Article contents
Writers' Criticism of the Party in 1942
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Extract
The angry outbursts of Chinese intellectuals against the Chinese Communist Party at the time of the Hundred Flowers in 1956–57 revealed that China's intellectuals, even those who were oriented towards the left, were in conflict with many of the Party's practices. Actually, this tension between the Party and the intellectuals had been smouldering for a long time. It had come to the surface many years earlier during the Cheng Feng movement in Yenan in the early 1940s. At that time the Party, as it did later in the Hundred Flowers period, embarked on a drive “to rectify the style of work” of both Party members and intellectuals. One aspect of this drive was that the Party encouraged intellectuals and lower-rank cadres to speak out on the misuses of Party power.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The China Quarterly 1964
References
1 Conrad, Brandt, Benjamin, Schwartz, John, Fairbank, A Documentary History of Chinese Communism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952), p. 338.Google Scholar
2 Chieh-fang Jih-pao (Liberation Daily).Google Scholar
3 Ibid., February 12, 1942.
4 Ibid., January 6, 1942.
5 Liberation Daily.Google Scholar
6 Hsia, C. T., History of Modern Chinese Fiction 1917–1957 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961). Mr. Hsia discusses these works and their authors.Google Scholar
7 Robert, Elegant, China's Red Masters (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1961), p. 160.Google Scholar
8 Nym, Wales, My Yenan Notebooks (printed for private distribution, 1961), p. 156.Google Scholar
9 Liberation Daily, 03 9, 1942, p. 4.Google ScholarPubMed
10 Ibid., March 12, 1942, p. 4.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid., March 13, 1942, p. 4, and March 23, 1942, p. 4.
15 Ibid., March 23, 1942, p. 4.
16 Ibid., March 13, 1942, p. 4.
17 Ibid.
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid., June 6, 1942, p. 4.
20 Ibid., May 26, 1942, p. 4. Liberation Daily printed excerpts of Wang Shih-wei's “Statesmen and Artists.”Google Scholar
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid.
23 Ibid.
24 Ibid.
25 Edgar, Snow, ed., Living China, The Appendix (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1936), p. 397.Google Scholar
26 Liberation Daily, 03 25, 1942, p. 4.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., April 8, 1942, p. 4.
28 Ibid.
29 Ibid.
30 Wen-yi Pao, No. 2, 1958, p. 25. This article was printed in Wen-yi Pao.Google Scholar
31 Ibid.
32 Ibid.
33 Ibid.
34 Ibid., April 3, 1942, p. 4.
35 Ibid., June 8, 1942, p. 4.
36 Ibid., June 28, 1942, p. 4.
37 Ibid., April 23, 1942, p. 1; April 24, 1942, p. 1; April 22, 1942, p. 2.
38 Ibid., April 1, 1942, p. 2.
39 Ibid., May 4, 1942, p. 4.
40 Ibid.
41 Mao, Tse-tung, On Art and Literature (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1960), p. 104.Google Scholar
42 Ibid. p. 113.
43 Wang, Yao, Chung-kuo Hsin Wen-hsüeh Shih-kao (Shanghai: New Literature Publishing Co., 1954), p. 427.Google Scholar
44 Leaders of Communist China, OIR Report, No. 5126, Department of State, Division of Biographic Information, p. 45.Google Scholar
45 Liberation Daily, 06 15, 1942, p. 4.Google Scholar
46 Ibid.
47 Ibid.
48 A diary of these meetings was kept and published in Liberation Daily, 06 28, 1942, p. 4, and June 29, 1942, p. 4.Google ScholarPubMed
49 Liberation Daily, 05 31, 1942, p. 4.Google ScholarPubMed
50 Ibid., June 29, 1942, p. 4.
51 Ibid.
52 Hsia, C. T., A History of Modern Chinese Fiction, 1917–1957, p. 629.Google Scholar
53 Among the articles by prominent Party theorists and intellectuals, criticising Wang Shih-wei, were those of Fan, Wen-lan, Liberation Daily, 06 9, 1942, p. 4Google Scholar and June 11, 1942, p. 4; Chen, Po-ta, Liberation Daily, 06 9, 1942, p. 4Google Scholar and June 15, 1942, p. 4; Chou, Wen, Liberation Daily, 06 16, 1942, p. 4Google Scholar; Chou, Yang, Liberation Daily, 07 28, 1942, p. 4.Google Scholar
54 Liberation Daily, 06 9, 1942, p. 4.Google Scholar
55 Ibid.
56 Ibid., June 28, 1942, p. 4.
57 Ibid.
58 Ibid., June 29, 1942, p. 4.
59 Chou, Yang(Piao-hsien Hsin-te Min-chung te Shih-tai (To Express the New Age of the Masses) (Chia mu ssü, 1948), p. 105.Google Scholar
60 Ibid., p. 32.
61 Ibid., p. 53.
- 1
- Cited by