p. 194.Google Scholar
5. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. xi.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., p. xiv.
7. See excerpts in Smith, H. Shelton, Handy, Robert T., Loetscher, Lefferts A., eds., American Christianity, New York: Charles Seribner's Sons, 1963, II, 111.Google Scholar
8. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. xi–xii.Google Scholar See Barnes, W. W., The Southern Baptist Convention 1845–1953, Nashville: Broadman Press, 1954, p. 104.Google Scholar
9. Graves, J. R., The Watchman's Reply, Nashville, 1853, p. 55.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p. 57.
11. Pendleton, J. M., An Old Landmark Reset, 1854, in Bogard, Ben, ed., Pillars of Orthodoxy, or Defenders of the Faith, Fulton, Kentucky: National Baptist Publication House, 1901, p. 267.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., p. 274; see Smith-Handy-Loetscher, op. cit., II, 111.
13. Pendleton, op. cit., in Bogard, op. cit., p. 275; see Smith-Handy-Loetseher, op. cit., I, 111.
14. Bogard, op. cit., p. 276, note.
15. Quoted from The Tennessee Baptist, October 6, 1857, in Hailey, O. L., J. R. Graves, Life, Times and Teachings, [n. p], 1929, pp. 55f.Google Scholar The quotation comes from definitions of Baptist polity and principles which Graves frequently carried as his paper's editorial policy.
16. Graves, J. H., The Act of Christian Baptism, Memphis, c. 1881 (reprint, c. 1928), p. 7Google Scholar; Old Landmarkism, pp. 51f.
17. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, p. 58Google Scholar; The Lord's Supper, A Church Ordinance, Memphis, c. 1881 (reprint, c. 1928), pp. 11fGoogle Scholar; Christian Baptism, Memphis, a. 1881 (reprint, a. 1928), p. 4.Google Scholar See article entitled “High Churchism Among Baptists,” in Biblical Recorder of North Carolina, 01 24, 1856, p. 1Google Scholar, in reaction to Graves' The Great Iron Wheel.
18. Smith-Handy-Loetscher, op. cit., II, 111.
19. Ibid.
20. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 3Google Scholar; Old Landmarkism, p. 64.
21. Graves' introduction to Dayton, A. C., Pedobaptist and Campbellite Immersions, Nashville, 1858, p. vii.Google Scholar
22. In the famous Graves-Ditzler debate at Carrollton, Mo., in 1875, the details of which are recorded in Graves, J. R., editor, The Graves-Ditzler; or, Great Carrollton Debate, Memphis, 1876, 1184Google Scholar pages, six subjects were dealt with. The “mode of baptism” received almost as much attention (pp. 10–552) as the other five subjects combined. A similar pre-oceupation with mode may be seen in Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, pp. 10–34Google Scholar, and Dayton, A. C., Theodosia Ernest, Nashville, 1856, I, 399p.Google Scholar
23. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, pp. 9, 11.Google Scholar
24. Graves, , The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, pp. 521–524.Google Scholar
25. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 4Google Scholar; Old Landmarkism, pp. 65–78.
26. Pendleton, An Old Landmark Reset, in Bogard, op. cit., p. 271.
27. Graves, , The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, pp. 521–532.Google Scholar These pages summarize Grave's twenty “direct proofs” for immersion, as adduced in eighteen previous speeches.
28. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 4.Google Scholar
29. Dayton, A. C., Pedobaptist and Campbellite Immersions, pp. 197–201Google Scholar; Graves, , Old Landmarkism, P. x.Google Scholar
30. Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 43ff, 69Google Scholar; Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. 33.Google Scholar
31. Pendleton, An Old Landmark Reset, in Bogard, op. cit., p. 280; Smith-Handy-Loetscher, op. cit., II, 112.
32. Pendleton, loc. cit.; Dayton, Pedobaptist and Campbellite Immersions, pp. 185–192.
33. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, p. 51Google Scholar; cf. Old Landmarkism, pp. 33, 52.
34. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, pp. 55f.Google Scholar
35. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 9Google Scholar; cf. Old Landmarkism, pp. 53–63.
36. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, pp. 38–43Google Scholar; Old Landmarkism, pp. 64–79.
37. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, p. 60Google Scholar; cf. Graves, J. R., The Relation of Baptism to Salvation, c. 1881 (reprint, c. 1928), pp. 18–20.Google Scholar
38. Graves, , The Relation of Baptism to Salvation, pp. 6–22.Google Scholar
39. Graves, , Christian Baptism, pp. 10–12;Google Scholar Graves' introduction to Dayton, , Pedobaptist and Campbellite Immersions, pp. iii–xii.Google Scholar
40. Graves, , Christian Baptism, pp. 34f;Google Scholar cf. Old Landmarkism, p. 79.
41. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 35.Google Scholar
42. Ibid., p. 46.
43. Graves, , The Relation of Baptism to Salvation, p. 5.Google Scholar
44. Graves, , Christian Baptism, p. 35Google Scholar; cf. The Relation of Baptism to Salvation, pp. 50–55.
45. Pendleton, J. M., Church Manual, Philadelphia: Judson Press, 1953, pp. 1fGoogle Scholar. This was first published in 1867.
46. Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 96, 99Google Scholar; Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
47. Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 127.Google Scholar
48. Graves, J. R., The New Great Iron Wheel, Memphis, c. 1884 (reprint, c. 1928), pp. 104, 140Google Scholar; cf. Old Landmarkism, pp. 29, 33.
49. Dayton, , Thodosia Ernest, II, 70, 127.Google Scholar
50. Ibid., p. 93; cf. II, 48, 85, 158; Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 131–135, 270, 341, 351ff.Google Scholar
51. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 125f.Google Scholar
52. Ibid., p. 126.
53. Ibid., p. 127.
54. Ibid.
55. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. 43.Google Scholar
56. Ibid.
57. Ibid., p 45.
58. Ibid., pp. 45f.
59. Dayton, Theodosia Ernest, II, 38, 47, 127, 158ff, 175f; Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 140, 274Google Scholar; Carroll, J. M., The Trail of Blood,” Lexington, Kentucky: Ashland Avenne Baptist Church, c. 1931, p. 9.Google Scholar
60. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 22, 29, 33, 112Google Scholar; Old Lanthnarkism, 29–31.
61. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, p. 29.Google Scholar
62. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 125, 135Google Scholar; Old Landmarkism, pp. 27–42; Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 131, 165, 480.Google Scholar
63. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
64. Ibid., p. 32.
65. Ibid., pp. 33f.
66. Ibid., pp. 35–52.
67. Ibid., pp. 53–63.
68. Ibid., pp. 64–79.
69. Ibid., pp. 80–120.
70. Ibid., pp. 121–130.
71. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, p. 88.Google Scholar
72. Ibid., pp. 135f, 145ff, 270, 341, 351ff; Graves, Old Landmarkism, 43–52; Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 85, 158ff.Google Scholar
73. Graves, , The Watchman's Reply, p. 17.Google Scholar
74. Ibid., pp. 14–51; Graves, J. R., The Trilemma, Memphis, c. 1881 (first published, 1860; reprint, c. 1928), p. 103;Google Scholar The New Great Iron Wheel, “dedication,” pp. 111ff, 133, 178ff, 231, 240, 245, 251, 261f, 267ff, 284, 320, 323, 341f, 353ff.
75. Graves, , The Watchman's Reply, p. 14.Google Scholar
76. Ibid., p. 16.
77. Graves, , The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, p. 797.Google Scholar
78. Ibid., p. 915.
79. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. 121.Google Scholar
80. Ibid., p. 123.
81. Graves, , The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, p. 1050Google Scholar; cf. Old Landmarkism, pp. 124f.
82. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. 122f.Google Scholar
83. Ibid., p. 124.
84. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, p. 104.Google Scholar
85. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. 124f.Google Scholar
86. Ibid., pp. 125f.
87. Graves, , The Watchman's Reply, p. 57.Google Scholar
88. Graves, , The Act of Christian Baptism, pp. 11, 23, 33f, 54Google Scholar; The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 390, 439–473; The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, pp. 506–532.
89. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 392–439Google Scholar; The Relation of Baptism to Salvation, pp. 18–22; The Trilemma, pp. 190–197.
90. Graves, J. R., John's Baptism, Memphis, c. 1887 (reprint, c. 1928, 1939), pp. 177–191Google Scholar; The Trilemma, pp. 9–14, 97f; The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 128, 383–390, 427ff; Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 95.Google Scholar
91. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 124f;Google Scholar Old Landmarkism, pp. 35–42; Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 95.Google Scholar
92. Graves, , The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 133, 140, 145, 152, 160, 178ff;Google Scholar Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 158ff.Google Scholar
93. See Ditzler's attack on Baptist succession in Graves, The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, pp. 923–926, 960–966, for examples.
94. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, pp. 124f.Google Scholar
95. Orchard, G. H., A Concise History of Baptists, Nashville, 1855; Reprinted by Ashland Avenue Baptist Church, Lexington, Kentucky, 1956.Google Scholar
97. Ibid., p. xiii.
98. Ibid., p. xii.
99. Ibid., p. xi.
100. Crosby, Thomas, The History of the English Baptists, 1738, vol. IGoogle Scholar Crosby was the first Baptist historian (p. xvii). He cited “no less than seven [eight] different periods of time” which anti-Baptist authors assign “for the first rise of the Baptists” (p. lvii). “Those who write against the Baptists, charge them [Albigenses and Waldenses] with abundance of heresies, and monstrous doctrines; so that it as not easy with certainty to come at their opinions,” even on baptism (pp. xxxiv.xxxv). Since Donatists and Arians “were accused of gross heresies, and the authors of a dreadful schism in the church, some writers against the Baptists are willing enough to represent these as their predecessors” (p. xlvi).
101. Quoted by Graves in introduction, Orchard, op. cit., p xiii.
102. Ibid., p. xv.
103. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. 128.Google Scholar
104. Graves, , The Trilemma, p. 120.Google Scholar
105. Quoted by Graves, in Orchard, op. cit., p. xiv.
106. Ibid., p. xviii.
107. Graves, , The Trilemma, p. 119.Google Scholar
108. Carroll, J. M., The Trail of Blood, c 1931.Google Scholar A chart is attached. It uses red ink to locate “Baptists” in various ages and countries. They are identified by other names before the 17th century.
109. Ibid., pp. 11f, 55f; see chart.
110. Graves, , The Trilemma, pp. 77–118, 162.Google Scholar
111. Ibid., pp. 13f, 71–79; The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 86f.
112. Graves, , The Trilemma, pp. 83–85Google Scholar; The New Great Iron Wheel, pp. 35. 47; The Graves-Ditzler … Debate, pp. 935–938; Dayton, , Theodosia Ernest, II, 98f.Google Scholar
113. Graves, , Old Landmarkism, p. xv.Google Scholar
114. Ibid., pp. xv-xvi.
- 1
- Cited by