Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:58:37.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Conflict of Associations: The National Camp-Meeting Association for the Promotion of Holiness Versus the Methodist Episcopal Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

A. Gregory Schneider
A. Gregory Schneider
Affiliation:
professor of behavioral science at Pacific Union College, Angwin, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hiram Mattison was fighting mad. Some of the holiness people in the Methodist Episcopal church had pulled a fast one. Early in 1867 the New York Preachers' Meeting had hosted a series of speeches on the question, “What are the best methods for promoting the experience of perfect love?” The discussion had been, in the words of one participant, “lengthy and pungent.” Mattison, a seminary professor and long-time opponent of the holiness movement, had weighed in with his professional theological polemics against the movement's doctrine and methods of promotion. He had expected that all the speeches would be published in a single volume. But the proponents of perfect love surreptitiously had withdrawn their manuscripts from the Methodist book room and had them published and copyrighted on their own. The original plan to publish a two-sided debate had been thus defeated, and the advocates of perfect love had scooped their opposition. What a move for people who professed to have attained Christian perfection, said Mattison. It must have paid well, he added, for three editions had been issued in just a few weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 268 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Woodruff, George W., “Introduction,” in True Method of Promoting Love, from Debates in the New York Preachers' Meeting of the Methodist Episcopal Church (New York, 1867), p. iii.Google Scholar

2. Mattison, Hiram, “Introduction,” in Perfect Love; or the Speeches of Rev. Janes, E. L., Rev. Mattison, H., D.D., Rev. Curry, D., D.D., Rev. Buckley, J. M., and Rev. Brown, S. D., in the New York Preachers' Meeting, in March and April, 1867, upon the Subject of Sanctification (New York, 1868), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

3. Ibid., p. 5.

4. This disagreement is obvious in the New York preachers' debate. See True Method and Perfect Love. Later evidence of the disagreement may be found in Crane, J. T., Holiness the Birthright of All God's Children (New York, 1874);Google ScholarWhedon, D. D., “Quarterly Book Table: The Christian Standard and Home Journal, Article: Dr. Crane's Book and the Quarterly Review,” Methodist Quarterly Review 56 (October 1874): 662–681;Google ScholarClark, J. O. A., “Holiness,” Methodist Quarterly Review 59 (July 1877): 505–522;Google Scholarand Watson, George D., That Review Article (Philadelphia, Pa., n.d.).Google Scholar

5. The following interpretation of the early American Methodist community and its context reflects my book, The Way of the Cross Leads Home: The Domestication of American Methodism (Bloomington, Ind., 1993).Google Scholar

6. Norwood, Frederick A., The Story of American Methodism: A History of the United Methodists and Their Relations (Nashville, Term., 1974), p. 257.Google Scholar

7. Dieter, Holiness Revival, pp. 25–36, 47.Google Scholar

8. King, William M., “Denominational Modernization and Religious Identity: The Case of the Methodist Episcopal Church,” Methodist History 20 (January 1982): 75–89.Google Scholar

9. Journal of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church Held in Brooklyn, New York, 1872, ed. Harris, W. L. and Woodruff, G. W. (New York, 1872), pp. 443–445.Google Scholar

10. Journal of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, Held in Baltimore, Maryland, May 1–31, 1876, ed. Woodruff, George W. (NewYork, 1876), pp. 409–410.Google Scholar

11. Trachtenberg, Alan, The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age (New York, 1982).Google Scholar

12. Donald, David Herbert, “Forward” to Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order: 1877–1920 (New York, 1967), pp. vii–viii;Google Scholarand Bledstein, Burton J., The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America (New York, 1976).Google Scholar

13. Richey, Russell E., “Institutional Forms of Religion,” in Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience: Studies of Traditions and Movements, ed. Lippy, Charles H. and Williams, Peter W. (New York, 1988), 1:38–41; and Ben Primer, Protestants and American Business Methods (n.p., 1979).Google Scholar

14. Singleton, Gregory, “Protestant Voluntary Organizations and the Shaping of Victorian America,” American Quarterly 27 (December 1975): 549–560;CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Hall, Peter Dobkin, The Organization of American Culture, 1700–1900: Private Institutions, Elites, and the Origins of American Nationality (New York, 1984).Google Scholar

15. Inskip, J. S., “A Felt Want,” Advocate of Christian Holiness 8 (July 1877): 157.Google Scholar

16. For the single most comprehensive rendition of these evils, see “The Cry of the Period,” chapter 1 in Hughes, George, Days of Power in the Forest Temple (1873; repr. Salem, Ohio, 1975), pp. 7–31.Google Scholar

17. Searles, J. E., “A Brief Sketch of the Holiness Revival; especially of the Origin and Work of ‘The National Camp-Meeting Association for the Promotion of Holiness,’” in Proceedings of Holiness Conferences held at Cincinnati, Nov. 26th, 1877, and at New York, Dec. 17, 1877 (New York, 1985), p. 123.Google Scholar

18. Swartz, Charles W., comp., Our Holy Christianity: A Series of Essays and Sermons upon the Nature of Regeneration, or Holiness, and Christian Manhood, or Perfection (Davenport, la., 1873);Google Scholarand Whedon, Daniel, review of Our Holy Christianity, Methodist Quarterly Review 56 (October 1874): 682–686.Google Scholar

19. Journal of the General Conference, 1876, pp. 399–401.Google Scholar

20. “Connectionalism” and “The New Paper—Why,” Baltimore Methodist, 5 June 1879, p. 4.Google Scholar

21. Lore, D. D., “A Holiness Literature,” Northern Christian Advocate, 6 August 1874, p. 252;Google Scholarand “Teaching Holiness,” Northern Christian Advocate, 13 August 1874, p. 260.Google ScholarSee Curry's, borrowing and commentary in “Is a Special ‘Holiness’ Literature Needed,” New York Christian Advocate, 20 August 1874, p. 268.Google ScholarFor similar sentiments from other quarters, see Wheeler, David H., “Too Much Emphasis,” The Methodist, 26 January 1878, p. 2;Google Scholarand Whedon, Daniel D., “Quarterly Book Table,” Methodist Quarterly Review 56 (October 1874): 662–681.Google Scholar

22. Whedon, , “Quarterly Book Table,” p. 679;Google ScholarCurry, Daniel, “Speech of Daniel Curry, D.D.,” in Perfect Love, p. 45;Google Scholarand “Entire Sanctification,” Boston Zion's Herald, 14 May 1874, p. 153.Google Scholar

23. Curry, , “Speech of Daniel Curry,” pp. 40–46;Google ScholarCurry, , “A Discord Harmonized,” New York Christian Advocate, 30 April 1874, p. 140; and Lore, “Teaching Holiness,” p. 260.Google Scholar

24. Journal of the General Conference, 1876, p. 410.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., pp. 399–400.

26. “General Missionary Committee,” New York Christian Advocate, 22 November 1877, p. 744; see also on the same page C. H. Fowler's editorial, “Go.”Google Scholar

27. Wood, J. A., “A Holy Church,” Advocate of Christian Holiness 8 (January 1877): 4–6.Google Scholar

28. Inskip, John S., “What are the Best Methods of Promoting Holiness Among our People,” an address reported by “la Grange,” Philadelphia Methodist Home Journal, 23 February 1867, P. 6.Google Scholar

29. Hughes, Days of Power, pp. 60, 255, 453.Google Scholar

30. Hughes, George, “The Vineland Encampment,” Guide to Holiness 52 (September 1867): 91.Google Scholar

31. Ridgaway, Henry Bascom, The Life of the Rev. Alfred Cookman; with some account of his father, The Rev. George Grimston Cookman (New York, 1874), p. 380.Google Scholar

32. Kynett, A.J., “Church Extension,” Methodist Quarterly Review 54 (April 1872): 269.Google Scholar

33. Journal of the General Conference, 1876, pp. 399–401.Google Scholar

34. “Aspects of Methodism: Second Paper,” The Methodist, 8 August 1868, p. 252.Google Scholar

35. See, for instance, the editorial complaint in “Camp-Meetings—Past and Present,” The Methodist, 29 August 1868, p. 276.Google Scholar

36. “Reports from Camp-Meetings,” The Methodist, 8 August 1868, p. 253.Google Scholar

37. McLean, A. and Eaton, J. W., eds., Penuel; or, Face to Face with God (1869; repr. New York, 1984), pp. 148–150.Google Scholar

38. Hughes, Days of Power, pp. 214–219. See also Bascom, Life of Cookman, p. 379.Google Scholar

39. McDonald, William and Searles, John E., The Life of Rev. John S. Inskip (1885; repr. New York, 1985), p. 202. See also the remarkable ecumenical claims in Hughes, Days of Power, pp. 439–445.Google Scholar

40. “Division in the Church,” Philadelphia Christian Standard and Home Journal, 1 March 1879, p. 68.Google Scholar

41. “Church Fellowship,” Philadelphia Christian Standard and Home Journal, 15 February 1879, p. 52; and Ridgaway, Life of Cookman, pp. 319–322.Google Scholar

42. Searles, “Brief Sketch of the Holiness Revival,” p. 122.Google Scholar

43. Watson, George D., “More Tinkering,” Philadelphia Christian Standard and Home Journal, 4 January 1979, p. 1.Google Scholar

44. Hughes, Days of Power, pp. 39–41, 48–49, 51–56, 264–284; and Searles, “Brief Sketch of the Holiness Revival,” p. 120.Google Scholar

45. Watson, “More Tinkering,” p. 1.Google Scholar

46. Tower, P., “The Lost Power, or Defective Piety of the Age,” Philadelphia Christian Standard and Home Journal, 30 December 1876, p. 418; and Ridgaway, Life of Cookman, pp. 353–359.Google Scholar

47. Inskip, “A Felt Want,” p. 157.Google Scholar

48. See, for example, Smith, Timothy L., Called Unto Holiness: The Story of the Nazarenes: The Formative Years (Kansas City, Mo., 1962).Google Scholar

49. Wrong, Dennis H., Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses (New York, 1980), p. 257.Google Scholar