Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:09:11.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power Transition and the Making of Beijing's Policy towards Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2004

Yun-han Chu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few policy domains can come close to Taiwan affairs in exemplifying the way Jiang's reigning authority has been self-extended beyond his official tenure. Fighting for his place in history, Jiang's desire to reset the cross-Strait scoreboard before his full retirement remains strong. Also, the structure of the newly elected SCP clearly reinforces Jiang's ability to cast a long shadow over Hu for some time to come. Hu is thus expected to adhere with great caution to Jiang's updated policy guidelines on Taiwan affairs, as laid out in the retiring general secretary's farewell Party work report to the CCP 16th Congress. Besides, Hu has few incentives not to because the Taiwan affairs portfolio carries excessive risk and a slow return, in addition to being one of the policy areas that he is least prepared for. However, the symbolic significance of the Taiwan issue also means that the generational turnover from Jiang to Hu cannot be considered complete until Hu takes full command over Beijing's policy towards Taiwan.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 176 , December 2003 , pp. 960 - 980
Copyright
© The China Quarterly, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper was delivered at a conference on “New leaders, new China? Where is China headed after the 16th Communist Party Congress?” co-sponsored by Hoover Institution and Institute for National Policy Research, 24–25 January 2003, Hoover Institution, University of Stanford. I thank Harry Harding, David Mike Lampton, Raymond Myers, Susan Shirk and Julia Strauss for their comments and suggestions.