No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Scholars of Pietism, the religious reform movement of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, have attempted in recent years to increase understanding and respect for the movement among American scholars. F. Ernest Stoeffler's The Rise of Evangelical Pietism (1971), Dale Brown's Understanding Pietism (1978), and Peter Erb's Pietists: Selected Writings (1983) all begin with a plea for open-minded recognition of Pietism's positive contributions. Our negative interpretation of the movement, they note, has been shaped largely by those opponents who first gave the Pietists their label.
1. Carl, Halter and Carl, Schalk, eds., A Handbook of Church Music (St. Louis, 1978), p. 71.Google Scholar
2. Leo, Schrade, “Bach: The Conflict between the Sacred and the Secular,” in De Scientia Musicae Studia atque Orationes, ed. Ernst, Lichtenhahn (Bern, 1967), p. 441, 442, 467.Google Scholar
3. Manfred, Bukofzer, Music in the Baroque Era (New York, 1947), p. 272.Google Scholar
4. Martin, Dibelius, “Individualismus und Gemeindebewusstsein in Johann Sebastian Bachs Passionen,” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 41 (1948): 140. This and all subsequent translations from the German are my own.Google Scholar
5. Bukofzer, , Music in the Baroque Era, p. 79.Google Scholar
6. Buszin, Walter E., “Melodies,” The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church, 3 vols. (Minneapolis, 1965), 2:1534.Google Scholar
7. Ulrich, Siegele, “Bachs Ort in Orthodoxie und Aufklärung,” Musik und Kirche 51 (1981):11.Google Scholar
8. For a discussion of scholarly efforts in this direction, see Johannes, Wallmann, “Pietismus und Orthodoxie,” Geist und Geschichte der Reformation: Festgabe Hanns Rückert zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin, 1966), pp. 418–442.Google Scholar
9. Theophilus, Groβgebauer, Drey Geistreiche Schrifften: I. Wächter-Stimme Aus dem verwüsteten Zion; II. Praeservativ Wider die Pest der heutigen Atheisten; III. Alte Religion (Frankfurt, 1710), pp. 208–209.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p. 225.
11. An early formulation of this position is found in the deliberations of the theological faculty at Wittenberg concerning the rejection of organs in Anhalt, published as Notwendige Antwort auff die im Fürstenthumb Anhalt Ohn langsten ausgesprengte hefftige Schrift (Wittenberg, 1597)Google Scholar, reprinted in Georg, Dedeken, Thesauri Consiliorum et Decisionum, 2 vols. (Hamburg, 1623), 1:1073–77, esp. 1076.Google Scholar
12. Groβgebauer, , Drey Geistreiche Schrifften, p. 211: “Certainly it is not without reason that in both sacraments the Lord Jesus presented to us not his resurrection and glory but his deep humiliation, disgrace, wounds, weals, outpouring of blood, death, and burial.”Google Scholar
13. Ibid., p. 194.
14. Ibid., pp. 216–217.
15. Johann, Muscovius, Bestraffter Miβbrauch der Kirchen-Music (n.p., 1694), pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., pp. 16,30.
17. Gottfried, Arnold, Unpartheyische Kirchen- und Ketzer-Historien, Von Anfang des Neuen Testaments bis auf das Jahr Christi 1688 (Schaffhausen, 1740), p. 732 (pt. 2, bk. 16, c. 11).Google Scholar
18. Philipp, Jacob Spener, Theologische Bedencken, 4 parts (Halle, 1712), 1:113.Google Scholar
19. Andreas, Werckmeister, Der Edlen Music-Kunst Würde, Gebrauch und Miβbrauch (Frankfurt, 1691), p. 13.Google Scholar
20. Ibid., p. 18.
21. Gottfried, Vockerodt, Miβbrauch der freyen Künste, insonderheit Der Music (Frankfurt, 1697), pp. 28, 32, 42.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., p. 27.
23. Ibid., p. 29.
24. Ibid., pp. 29–30.
25. Georg, Motz, Die Vertheidigte Kirchen-Music (n.p., 1703), p. 37.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., p. 41.
27. Otto, Krabbe, Heinrich Müller und seine Zeit (Rostock, 1866), pp. 196–217 Google Scholar; Dietrich, Winkler, “Grundzüge der Frömmigkeit Heinrich Müllers,” (Diss., University of Rostock, 1954), pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
28. Heinrich, Müller, Geistliche Seelen Musik Bestehend in zehen betrachtungen (Rostock, 1659), p. 139.Google Scholar
29. Bach-Dokumente. Vol. 2, Fremdschriftliche und gedruckte Dokumente zur Lebensge-schichte Johann Sebastian Bachs, 1685 bis 1750, ed. Werner, Neumann and Hans-Joachim, Schulze (Kassel, 1969), pp. 494–496.Google Scholar
30. Albert, Schweitzer, Bach, J. S., trans. Ernest Newman, 2 vols. (New York, 1935), 1:169.Google Scholar