1. Quoted in Hooft, W. A. Visser't, The Background of the Social Gospel in America (Haarlem: H. D. Tjcenk Willink & Zoon, 1928), p. 10.Google Scholar

2. Ibid., p. 2.

3. Ibid., pp. 2–4.

4. Ibid., pp. 4–5 et passim.

5. Hopkins, Charles Howard, The Rise of the Social Gospel in American Protestantism, 1865–1915 (1940; paperback ed., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), pp. ix, 3, 326–327.Google Scholar

6. Ahlstrom, Sydney E., A Religious History of the American People (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972). pp. 788–789Google Scholar. Winthrop S. Hudson did set some of the facts in ordcr in an article that stresses British influence upon American religion throughout the nineteenth century. See Hudson, , “How American is Religion in America?” in Braucr, Jerald C., ed., Reinterpretation in American Church History (Chicago: University of Chcago Press, 1968), pp. 159–167.Google Scholar

7. Buckham, John Wright, Progressive Religious Thought in America: A Survey of the Enlarging Pilgrim Faith (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1919), p. 4.Google Scholar

8. Welch, Claude, Protestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Volume 1, 1799–1870 (New Haven: Yale Uniersity Press, 1972), pp. 8–9Google Scholar; McGiffert, A. C., Protestant Thought Before Kant (New York: Charles Seribner's Sons, 1912), chapters 9 and 10.Google Scholar

9. Harris, George, A Century's Change in Religion (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1914), pp. viii–ix.Google Scholar

10. Commager, Henry Steele, The American Mind: An Interpretation of American Thought and Character Since the 1880's (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), pp. 168, 176, 164Google Scholar. See also Mead's, Sidney E. “American Protestantism Since the Civil War. 1. From Denominationalism to Americanism,” a lecture first published in 1956 and reprinted as Chapter 8 of Mead's The Liveiy Experiment: The Shaping of Christianity in America (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), especially pp. 136–137, 141.Google Scholar

11. John Feeney, “Seeley's Ecce Homo and the Image of Jesus Christ in England and America: 1865–1871”; Edith Waldvogel, “Matthew Arnold and the Crisis of Faith”; David L. Gollaher, “The Impact of Herbert Spencer on Religion in America and Great Britain, 1865–1900”; Thomas T. Call, “The Legacy of Frederick Denison Maurice in Comparative Perspective”; Samuel M. Johnson, “The Social Gospel in English and Amcrican Methodism” William B. Miller, “;On the Appeal of Frederick William Robertson”; Kenneth Styles, “Anglo- and Roman Catholic Factors in English Modernism.” Unpublished seminar papers, Harvard Divinity School, Fall 1972.

12. Hanson, Kathryn, “The Assimilation of Biblical Criticism in England and America-With Special Reference to the Essays and Reviews Controversy.” Unpublished seminar paper, Harvard Divinity School, Fall 1972.Google Scholar

13. Inglis, K. S., “Patterns of Religious Worship in 1851,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 11 (04 1960): 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. See, for example, Westcott, Brooke Foss, Social Aspects of Christianity (London: Macmillan and Co., 1888), p. 96Google Scholar; Hughes, Hugh Price, Ethical Christianity: A Series of Sermons (London: Sampson Low, Marston and Co., 1892), p. 169Google Scholar; Drummond, Andrew L., German Protestantism Since Luther (London: Epworth Press, 1951), p. 229, and 214–229 passim.Google Scholar

15. In another article I have acknowledged that a similar experience of “loss of meaning” afflicted many American seminarians and young ministers, that in fact this, rather than loss of status or economic position, provided the setting in which scientific and other influences operated upon them. Hutchison, William R.. “Cultural Strain and Protestant Liberalism,” American Historical Review 76 (04 1971): 386–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar. But the experience of English religionists appears to have been more severe and less readily relieved.

16. Cockshut, A. O. J., ed., Religious Controversies of the Nineteenth Century: Selected Documents (London: Methuen and Co., 1966), p. 11.Google Scholar

17. Smyth, Newman, Old Faiths in New Light (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1879)Google ScholarBeecher, Henry Ward, Evolution and Religion (New York: Fords, Howard, and Hulbert, 1885)Google Scholar; Gordon, George A., The Christ of To-day (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1895)Google Scholar; Abbott, Lyman, The Theology of an Evolutionist (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co. 1897).Google Scholar

18. This is discussed in Chapter 1 of Hutehison, William R., The Modernist Impulse in American Protestantism, which is to be published by Harvard University Press in early 1976Google Scholar. Chapters 2 through 6 of the same book enlarge upon the points made about American liberal thought in the balance of this section.

19. Swing, David, David Swing's Sermons (Chicago: W. B. Keen, Cooke, and Co., 1874), p. 85.Google Scholar

20. Munger, Theodore T., The Freedom of Faith (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1883), pp. 11–44, 32.Google Scholar

21. Smyth, Egbert et al. , Progressive Orthodoxy (Boston, 1885), pp. 8–9Google Scholar; Allen, A.V.G., “The Theological Renaissance of the Nineteenth Century,” Princeton Review 10 (11, 1882): 280–281.Google Scholar

22. Editors of the Review, Andover, “Christianity and its Modern Competitors,” Andover Review 6 (11, 1886): 513–514Google Scholar; Briggs, C. A., Whither? (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1889), pp. 260–261.Google Scholar

23. Harris, George, “The Rational and Spiritual Verification of Christian Doctrine,” Chrishan Union 27 (06 14, 1883); 471.Google Scholar

24. Gordon, George A., Ultimate Conceptions of Faith (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1903), p. 249Google Scholar; idem., The New Epoch for Faith (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1901), p. 42.

25. Ibid., p. 361.

26. Vidler, Alec R., Witness to the Light: F. D. Maurice's Message for To-day (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1948), pp. 46–57.Google Scholar

27. The Maurice and Robertson quotes appear, respectively, in Chambers, Talbot W., “The Inaugural Address of Professor Briggs,” Presbyterian and Reformed Review 2 (07 1891): 481Google Scholar, and Tucker, William Jewett, My Generation (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin Co., 1919), p. 61.Google Scholar

28. Maurice, Frederick D., The Ground and Object of Hope for Mankind (Boston, 1868), pp. 17–18, 83–84Google Scholar et passim; Robertson, , Sermons, 2 vols. (Boston, 1857–1859), 1:78–95; 2: 229–43, 312–328Google Scholar; Brooke, Stopford A.. ed., The Life and Letters of Frederick W. Robertson, M.A. (Boston, 1867), 2: 160–161.Google Scholar

29. Temple, Frederick, “The Education of the World,” in Temple, Frederick et al. , Essays and Reviews, 2d. ed.London: John W. Parker and Son, 1860), pp. 40, 49.Google Scholar

30. Seeley, John R., Ecce Homo: A Survey of the Life and Work of Jesus Christ, 2d. ed. (London: Macmillan and Co., 1866), pp. 326–327.Google Scholar

31. Reardon, Bernard M. G., From Coleridge to Gore: A Century of Religious Thought in Britain (London: Longman, 1971), p. 423.Google Scholar

32. Bruce, Alexander B., The Kingdom of God; or, Christ's Teaching According to the Synoptical Gospels (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1889), pp. 133–134, 272Google Scholar; Martineau, James, The Seat of Authority in Religion (London: Longinans, Green, and Co., 1890), p. viGoogle Scholar; Caird, John, The Fundamental Ideas of Christianity, 2 vols. (Glasgow: James MacLehose and Sons, 1899), 1: 196–232; 2: 74–99.Google Scholar

33. Hughes, Hugh Price, Social Christianity: Sermons Delivered in St. James's Hall, London (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1889), pp. viii–x.Google Scholar

34. Westcott, Brooke Foss, Social Aspects of Christianity, 2d. ed. (London: Macmillan and Co., 1888), pp. 150–151Google Scholar. See also ibid., pp. 95–96, and Westcott, , Socialism: A Paper Read at the Church Congress, Hull (London: Guild of St. Matthew, 1890), pp. 6–7, 8.Google Scholar

35. Fremantle, William H., The World as the Subject of Redemption, 2d. ed. (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1895), P. 15Google Scholar; Campbell, R.J., The New Theology (New York: Macmillan 1907), pp. 60–63Google Scholar. The development of the liberal “spiritual religion” that was Campbell's context is treated in an illuminating way by Grant, John W., Free Churchmanship in England, 2870–1940 (London: Indpendent Press Ltd. (1955), pp. 68–168.Google Scholar

36. Campbell was less a threat to American than to English Congregationalist conservatives; and his American visits came before and after, rather than during, his most controvcrsial period.

37. Jones, Peter d' A., The Chrittian Socialist Revival, 1877–1914: Religion, Class, and Social Conscience in Late-Victorian England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968), pp. 421, 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For reviews of Campbell's work and reports on his American tours, see Congregationalist, 9 February, 13 and 27 April, 1907; 4, 18, 25 November and undated Christmas issue, 1911. See also Grant, , Free Churchmanship, pp. 132–142, 206.Google Scholar

38. Fremantle, , World, pp. ix–xGoogle Scholar; Chadwick, Owen, The Victorian Church, 2 vols. (New York: Oxford Universiy Press, 1966, 1970), 2:280.Google Scholar

39. Fremantle, , World, pp. ix–x, xv–xviGoogle Scholar; Peabody, Francis G., Jesus Christ and the Social Question (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1900), pp. 1–15Google Scholar; Rauschenbusch, Walter, Christianizing the Social Order (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1912), pp. 9, 8Google Scholar. Visser 't Hooft exaggerated, however, in saying that Peabody had “practicaily nothing to report about the social interest in the American Churches.” Background, p. 24.

40. Hopkins, , Rise, p. 151Google Scholar. Hopkins' footnote at this point acknowledges that he has made “no systematic study of the influence of English social-gospel thought upon American social Christianity,” yet reiterates, again with no show of support for the assertion, that “in all cases … such foreign stimuli crystallized indigenous strivings.” Ibid., n. 8.

41. May, Henry F., Protestant Churches and Industrial America (1949; Torchbook, ed., New York: Harper and Row, 1967), p. 185.Google Scholar

42. Hopkins, , Rise, p. 318.Google Scholar

43. Among Protestant religious groups claiming more than fifty thousand members in the religious census of 1926, I would consider the northern branches of the Methodist, Baptist and Presbyterian denominations as committed officially to the Social Gospel; also the Episcopalians, Congregationalists, Friends and Unitarians. See U.S. Bureau of the Census, Religious Bodies, 1926, 2 vols. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1930), 1: 15, 82–91.Google Scholar

44. Bell, G.K.A., ed., The Stockholm Conference 1925: The Official Report of the Universal Christian Conference on Life and Work Held in Stockholm, 19–30 August, 1925 (London: Oxford University Press, 1926), pp. 21–25.Google Scholar

45. Ahlstrom, , Religious History, p. 804.Google Scholar

46. Jones, , Christian Socialist Revival, pp. 5–8, 459.Google Scholar

47. Winthrop Hudson remarks that, despite the obvious attractiveness of Fremantle for the purpose of such investigatiorts, there may be more to be said for comparing American figures with such nonconformists as Principal Fairbairn. Letter to the author, 18 October 1974.