Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:28:41.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deposition of Ministers in the Church of Scotland Under the Covenanters, 1638–1651

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

David Stevenson
David Stevenson
Affiliation:
Mr. Stevenson is lecturer in history in the University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The period 1638–1651 saw the first major purges of the ministry of the reformed kirk in Scotland since the Reformation. These were the forerunners of the later great purges associated with the Restoration (of monarchy and episcopacy) in the 1660s and with the Revolution and re-establishment of presbyterianism in 1688–1690. Before 1638, for all the conflicts within the kirk and in its relations with the state, deposition of ministers had been rare. J. K. Hewison's estimate of 49 deprivations or depositions in 1560–1638 is probably too low, but is of the right order. No detailed study of depositions under the covenanters has ever been made. Hewison calculated that 138 ministers were deprived in the whole of the period 1638–1660. but this figure is far too low. More recentestimates (again covering 1638–1660) of about 200, and of about 210 depositions come much nearer the truth, but they also are too low; there were more depositions than this even in 1638–1651. Considering the importance attached to the depositions after 1660 and after 1688 as indicating the acceptability to ministers of the religious changes then introduced and the extent of persecution, it is rather surprising that so little attention has been paid to the predecessors of these purges— though James Bulloch's two useful local studies of depositions do cover the whole of the seventeenth century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 321 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hewison, J. K., The Convenanters, 2 vols. (Glasgow, 1913), 1: 496.Google Scholar

2. Ibid.

3. Donaldson, G., Scotland: James V to James VII (Edinburgh and London, 1965), pp. 365–366.Google Scholar

4. Drummond, A. L. and Bulloch, J., The Scottish Church, 1688–1843 (Edinburgh, 1973), p. 5.Google Scholar

5. Bulloch, J., “Conformists and Nonconformists,” Transactions of the East Lothian Antiquarian and Field Naturalists Society 8 (1960): 70–84Google Scholar; idem, “Ecclesiastical Intolerance in Seventeenth Century Berwickshire,” History of the Berwickshire Naturalists'Club 36 (1962–1964): 148–58.

6. Scott, H., ed., Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae, 8 vols. (Edinburgh, 1915–1950).Google Scholar

7. Peterkin, A, ed., Records of the Kirk of Scotland, containing the Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies (Edinburgh, 1838)Google Scholar; Scottish Record Office (hereafter SRO), CH. 1/1/9, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies, 1642–1646.

8. Mitchell, A. F. and Christie, J., eds., The Records of the Commissioners of the General Assemblies of the Church of Scotland, 1646–1602 (hereafter RCGA), 3 vols. (Edinburgh, 1892–1909)Google Scholar.

9. For these see Gouldesbrough, P., Kup, A. P. and Lewis, I., eds., Handlist of Scottish and Welsh Record Publications (London, 1954).Google Scholar

10. The most important of these being Baillie, R., Letters and Journals, ed., Laing, D., 3 vols. (Edinburgh, 1841–1842)Google Scholar; Balfour, J., Historical Works, ed., Haig, J., 4 vols. (Edinburgh, 1824–1825)Google Scholar; Gordon, J., History of Scots Affairs, ed. Robertson, J. and Grub, G., 3 vo1s. (Aberdeen, 1841)Google Scholar; Guthry, H., Memoirs (Glasgow, 1747)Google Scholar; and Spalding, J., Memorsafls of the Trubles, ed. Stuart, J., 2 vols. (Aberdeen, 1850–1851)Google Scholar.

11. See Records of the Church of Scotland preserved in the Scottish Record Office and General Register Office… (Glasgow, 1967).Google Scholar

12. Considerations of space prevent inclusion of a full list of the ministers deposed and of sources of information about them; instead a table showing the distribution of depositions has been appended to this article, and the main sources have been listed above.

13. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 160.Google Scholar

14. After the name of each minister, the names of his parish and of its presbytery are given in brackets; where only one name appears the name of the parish and the presbytery were the same.

15. Scott, , Fasti, 5:206Google Scholar; [Kinloch, G. R., ed.], Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife (Edinburgh, 1837), Appendix, p. 267Google Scholar; [Kinloch, G. B., ed.], Selections from the Minutes of the Presbyteries of St. Andrews and Cupar (Edinburgh, 1837), pp. 44–45Google Scholar; RCGA, 2:287–238.

16. Scott, , Fasti, 5: 61.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., 2:36–37; Bulloch, , “Berwickshire,” p. 150Google Scholar; Baillie, , Letters, 1: 165Google Scholar; Gordon, , History, 2:143–145.Google Scholar

18. Scott, , Fasti, 1: 294, 359, 365Google Scholar; Bulloch, , “Conformists and Nonconformists,” p. 73.Google Scholar

19. Bulloch, Thus, “Berwickshire,” p. 151Google Scholar refers to twelve ministers deposed in Berwickshire after the engagement. Of these, three were evidently deposed in 1652–1659 and are therefore outside the scope of the present study. But of the remaining nine I know of evidence for the deposition of only four; the other five just disappear. Two are known to have been suspended, but there is no evidence of their deposition; two more probably continued in the ministry until their deaths, while the fifth was probably never settled in his parish.

20. Scott, , Fasti, 7: 351;Google ScholarPeterkin, , Records of the Kirk, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

21. Scott, , Fasti, 5: 206, 7: 411.Google Scholar

22. Bulloch, , “Berwiwckshire,” p. 148.Google Scholar

23. Ibid., p. 150.

24. Scott, , Fasti, 6: 173Google Scholar; Spalding, , Memorialls, 2:136, 203, 260.Google Scholar

25. Scott, , Fasti, 1: 276–277, 2: 348Google Scholar; Baillie, , Letters, 1: 367–368, 383.Google Scholar

26. Scott, , Fasti, 4: 62Google Scholar; MacTavish, D.C., ed., Minutes of the Synod of Argyll, 1639–1661, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1943–1944), 1: 80, 150.Google Scholar

27. Scott, , Fasti, 2: 370Google Scholar; SRO, CH. 1/1/9, 4 August 1642.

28. See Table on p. 335.

29. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 181.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., p. 47; Baillie, , Letters, 1: 170Google Scholar; Balfour, , Historical Works, 2:308Google Scholar; Gordon, , History, 2: 152–153Google Scholar. For the commission for Edinburgh see Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1638–1639, ed. J. Bruce (London, 1871), p. 149.Google Scholar

31. Gordon, , History, 2: 95.Google Scholar

32. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 26.Google Scholar

33. Calculation of the exact number of depositions by the commissions is made impossible by the fact that the records often confusingiy call the commissions “synods.”

34. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 205.Google Scholar

35. Ibid.

36. Scott, , Fasti, 6: 71.Google Scholar

37. Mair, T., ed., Narratives and Extracts from the Records of the Presbytery of Ellon (Aberdeen, 1898), pp. 140, 142–143Google Scholar; Guthry, , Mcmoirs, pp. 77–78.Google Scholar

38. Baillie, Letters, 1: 221.Google Scholar

39. Rutherford, S., Letters, ed. Bonar, A. A. (Edinburgh and London, 1894), p. 616.Google Scholar

40. Burnet, G., History of My Own Times, ed., Airy, O., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1897–1900), 1: 58.Google Scholar

41. Sharpe, L. W. ed., Early Letters of Robert Wodrow, 1698–1709 (Edinburgh, 1937), p. 303.Google Scholar

42. Gordon, , History, 3: 54.Google Scholar

43. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 293.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 349.

45. Ibid., p. 427. It was declared that the act would not apply to John Grahame (Auchterarder) and George Halyburton (Perth, second charge), who were both restored to their fornier parishes. Both men had powerful lay supporters; see Scott, Fasti, 4: 34, 258; Guthry, Memoirs, pp. 181–182; SRO, CH. 1/1/9, 13 February 1645.

46. Scott, , Fasti, 2: 353, 370Google Scholar: Baillie, , Letters, 2: 51, 52–53;Google Scholar SRO, CH. 1/1/9, 4 August 1642; Stevenson, D., “The Radical Party in the Kirk, 1637–45” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 25 (1974): 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. RCGA, 1: 242–273.

48. Guthry, , Memoirs, p. 205.Google Scholar

49. Scott, , Fasti, 2: 129Google Scholar; 5: 258; 6: 130, 445; Mitchell, A., ed, MacFarlane's Geographical Collections, 3 vols. (Edinburgh, 1906–1908), 1: 218.Google Scholar

50. Napier, M., ed., Memorials of Montrose, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1848–1850), 2: 313–314.Google Scholar

51. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 496.Google Scholar

52. Ibid., p. 517.

53. Ibid., pp. 509–510.

54. Ibid., p. 426.

55. Baillie, , Letters, 3: 58.Google Scholar

56. Ibid., 3: 55.

57. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, pp. 517, 518, 520.Google Scholar

58. Guthry, , Memoirs, pp. 299–300.Google Scholar

59. Another two (in the Presbytery of Kilmore) were supporters of the earlier royalist risings.

60. Scott, , Fasti, 1: 70Google Scholar; 134; Baillie, , Letters, 3: 92.Google Scholar

61. Balfour, , Historical Works, 3: 419.Google Scholar

62. Kirkton, J., The Secret and True History of the Church of Scotland, ed. Sharpe, C. K. (Edinburgh, 1817), p. 48.Google Scholar

63. Baillie, , Letters, 3: 81, 82.Google Scholar

64. Ibid., 3: 91–92. Mathieson, W. L., Politics and Religion (Glasgow, 1902)Google Scholar, is thus wrong in claiming that the assembly deposed seventeen ministers. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, pp. 555–559.Google Scholar

65. Baillie, , Letters, 3: 97.Google Scholar

66. Kirkton, , The Secret and True History, p. 48.Google Scholar

67. National Library of Scotland (hereafter NLS), Wodrow MS Folio 25, no. 57, A. Case to R. Douglas and J. Smith, 2 July 1649.

68. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, pp. 557–558.Google Scholar

69. NLS, Wodrow MS Folio 25, no. 59, J. Hamilton to R. Douglas, 30 September 1649.

70. Balfour, , Historical Works, 3: 430Google Scholar; Lamont, J., The Chronicle of Fife (Edinburgh, 1810), p. 12.Google Scholar

71. Ogilvie, W. M., ed., Extracts from the Records of the Presbytery of Brechin (Dundee, 1876), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

72. Scott, , Fasti, 5: 300.Google Scholar

73. Lamont, , Chronicle, p. 26.Google Scholar

74. Scott, , Fasti, 7: 119.Google Scholar

75. RCGA, 3: 404.

76. Scott, , Fasli, 3: 462Google Scholar; 4: 289–290, 318–319; Lament, , Chronicle, p. 40Google Scholar; McCrie, T., ed. The Life of Mr. Robert Blair (Edinburgh, 1848), pp. 239, 278.Google Scholar

77. [Johnston, A. of Wariston,] Causes of the Lords Wrath against Scotland, Manifested in his sad late dispensations (1653), pp. 34, 84.Google Scholar

78. Ferguson, W., Scotland: 1689 to the Present (London and Edinburgh, 1968), p. 104.Google Scholar

79. Scott, , Fasti, 3: 289, 300;Google Scholar 7: 222; [Robertson, J., ed.], Selections from the Registers of the Presbytery of Lanark, (Edinburgh, 1839), pp. 22–24Google Scholar; RCGA, 1: 28, 102.

80. Donaldson, , Scotland, p. 365Google Scholar; Dickinson, W. C., Donaldson, G. and Milne, I. A., eds., A Source Book of Scottish History, 3 Vols., (London 1958–1961), 3: 162.Google Scholar

81. Drummond, and Bulloch, , The Scottish Church, p. 5.Google Scholar

82. Donaldson, G., Scotland: Church and Nation through Sixteen Centuries (Edinburgh, 1972), p. 93.Google Scholar

83. Drummond, and Bulloch, , The Scottish Church, p. 9.Google Scholar

84. In a few instances it is not certain within a year or two when a minister was deposed; in these cases the deposition has been assigned to the most likely year.

85. Figures given in parentheses after the names of synods indicate the approximate number of ministers in each in about 1645. It must be emphasized that these figures can only be approximate since the information in the Fasti is not sufficient to enable a full list of ministers at any given time to be calculated. To avoid giving any false impression of precision the figures have been rounded up or down to the nearest five.

86. In 1646 the Synod of Orkney and Shetland was merged with that of Sutherland and Caithness, but in 1648 the Presbytery of Scalloway (Shetland) was declared to be immediately dependent on the general assembly, belonging to no synod. For the sake of convenience these changes have been ignored in the Table.