Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:22:46.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arius: Twice a Heretic?

Arius and the Human Soul of Jesus Christ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

William P. Haugaard
William P. Haugaard
Affiliation:
General Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Christology was an important element of the earliest Arianism.” So states Raven in the introductory chapters to his study of apollinarianism. This paper will consider the christology of the “earliest′ Arians,” in particular that of Arius himself. Christology has been defined as “the study of the Person of Christ, and in particular of the union in Him of the Divine and human natures.” In the latter “particular” sense, we shall conclude that Arius really had no developed christology. This is not to say, however, that Arius was not christologically concerned in the larger sense of the word; i.e., “the study of the Person of Christ.” It is true to say after Dorner that:

We should be very greatly mistaken … if we were to suppose that the Christological labours had meanwhile been totally suspended: on the contrary, in the case of the thinkers of the Church, Christology was the perennial motive of their trinitarian efforts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 1960 , pp. 251 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Raven, Charles E., Apollinarianism, (Cambridge, 1923), p. 86.Google Scholar

2. Cross, F. L., ed., The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, (Oxford, 1958), p. 278.Google Scholar

3. Dorner, J. A., History of the Development of the Doctrine of the Person of Christ, Eng. tr., Simon (Edinburgh, 1875), vol. III, p. 332.Google Scholar

4. Harnack, Adolph, History of Dogma, Eng. Tr. from 3rd German edition by Speirs, and Millar, , (London, 1898), vol. iv, p. 19.Google Scholar “All that Scripture and tradition assert in reference to the incarnation and the humanity of this being holds good; he truly took a human body (sōma apsuchon); the feelings shewn by the historical Christ teach us that the Logos to whom they attach—for Christ had not a human soul— is a being capable of suffering, not an absolutely perfect being, but one who attains by effort absolute perfection.”

5. Dorner, op. cit., p. 243.

6. Gwatkin, H.M., Studies of Arianism (Cambridge, 1882), p. 2.Google Scholar

7. Kelly, J. N. D., Early Christian Doctrines (New York, 1958), p. 281.Google Scholar

8. Cave, , The Doctrine of the Person of Christ (London, 1925), p. 98.Google Scholar

9. Cross, op. cit., p. 278; D. T. C., Vol. VIII, Col. 1257.

10. Raven, op. cit., p. 178.

11. Hardy, E. R. and Richardson, Cyril, Christology of the Later Fathers, vol. 33 of the Christian Classics, (Philadelphia, 1954), p. 30.Google Scholar

12. Harnack, op. cit., p 146.

13. Dorner, op. cit., p. 518.

14. Theodoret, , Dialogues, 3. Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. III, p. 235.Google Scholar The Greek is taken from Dorner, op. cit., p. 518.

15. Gregory, of Nyssa, , Contra Eunomius, II, 13Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. V, p. 127.Google Scholar

16. Gregory, of Nazianzus, , Epistle ad Cledon; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. VII, p. 440.Google Scholar

17. Kelly, op. cit., p. 282. Taken from Holl, Bibliothek der Symbole, sec. 191. Greek from article by Michel, A. on “Incarnation” in Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique, v. 7, col. 1449. (Paris, 1903–1905).Google Scholar

17a. Gwatkin, op. cit., p. 74 (note).

18. Socrates, , Historia Ecclesiastica, I, 9Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. II, p. 14.Google Scholar

19. Bardy, Gustave, Recherches sur Saint Lucien d'Antioche et son École (Paris, 1936), p. 347.Google Scholar

20. Bardy, op. cit., p. 228f. Eusubius preserves Arius' letter in a letter he wrote to Alexander preserved in the Acts of the Second Council of Nicea; Athanasius, , in De Synodis, 16Google Scholar; Hilary, in De Trinitate, IV, 11–12Google Scholar and in VI, 4; Foebade, in Contra Arian, 8Google Scholar; and Epiphanius, in Haeres, LXIX.Google Scholar

21. Bardy, op. cit., p. 224f.; Epiphanius, , Haeres, LXIXGoogle Scholar; Theodoret, , H. E., I, 4, 63Google Scholar; Epiphanius, the Scholastic, , in Cassiodore's Historia Tripartite, I, 15Google Scholar: the Latin translations are in Migne's, P. L., VII, 1035Google Scholar; and the other in Rev. Benedict. t. XXVI, 1909, p. 95.Google Scholar

22. Athanasius, , Oratione, adv. Ar., I, 5.Google ScholarPNF. ser. 2, vol. IV, pp. 308–9.Google Scholar This is with parallel texts in the Epist. ad episc. Aegypti et Lib., 12 used as the basis for fragments III and half of IV in Bardy, op. cit., pp. 261–2.

23. Richard, M., “S. Athanase et la Psychologie du Christ selon les Ariens,” Mélanges de Science Religieuse t. IV, 1947, pp. 7–9Google Scholar

24. Harnack, op. cit., p. 39.

25. Bardy, op. cit., p. 269. Quotation is from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 51.Google Scholar Parallels in Ep. ad Episc. Aeg. et Lib., 12 and De Synodis, 15.

26. Richard, op. cit., p. 10.

27. Bardy, op. cit., pp. 292–3. Quotation is from Athanasius, Oratione, III, 10.

28. Ibid., p. 265. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 5.Google Scholar Parallel in Ep. ad Episc. Aeg. et Lib., 12.

29. Ibid.

30. Richard, op. cit., p. 10.

31. Bardy, op. cit., p. 262. Quoted from Athanasius, Oratione, I, 9. Tr. PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 311.

32. Ibid., p. 267. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 6.Google Scholar For parallels, see Ep. ad Episc., Aegypt. et Lib., 12; De Decretis, 6; De Sent. Diony., 23. Tr. PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 309.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., p. 264. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 6.Google Scholar

34. Athanasius, , De Synodis, 15Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 457.Google Scholar

35. Bardy, op. cit., p. 275. Quoted from Socrates, , HE, 26Google Scholar; version, Sozomen's is in HE, II, 27.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., pp. 276–7.

37. Athanasius, , Epis. ad Episc. Aegypt. et Lib., 18Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol IV, p. 232.Google Scholar

38. Liebaert, , La Doctrine Christologique de Saint Cyrille d' Alexandre avant la Querelle Nestorienne (Lille, 1951), p. 114.Google Scholar

39. Raven, op. cit., p. 12. Quoted from Justin Martyr, Apol., 2, 10.

40. Ibid, p. 65.

41. Ibid. Quoted from Leontius adv. Nest. et Eutych., III.

42. Kelly, op cit., p. 159

43. Sellers, , Two Ancient Christologies (London, 1940), p. 32.Google Scholar

44. Tomus ad Antioch, 7; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 485.Google Scholar

45. Athanasius, , De Incarn., iv, 44Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 44.Google Scholar

46. Athanasius, , De Decretis, 14Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 158.Google Scholar

47. Athanasius, , Oration adv. Ar., III, 30Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 410.Google Scholar

48. Ibid., III, 51; p. 421.

49. Ibid., III, 30; p. 410.

50. Athanasius, , De Synodis, 28Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 466.Google Scholar

51. Raven, op. cit., p. 113.

52. Sellers, op. cit., pp. 23–4.

53. Richard, op. cit., p. 11.

54. Liebaert, op. cit., p. 239.

55. Bardy, op. cit., p. 280. Quoted from Augustine, , Contra Haeres, 49. Trans. by Muller, , (Catholic University of America, Washington, 1956) :Google Scholar “They are less known for maintaining the error that Christ assumed flesh alone, without a soul. I did not find this argued against them at any time by anyone. But Epiphanius testified to the truth of this, and I have certainly determined it from some of their writings and discourses.”

56. Ibid.Praedestinatus, I, 49. Bardy is of the opinion that whoever its author may be, the work depends directly upon Augustine.

57. Epiphanius, , Anacoratus, 33; ed. Dindorfius, (Lipsiae, 1859), Vol. I, p. 126.Google Scholar Literal translation: “St. Paul broke down the way of the Lucianists and the power of Arius, for Lucian and the Lucianists deny that the Son of God took a soul.”

58. Epiphanius, , Contra Haeres, LXIX, 19; ed. Dindorfius, (Lipsiae, 1861), Vol. III, p. 162.Google Scholar

59. Rufinus, , HE, ix, 6.Google Scholar Bardy refers to Rufinus' use of this statement of Epiphanius.

60. Bardy, op. cit., p. 154.

61. Unsigned article on “Epiphanius” in Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. IX, p. 695.Google Scholar

62. Tixeront, , A Handbook of Patrology, Eng. tr., (St. Louis, 1920), pp. 192–3.Google Scholar

63. Smith, and Wade, , ed., A Dictionary of Christian Biography, (London, 1880), Vol. II, p. 49f;Google Scholar article by A.A. Lipsius.

64. Supra, p. 1.