Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:50:21.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of some factors on the fusion rate of bovine–rabbit interspecies reconstructed eggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Zhang Xiao-Rong*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Liu Ya
Affiliation:
Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Zhang Yun-Hai
Affiliation:
College of Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
Chen Da-Yuan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
Lian Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
Li Jin-Song
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
Jin Ren-Tao
Affiliation:
Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Zhang Zhi-Guo
Affiliation:
Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Zhang Mei-Ling
Affiliation:
Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Wang Cun-Li
Affiliation:
Animal Science and Technology College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

Abstract

Tests were conducted to highlight the effects of donor cell treatment (bovine G0- and non-G0 phase somatic cells refrigerated for 1–5 or 12–14 days at 4°C), fusion solution (with or without cytochalasin B) and age of the rabbit (young, 3–5-months old; or multiparous, 10–12 months old) as oocyte donor on the fusion and mortality rates of bovine–rabbit interspecies reconstructed eggs. Results showed that there were no significant differences (P>0.05) in fusion and mortality rates of eggs reconstructed with G0 cells or non-G0 cells as nuclear donor somatic cells. The same was also true when nuclear donor somatic cells (G0 cells or non-G0 cells) were treated at low temperature (4°C) for 1–5 or 12–14 days. The fusion rate of reconstructed eggs did not change significantly (P>0.05) when adding cytochalasin B into the fusion solution, but the mortality rate increased significantly (P<0.05). No significant effect (P>0.05) was found in fusion rate of the eggs reconstructed with young rabbits' and multiparous rabbits' oocytes as recipient, but the mortality rate decreased significantly (P<0.01) for young rabbit oocytes compared with multiparous rabbit ones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © China Agricultural University and Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cibelli, JB, Stice, SL & Golueke, PJ (1998) Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Science 280, 12561258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D-Y, Sun, Q-Y, Liu, J-L et al. (1999) The giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca) somatic cell nucleus can dedifferentiate in rabbit ooplasm and support early development of the reconstructed egg. Science in China 42, 346353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, D-Y, Wen, D-C & Zhang, Y-P et al. (2002) Interspecies implantation and mitochondria fate of panda–rabbit cloned embryos. Biology of Reproduction 67, 637642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesne, P, Adenot, PG & Viglietta, C et al. (2002) Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology 20, 366369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dominko, T, Mitalipova, M & Haley, B et al. (1999) Bovine oocyte cytoplasm supports development of embryos produced by nuclear transfer of somatic cell nuclei from various mammalian species. Biology of Reproduction 60, 14961502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, M, Pierson, J & Drolet, M et al. (2001) Sexual maturation and fertility of male Nigerian dwarf goat ( Capra hircus ) clones produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning and Stem Cells 3, 151155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosaka, K, Ohi, S & Anoo, A et al. (2000) Cloned mice derived from somatic cell nuclei. Human Cell 13, 237242.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuhholzer, B, Hawley, RJ & Lai, L et al. (2001) Clonal lines of transgenic fibroblast cells derived from the same fetus result in different development when used for nuclear transfer in pigs. Biology of Reproduction 64, 16951698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J-L, Wang, M-K & Chen, D-Y et al. (2000) Effect of telophase enucleation on bovine somatic nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 54, 989998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loi, P, Ptak, G & Barboni, B et al. (2001) Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology 19, 962964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, T, Kraemer, D & Pryor, J et al. (2002) A cat cloned by nuclear transplantation. Nature 415, 859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, DN, Misica, PM & Tervit, HR et al. (1998) Adult somatic cell nuclear transfer is used to preserve the last surviving cow of the Enderby Island cattle breed. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 10, 369378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmut, I, Schnieke, AE & McWhir, J et al. (1997) Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385, 810813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Kubota, C & Suzuki, H et al. (1998) Control of oocyte maturation in cow?–?biological factors. Theriogenology 49, 471482CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed