Article contents
The Baptist View of the State
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
Anabaptism, the bête noire of confessional Protestantism, cursed at least once in most sixteenth century confessions of faith from Augsburg and Trent on, classified under the Deformation of the Reformation by Kurtz, and reconsidered by Troeltsch, is now interpreted by Schuster and Franke as the third primary type of Reformation Protestantism. Quiescent Protestantism, otherwise known as Lutheranism, and militant Protestantism, otherwise know as Calvinism, are at present represented as walking down the Reformation board-walk with radical Anabaptism.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1937
References
1 Seventeen times in the Formula of Concord.
2 About 1609.
3 About 1642.
4 McGlothlin, W. J., Baptist Confessions of Faith, 1911, pp. 6–84.Google Scholar
5 Ibid., pp. 91 ff.
6 Ibid., p. 187.
7 Lauer, P. E., Church ana State in New England, Baltimore, 1892, p. 18.Google Scholar
8 Hearnshaw, F. J. C., The Social ana Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of the Sixteenth and the Seventeenth Century, 1926, pp. 32ff.Google Scholar
9 McGlothlin, , op. cit. p. 109. 30 Congregations, A. D. 1651.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., p. 119 ff.
11 Arnold, S. G., History of the State of R. I., 1859, I, p. 293.Google Scholar
12 McGlothlin, , op. cit., pp. 188 ff.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., p. 263.
14 It will be recalled that the Synod of Philadelphia in 1729 qualified its adoption of chapters 20 and 23 of the Westminster Confession by adding “the Synod do unanimously declare, that they do not receive those articles in any such sense as to suppose the civil magistrate hath a controlling power over synods with respect to the exercise of their ministerial authority; or power to persecute any for their religion, or in any sense contrary to the Protestant succession to the throne of Great Britain” (Mode, , Sourcebook and Bibliographical Guide, p. 268).Google Scholar After the formation of the United States, article XXIII, section III, was altered to conform to the new political situation.
When the synod of Congregational churches in Massachusetts, convened by the General Court, constructed the Cambridge Platform in 1648, it stated in point 15:
“Church government and civil government may very well stand together, it being the duty of the magistrates to take care of matters of religion, and to improve his civil authority for observing the duties commanded in the first, as well as in the second table, seeing the end of their office in matters of righteousness and honesty, but also in matters of Godliness. I Timothy 2:12.”
This confirmed the principles of the Westminster Confession regarding the relation between church and state and demonstrated again what was at issue in the struggle for religions liberty.
15 Ibid., p. 306.
16 Ibid., pp. 310 ff.
17 Ibid., p. 352.
18 Ibid., p. 360.
19 Ibid., p. 367.
20 The Eighth Annual Session of the Baptist Congress (Toronto, 1889) devoted a meeting to the relation between state and church. It is interesting to observe that only Canadian Baptists contended for the taxing of church property. Walter Kauschenbusch argued for an interpenetration of the life of church and state, holding that there is a “positive connection which the church must necessarily have with the state. Brethren, I feel sometimes that in our strong statements of the separation between Church and State we have come to gather up our skirts and to act as if the State had no claim on us; that somehow our life as Christians and as citizens can be cut asunder; that on one side we can be Christians and on the other side, we can be citizens. It is not true. We must be the two things at the same time.” Since the World War the various Protestant denominations in the United States have adopted declarations against war. They have been conveniently gathered in Wilcox, F. M., Seventh-Day Adventists in Time of War, Washington, 1936, pp. 399–407.Google Scholar
21 Backus, I., History of the Baptists in New England, 1871, I.Google Scholar, II., see numerous citations in the Index.
22 Arnold, , op. cit., I, p. 490.Google Scholar
23 Ibid., II, p. 85.
24 Ibid., II, p. 86.
25 Asplund, , The Annual Register, 1790Google Scholar; Walker, , Statistical Atlas of U. S., 1870, II, p. 7.Google Scholar
26 Arnold, , op. cit., I, pp. 109ff.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., I, p. 140.
28 Ibid., I, pp. 148f.
29 Ibid., I, pp. 200ff.
30 Lauer, , op. cit., pp. 47f.Google Scholar
31 Arnold, , op. cit., II, pp. 490–496.Google Scholar
32 Rhode Island Colony Records, I, p. 413 (05 17, 1659).Google Scholar
33 Arnold, , op. cit.Google Scholar, see index under slavery.
34 Ibid., I, p. 420.
35 Backus, I., op. cit., I, p. 482, II, p. 513.Google Scholar
36 Arnold, , op. cit., II, p. 337.Google Scholar
37 Ibid., II, p. 249; Mode, P. G., Sourcebook of American Church History, p. 289.Google Scholar
38 Roger Williams died 1684.
39 Arnold, , op. cit., II, pp. 494f.Google Scholar
40 Asplund, , Register for 1790Google Scholar; Walker, , op. cit.Google Scholar
41 Backus, , op. cit., I, p. 126.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., I, p. 384.
43 Augustina, Mary, Sister (Ray), American Opinion of Roman Catholicism in the Eighteenth Century, 1936, p. 56.Google Scholar
44 Backus, I., op. cit., I, pp. 483ff.Google Scholar
45 Lauer, , op. cit., p. 93.Google Scholar
46 Burrage, H. S., “The Contest for Religious Liberty in Mass.,” Papers of the American Society of Church History, 1893, p. 155.Google Scholar
47 Ibid., p. 156.
48 Backus, op. cit., see index.
49 Burrage, H. S., article cited, p. 167.Google Scholar
50 McIlivaine, H. R., The Struggle of Protestant Dissenters for Religious Toleration in Virginia, Baltimore, 1894, p. 7.Google Scholar
51 Thom, W. T.., The Struggle for Religious Freedom in Virginia, Baltimore, 1900, p. 10.Google Scholar
52 Colgate-Rochester Divinity School Bulletin, vol. IV, pp. 87ff.Google Scholar
53 Thom, , op. cit., pp. 19, 21.Google Scholar
54 Beale, , Semple's History of the Baptists in Va., 1894, p. 492.Google Scholar
55 Ibid., p. 51.
56 Ibid., p. 496 (Oct. 1776).
57 Ibid., pp. 53, 496.
58 Ibid., pp. 500–509.
59 Thom, , op. cit., pp. 78f; text on p. 79.Google Scholar
60 Beale, , op. cit., p. 509.Google Scholar
61 Thom, , op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar
62 Beale, , op. cit., p. 510.Google Scholar
63 Backus, , op. cit., II, p. 336.Google Scholar
64 Arnold, , op. cit., II, p. 561.Google Scholar
65 Ibid., II, p. 562.
66 Backus, , op. cit., II, p. 337.Google Scholar
67 Schaff, P., Church and State in the United States, New York, 1888, p. 25.Google Scholar
68 Weeks, S. B., Church ana State in North Carolina, Baltimore, 1893, p. 59.Google Scholar
69 Ibid., p. 488.
70 Schaff, , op. cit., p. 121.Google Scholar
71 Beale, , op. cit., p. 485.Google Scholar
72 Ibid., p. 488.
73 Augustina, Mary, Sister, op. cit., p. 360.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by