Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:55:02.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Coming of the Reformation to Edinburgh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

W. Stanford Reid
W. Stanford Reid
Affiliation:
Professor of history in the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That towns and townspeople played an important part in the Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century is obvious even to those with a superficial knowledge of the movement. In the case of Scotland, however, this has not always been recognized as true since many writers on the subject have believed that the movement was primarily baronial in character. Yet as one looks closely into the Scottish Reformation the names of Aberdeen, Perth, Dundee and Edinburgh fill important places in the story of the rise of Scottish Protestantism. Edinburgh in particular held a strategic position as Knox, recently appointed minister of St. Giles, recognized in 1561. When Thomas Randolph reported to Sir William Cecil on the appointment of superintendents he stated: “Mr. Knox thinks his state honorable enough if God give him strength to persist in that vocation that he hath placed him in, and will receive no other.” To understand the Scottish Reformation, therefore, it is necessary to see what happened in the principal burgh of the country.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 27 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Calendar of State Papers Relating to Scotland, 1547–63, J. Bain, ed. (Edinburgh, 1898), 1. p. 523, no. 967 (hereafter C.S.P.).Google Scholar

2. Lythe, S. G. E., The Economy of Scotland, 1550–1665 (Edinburgh, 1960), pp. 1, 3, 6, 16, 117, 244Google Scholar; Grant, I. F., The Social and Economic Development of Scotland to 1603 (Edinburgh, 1930), p. 351Google Scholar. Margaret Wood points out that Edinburgh's rich trading community often acted for the Scottish merchants as a whole. As an indication of Edinburgh's economic Importance she also notes that between June and October 1556 nineteen ships sailed from Leith to foreign ports (Wood, M.). “The Domestic Affairs of the Burgh, 1554–89,” Book of the Old Edinburgh Club (Edinburgh, 1928), 15, pp. 4–5 (hereafter B.O.E.C.).Google Scholar

3. Fairley, J. A., “The Old Tolbooth: with extracts from the records,” B.O.E.C., 1, p. 87Google Scholar; Extracts from the Records of the Burgh of Edinburgh, 1557–71 (Edinburgh, 1875), 2, pp. 13, 75, 81, 159, 188, 248, 256, 282 (hereafter Edin. Recs.)Google Scholar; Wood, op. cit., p. 24; Grant, op. cit., p. 396; Register of the Secret Seal of Scotland, 6, no. 833 (hereafter R.S.S.).

4. Council Records (Mss), Edinburgh Archives, fos. 132ff; Angus, W., “The Incorporated Trade of the Skinners,” B.O.E.C., (1913), 6, pp. 28–29Google Scholar, estimates that they formed two- thirds of the burgh population.

5. Mss. Co. Recs., fos. 126ff; Warrack, J., Domestic Life in Scotland, 1438–1688, (London, 1920), pp. 63ffGoogle Scholar; Lythe, op. cit., p. 120; Wood, op. cit., p. 26.

6. Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland, (1824), 2, p. 95, c6Google Scholar; p. 244, c25; p. 349, c35 (hereafter A.P.S.); Grant, op. cit., pp. 388ff, 427; MacKenzie, W. M., The Scottish Burghs (Edinburgh, 1949), pp. 104ff.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., pp. 323ff. Lythe, op. cit., pp. 116ff, deals with Scottish trade as a whole after 1560, while other works such as Davidson, J. and Gray, A., The Scottish Staple at Veers (Edinburgh, 1909)Google Scholar, and Rooseboom, M. P., The Scottish Staple in the Netherlands (Hague, 1910)Google Scholar, deal more intensively with the trade to the Netherlands.

8. Grant, op. cit., p. 384; Wood, op. cit., p. 26; Geddie, J. “Sculptured Stones of Old Edinburgh,” B.O.E.C., (1908), 1, p. 81Google Scholar; R.S.S., 5, nos. 1848, 2825, 3160; 6, nos. 138 1313, 1346; see Reid, W. S., Skipper from Leith (Philadelphia, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, passim, for references to Barton and others.

9. Lythe, op. cit., p. 30; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 148; R.S.S., 6, pp. 164–66; Grant, op. cit., pp. 558f.; Ridley, J., John Knox (Oxford, 1968), pp. 381ff.Google Scholar

10. A.P.S., 2, pp. 497f.

11. Edin. Recs., 2, p. 263; 3, p. 1.

12. Ibid., 3, p. 263.

13. Ibid., 3, pp. 15, 53, 219f; Calendar of Scottish Papers, J. Bain, ed. (Edinburgh, 1898), 1, p. 555, no. 1023 (hereafter C.S.P.)Google Scholar; Whitson, T. B., The Lord Provosts of Edinburgh, 1296–1932 (Edinburgh, 1932), pp. 18ff.Google Scholar

14. Grant, op. cit., pp. 397ff; Edin. Recs., 3 pp. 19ff, 155, 332.

15. Ibid., pp. 19ff; Mss. Co. Records, fo. 125v.

16. John Knox's History of the Reformation in Scotland, W. C. Dickinson, ed. (Edinburgh, 1949), 1, pp. 25ff, 42ff.Google Scholar

17. Bryce, W. M., “The Black Friars of Edinburgh,” B.O.E.C., (1910), 3, pp. 56fGoogle Scholar, points out that the Franciscans preached against these two Black Friars in the streets of Edinburgh.

18. Knox, op. cit., 1, pp. 43, 114f; R.S.S., 4, nos. 128, 864, 909, 944, 975, 1128, 1473, 1615, 2507.

19. Knox, op. cit., 1, pp. 121ff; 4, pp. 217f.

20. Ibid., 1, p. 125.

21. Knox, op. cit., 1, pp. 127f, 136; Edin. Recs., 2, pp. 251, 261; 3, p. 41; Anderson, W. I., “Some Documents of the Scottish Reformation,” Essays on the Scotttish Reformation, 1513–1625, McRoberts, D., ed. (Glasgow, 1962), pp. 361ff.Google Scholar

22. Ibid.

23. Knox, op. cit., 1, pp. 148ff.

24. Ibid., 1, pp. 162; Bryce, op. cit., pp. 64, 65.

25. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 37, 39, 40, 41.

26. Knox, op. cit., 1, pp. 192, 199f; C.S.P., 1, p. 262, no. 556.

27. Lang, A., John Knox and the Reformation (London, 1905), pp. 142ff.Google Scholar

28. C.S.P., 1, p. 236, no. 510; Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 46, 47; Knox, op. cit., 1, p. 213.

29. Ibid., 1, p. 59.

30. C.S.P., 1, p. 262, no. 566.

31. Ibid., 1, p. 323, no. 662.

32. Ibid., 1, p. 386, no. 756; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 63.

33. Marwick, J. D., History of the Collegiate Church and Hospital of Holy Trinity, 1460–1661 (Edinburgh, 1911), p. 39Google Scholar; A Diurnal of Remarkable Occurrents that have passed within the Country of Scotland since the Death of James IV till the year 1575, Edinburgh, 1833, pp. 61–62Google Scholar; Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 138, 161, 175, 211, 266.

34. Lang, op. cit., passim; W. L. Mathieson, Politics and Religion in Scotland, 155–1695, 1, chap. 3; Fraser, A., Mary Queen of Scots (New York, 1970), Part Two.Google Scholar

35. Watt, H., John Knox in Controversy (London, 1950), pp. 8f.Google Scholar

36. Knox, op. cit., 1, p. 211.

37. Watt, op. cit., pp. 98 ff; Knox, op. cit., 2, pp. 13ff, 43ff, 64f, 71f.

38. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 86, 97, 99, 115, 210; Calderwood, D., Historie of the Kirk of Scotland, Thomson, T., ed. (Edinburgh, 1843), 2, p. 172.Google Scholar

39. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 63f., 68, 76, 128, 154, 191, 258, 260.

40. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 65, 75.

41. Ibid., 3, pp. 68, 72, 181, 135, 185.

42. Ibid., 3, p. 129.

43. Ibid., 3, pp. 85, 132, 162, 164.

44. Papal Negotiations with Mary, J. H. Pollen, ed. (Edinburgh, 1901) (SHS), p. 520.Google Scholar

45. Lang, op. cit., p. 266.

46. See C.S.P., 1, p. 552, no. 1017; p. 561, no. 1035; p. 597, no. 1071; p. 672, no. 1155.

47. Ibid., 1, p. 548, no. 1010; Janton, P., John Knox, l'homme et l'oeuvre (Paris, 1967), pp. 180ff.Google Scholar

48. Diurnal, pp. 81f; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 200.

49. Lee, M., James Stewart, Earl of Moray (New York, 1953), pp. 230ffGoogle Scholar; Diurnal, pp. 136ff.

50. Register of the Privy Council, D. Masson, ed. (Edinburgh, 1898), 14, pp. 95, 99 (hereafter R.P.C.)Google Scholar; C.S.P., 3, p. 544, no. 699; p. 553, no. 715; Bannatyne, R., Memorials, (Edinburgh, 1936), pp. 108ff.Google Scholar

51. Lang, op. cit., p. 269; Brown, P. H., John Knox (London, 1895), 2, pp. 281ff.Google Scholar

52. Although a number of Edinburgh burgesses were implicated in the murder of Riccio, probably because they felt it necessary to remove him as a threat to the Reformed cause, no proof exists to indicate that Knox had any part in the plot (C.S.P., 2, p. 269, no. 363; R.S.S., 5, p. 2, no. 3149; Lang, p. 246; Fleming, D. H., Mary Queen of Scots (London, 1898), pp. 395ffGoogle Scholar; Ross, A., “Reformation and Repression,” Essays on Scot. Ref., p. 391).Google Scholar

53. Ibid., 1, p. 547, no. 1010; Knox, op. cit., 2, pp. 8ff; see Reid, W. S., “The Battle Hymns of the Lord: The Calvinists' Use of the Psalms,” Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies (St. Louis, Mo., 1971), 2, pp. 36ff.Google Scholar

54. Diurnal, pp. 67f; C.S.P., 1, p. 552, no. 1017.

55. Ibid., 2, pp. 217, 273; R.S.S., 5, p. 2, no. 3149.

56. R.P.C., 14, pp. 21, 45; see also the agreement between the Provost and Kirkcaldy of Grange in 1568 (C.S.P., 4, p. 559, no. 644).

57. Wood, op. cit., p. 29; C.S.P., 2, P. 217, no. 273; Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 48, 63, 207, 228.

58. Ibid., 3, pp. 248, 250, 259, 271.

59. Ibid., 3, pp. 65, 68, 79.

60. Ibid., 3, pp. 82, 85; Angus, op. cit., p. 35.

61. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 79–81.

62. Ibid., 3, pp. 89f; Knox, op. cit., 1, p. 355; Wood, op. cit., p. 3.

63. Ibid., 3, p. 89; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 215.

64. Ibid., 3, pp. 101, 125ff; Diurnal, p. 69; C.S.P., 1, p. 569, no. 1041.

65. Ibid., 1, p. 555, no. 1023; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 148.

66. Ibid., 3, pp. 140f.

67. Ibid., 3, pp. 207, 212, 219ff.

68. Ibid., 3, pp. 252, 264.

69. Knox, op. cit., 2, pp. 28f; Donaldson, G., The Accounts of the Collectors of the Thirds of Benefices (Edinburgh, 1949), pp. xiiiff.Google Scholar

70. Wood, op. cit., pp. 5f.

71. Diurnal, p. 53; Two Missions of de la Brosse, G. Dickinson, ed. (Edinburgh, 1942), p. 91Google Scholar; Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 45, 85.

72. Ibid., 3, p. 68.

73. Marwick, op. cit., p. 50; Knox, op.cit., 2, pp. 331f.

74. See R.S.S., 5, nos. 1956, 1980, 2009, 2381.

75. Ibid., 5, no. 3334.

76. Ibid., 5, nos. 2296, 3146; 6, no. 39.

77. Ibid., no. 3368; Paton, H. M. and Smith, J., “St. Leonard's Lands and Hospital,” B.O.E.C., 23, pp. 111ff.Google Scholar

78. Edin. Recs., 3, p. 244. No doubt it was to facilitate the control of revenues that an inventory was taken in 1565 (Ibid., p. 208).

79. Mss. Co. Records, fo. 125v.; Edin Recs. 3, pp. 30, 40, 42–44. On two occasions members of the council loaned money to the burgh to meet demands of the Congregation, retaining the sacred items committed to them: the arm bone of St. Giles and the silver chandelier, as security (Ibid., 3, pp. 59, 64).

80. Ibid., 3, p. 45; Angus, op. cit., pp. 32f.

81. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 59, 64, 70, 85, 96, 98, 104, 115.

82. Ibid., 3, pp. 62, 63, 65, 114.

83. Ibid., 3, p. 181; Register of the Great Seal, 1546–80, J. Maitland, ed. (Edinburgh, 1886), no. 1611 (hereafter R.G.S.)Google Scholar; R.S.S. 5, nos. 2901, 2918, 3028.

84. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 240f, 245; R.S.S., 6, no. 400.

85. Wood, op. cit., pp. 6f.

86. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 135–137.

87. Ibid., 3, pp. 161, 174, 177.

88. Ibid., 3, p. 210; R.P.C., 1, pp. 487, 494.

89. Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 229, 277–279.

90. Angus, op. cit., pp. 39–40. St. Paul's Work in Edinburgh provides a good example of the use to which a charitable foundation might be put. By 1560 most of the bedesmen seem to have come from burgess families (Wood, M., “St. Paul's Work,” B.O.E.C., (1930), 18, p. 49).Google Scholar

91. Lang, op. cit., p. 170; Wood, “Domestic Affairs,” pp. 6–7.

92. Edin. Recs., 2, pp. 73, 77, 80, 213, 232, 246, 261f; 3, p. 102; Wood, op. cit., pp. 6f.

93. Marwick, op. cit pp. 44f, 50; R.S.S., 5, p. 1, no. 1275; Bryce, op. cit., p. 69; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 246. This was strongly supported by a resolution of the St. Giles Kirk session (see Edinburgh and Leith Documents, Scottish Record Office, R.H. 9/14/8).

94. R.G.S, no. 1802; Edin. Recs., 3, p. 243.

95. Ibid., 3, pp. 180, 192f. It would seem that Adam Fullarton, one of the burgesses and one of Knox's strongest supporters, had brought the order from the Queen and threatened to complain to the Privy Council if the burghal authorities did not take action (pp. 191f).

96. Ibid., 3, pp. 247, 256.

97. Ibid., 2, pp. 48, 179, 185, 192, 210, 218, 241; Anderson, H. M., “The Grammar School of the Canongate,” B.O.E.C., (1935), 20, P. 3.Google Scholar

98. Edin. Recs., 3, p. 66.

99. R.S.S., 6, no. 487.

100. Ibid., no. 589; Edin. Recs., 3, pp. 131f, 149f, 250f.

101. R.S.S., 6, pp. 857, 983, 2824, 2595.