Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:57:12.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Village Elections and Redistribution of Political Power and Collective Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2009

Abstract

This study of competitive elections in a northern China village identifies two contradictions: one between villagers and village officials, the other between village elite and those seeking power. The one between villagers and the old leadership in the village focuses on the latter's corruption and bad governance, which had led to serious erosion and unfair distribution of the collective property. The one between villagers and the new leadership lies in the latter's failure to address the problems left by the old leadership. Both led to popular discontent and fuelled political participation. The contradiction between elite members focuses on competing for political office, which has resulted in the formation of factions and factionalism in both election and post-election politics and has become a salient feature of the village politics. The investigation of this village with governing problems found that free elections have brought about a radical redistribution of political power, but little satisfaction to villagers because their deep-seated desire for a fair redistribution of the collective property remains unfulfilled.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brien, Kevin J. O', “Implementing political reform in China's villages,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 32 (1994), pp. 3360CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Recently, Rong Hu confirms this view in his study of 40 villages in Fujian by arguing that “village-level economic development is crucial for the implementation of competitive elections.” Hu, Rong, “Economic development and the implementation of village elections in rural China,” Journal of Contemporary China, No. 44 (2005), p. 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Laurence, Susan V., “Democracy, Chinese style,” Journal of Contemporary China, No. 44 (2005), pp. 6168Google Scholar.

3 Oi, Jean C. and Rozelle, Scott, “Elections and power: the locus of decision-making in Chinese villages,” The China Quarterly, No. 162 (2000), pp. 513–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Esptein, Amy, “Village elections in China: experimenting with democracy,” in Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, China's Economic Future (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1997)Google Scholar; Tianjian, Shi, “Economic development and village elections in rural China,” Journal of Contemporary China, No. 22 (1999) pp. 425–42Google Scholar. More recently, David Zweig and Chung Siu Fung share this view. However, they further argue that middle and upper-middle income villagers tend to have democratic values and are not satisfied with economic development and good governance in the village. “Elections, democratic values, and economic development in rural China,” Journal of Contemporary China, No. 50 (2007), pp. 25–45.

5 For a summary of their debate, see Li's, LianjiangThe empowerment effect of village elections in China,” Asian Survey, No. 4 (2003), pp. 648–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Zhong, Yang and Chen, Jie, “To vote or not to vote: an analysis of peasants' participation in Chinese village elections,” Comparative Political Studies, No. 6 (2002) pp. 686712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

6 I stayed altogether 15 days in the village in my three trips and interviewed 35 villagers, including all the members of the current leadership, most former village cadres who were willing to talk and some ordinary villagers. Most of them are male and over 45 years old. Among these, I had long interviews with 15 people, and more than one session with eight of these. I also keep in touch with two of my informants by phone. For village elite, I mean those who have various degrees of power and influence among villagers.

7 Lianjiang Li, “The empowerment effect of village elections,” p. 653. Yong, Xu, “1998 nian yilai cun xuan pingshu” (“Commentary on village elections since 1998”), in Chongqing, Wu and Xufeng, He (eds.), Zhixuan yu cunzhi (Direct Elections and Village Governance) (Yangcheng wanbao chubanshe, 2003), pp. 4059Google Scholar.

8 Most of the 82 Party members are over 50 years old: only eight are under 50. I thought that it must be because of a lack of interest by the younger generation in Party membership. But villagers I interviewed insisted that it was because the Party chief played favouritism and factionalism. It is also important to note that the most active members of the opposition – those continuing to petition to the upper levels of leadership – are all Party members. They certainly think of themselves as having a more important role to play in village politics than ordinary villagers.

9 While in China in general the perpetrators of land encroachment are governments or government officials of different levels, the problem in West Village is more complex. The village chief and Party chief were by no means the only beneficiaries of the unfair and unjust socio-economic order. At present encroachment of land resources take mainly three forms in West Village: a few village toughs continue digging and selling sand belonging to the collective; some farmers have gathered more contract land through legal or illegal transference; and a general delinquency to pay dues on contract land. The villagers' discontent is directed towards the new leadership, which is incapable of addressing the problem, and to the new elite who have benefited much more than average villagers in encroaching on collective property.

10 “Land privatization – another peasant revolution,” Huaxia Express, 22 January 2008, http://www.hxwz.com/my/modules/wfsection/article.php%3Farticleid=18725.