No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
1. Thomas Rawski's generally careful review of China's economic performance, for example, ignores the Ministry figures (as do most western writers). Rawski assumes that the 1965 output was 200 mmt: Rawski, T. “Recent trends in the Chinese economy,” CQ, No. 53 (1973), p. 9Google Scholar , Table 3.
2. Swamy, and Burki, , CQ, No. 41 (1970), p. 59Google Scholar .