Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T19:12:50.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Experimentation as Communication with the Public: Social Policy, Shared Responsibility and Regime Support in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2023

Xufeng Zhu Open the ORCID record for Xufeng Zhu [Opens in a new window]  and
Yan Wang
Xufeng Zhu*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Yan Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Social Statistics, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
*
Corresponding author: Xufeng Zhu; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on policy experimentation has mainly focused on central–local relations; scholars have paid little attention to the interaction between policy experimentation and the public. We argue that policy experimentation can be used by decision makers as an instrument to communicate with the public, facilitating the building of a social consensus regarding controversial policies. We evaluate the effects of the Chinese government's policy experimentation efforts to promote shared responsibility between the state and individuals for the urban pension system on the public's regime support. Evidence from two rounds of a nationwide survey conducted before and after the policy experiment indicates that the policy experimentation has significantly contributed to citizens’ acceptance of their individual welfare responsibility. Moreover, the image-building of governmental responsibility via official news, with varied intensity across regions, consolidates the political trust of residents while posing a challenge to local government credibility in the long run.

摘要

摘要

政策试验的理论传统主要关注中央和地方政府之间的关系。然而，学者们很少关注政策试验与公众之间的互动。我们指出，政策试验可以被决策者用来作为一种与公众进行沟通的工具，帮助在有争议的政策领域建立社会共识。本文评估了中国政府利用政策试验在推动国家和个人对城市养老金共同责任承担方面的效应，以及政策试验对公众的政治信任的影响。两轮全国调查的证据表明，政策试验的实施显著促进了公众对于福利责任在个人承担方面的接受程度。此外，地方政府试图通过官方新闻在不同地区采取不同强度的形象塑造的努力，虽然能够在短期内巩固公众的政治信任，但从长远来看可能会对地方政府的信誉构成挑战。

Keywords

policy experimentationpension policy reformwelfare responsibilitypolitical supportChina政策试验养老政策改革福利责任政治信任中国
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 258 , June 2024 , pp. 400 - 422
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, Catherine, and Stankey, George H.. 2009. Adaptive Environmental Management. Vol. 351. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How deliberation affects policy opinions.” American Political Science Review 98(4), 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Lisa B., Nabatchi, Tina and O'Leary, Rosemary. 2005. “The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government.” Public Administration Review 65(5), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2016. “Targeted for diffusion? How the use and acceptance of stereotypes shape the diffusion of criminal justice policy innovations in the American states.” The American Political Science Review 110(1), 198–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Hongbin, and Treisman, Daniel. 2009. “Political decentralization and policy experimentation.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Neil, and Mol, Arthur P.. 2013. Environmental Governance in China. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Xueyi, and Shi, Tianjian. 2001. “Media effects on political confidence and trust in the People's Republic of China in the post-Tiananmen period.” East Asia 19(3), 84–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, S.A., Reyes, L.F. Lunas, Almazán, R. Sandoval, Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.S.. 2012. “Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 6(1), 78–91.Google Scholar
Cook, Linda J. 2011. Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert H. 2001. “The social construction of an imperative: why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany.” World Politics 53(3), 463–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O. and Sabel, Charles. 2014. “Global experimentalist governance.” British Journal of Political Science 44(3), 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, Galiani, Sebastian and Schargrodsky, Ernesto. 2012. “Reality versus propaganda in the formation of beliefs about privatization.” Journal of Public Economics 96(5–6), 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2012. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Jonas, and Jonsson, Lina. 2011. “The unexpected ‘yes’: explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm.” Transport Policy 18(4), 636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Kirk, Nabatchi, Tina and Balogh, Stephen. 2012. “An integrative framework for collaborative governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Qin. 2006. “The social benefit system in urban China: reforms and trends from 1988 to 2002.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6(1), 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew. 2006. “Television and voter turnout.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(3), 931–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, Doug. 2012. China and Globalization: The Social, Economic and Political Transformation of Chinese Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
He, Baogang, and Warren, Mark E.. 2011. “Authoritarian deliberation: the deliberative turn in Chinese political development.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Pan, and Zhang, Bing. 2018. “Environmental tax, polluting plants’ strategies and effectiveness: evidence from China.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37(3), 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008a. “Policy experimentation in China's economic rise.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008b. “From local experiments to national policy: the origins of China's distinctive policy process.” The China Journal 59, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Spencer, and Humphrey, John. 2009. “The impacts of private food safety standards on the food chain and on public standard-setting processes.” FAO/WHO, http://www.fao.org/3/i1132e/i1132e.pdf.Google Scholar
Hou, Yilin, Ren, Qiang and Zhang, Ping. 2014. The Property Tax in China: History, Pilots, and Prospects. Vol. 1. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Hou, Yilin, Ren, Qiang, Zhang, Ping and Ma, Haitao. 2019. Development, Governance, and Real Property Tax in China. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Haifeng. 2013. “Signal left, turn right: central rhetoric and local reform in China.” Political Research Quarterly 66(2), 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Haifeng. 2018. “The pathology of hard propaganda.” The Journal of Politics 80(3), 1034–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, Dong-Kyun, and Meng, Tianguang. 2016. “The policy–opinion nexus: the impact of social protection programs on welfare policy preferences in China.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(2), 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, John J. 2009. “Maintaining popular support for the Chinese Communist Party: the influence of education and the state-controlled media.” Political Studies 57(3), 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soonhee, and Lee, Jooho. 2012. “E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government.” Public Administration Review 72(6), 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, Pierre F., and Shen, Mingming. 2005. “Reaching migrants in survey research: the use of the global positioning system to reduce coverage bias in China.” Political Analysis 13(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Bo, and Zhong, Yang. 2009. “How did China's transitions impact people's welfare benefits in the reform era?” Journal of Contemporary China 18(62), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Zhonglu, and Wu, Xiaogang. 2018. “Social policy and political trust: evidence from the New Rural Pension Scheme in China.” The China Quarterly 235, 644–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lü, Xiaobo. 2014. “Social policy and regime legitimacy: the effects of education reform in China.” American Political Science Review 108(2), 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund J., Nguyen, Cuong Viet and Tran, Anh. 2014. “The impact of recentralization on public services: a difference-in-differences analysis of the abolition of elected councils in Vietnam.” American Political Science Review 108(1), 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Ciqi, and Liu, Zhilin. 2014. “Experiment-based policy making or conscious policy design? The case of urban housing reform in China.” Policy Sciences 47(3), 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlenbachs, Lucija, Spiller, Elisheba and Timmins, Christopher. 2015. “The housing market impacts of shale gas development.” American Economic Review 105(12), 3633–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Kathleen G., Sabel, Charles F. and Simon, William H.. 2009. “Legal accountability in the service-based welfare state: lessons from child welfare reform.” Law and Social Inquiry 34(3), 523–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change.” World Politics 45(4), 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinby, Laura D. 2020. “Do deferred retirement benefits retain government employees?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 39(2), 469–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Stein, and Ngok, Kinglun. 2017. “What kind of welfare state is emerging in China?” In Yi, Ilcheong (ed.), Towards Universal Health Care in Emerging Economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers-Dillon, Robin H. 2004. The Welfare Experiments: Politics and Policy Evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2012a. “Experimentalist governance.” In Levi-Faur, David (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–196.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2012b. “Experimentalism in the EU: common ground and persistent differences.” Regulation and Governance 6(3), 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1990. “Behavioral assumptions of policy tools.” The Journal of Politics 52(2), 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen M.. 2019. “Social constructions, anticipatory feedback strategies, and deceptive public policy.” Policy Studies Journal 47(2), 206–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Sidney, Mara. 2009. “What is next for policy design and social construction theory?” Policy Studies Journal 37(1), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joanne, and Holder, Jane. 2006. “Law and new environmental governance in the European Union.” In Búrca, Gráinne De and Scott, Joanne (eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 211–242.Google Scholar
Shi, Shih-Jiunn. 2012. “Social policy learning and diffusion in China: the rise of welfare regions?” Policy and Politics 40(3), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Shih-Jiunn, and Mok, Ka-Ho. 2012. “Pension privatisation in Greater China: institutional patterns and policy outcomes.” International Journal of Social Welfare 21, S30–S45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Shunfeng, and Chu, George S.F.. 1997. “Social security reform in China: the case of old-age insurance.” Contemporary Economic Policy 15(2), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Council. 1997. “Guowuyuan guanyu jianli tongyi de qiye zhigong jiben yanglao baoxian zhidu de jueding” (Decision on establishing a unified system of basic pension insurance for enterprise employees) (State Council [1997] No. 26), 16 July, http://www.gov.cn/ztzl/nmg/content_412509.htm. Accessed July 2016.Google Scholar
State Council. 2000. “Guowuyuan guanyu yinfa wanshan chengzhen shehui baozhang tixi shidian fang'an de tongzhi” (The notice of issuing the pilot programme of urban social security system) (State Council [2000] No.42), 25 December, http://www.gov.cn/xxgk/pub/govpublic/mrlm/201011/t20101112_62507.html. Accessed July 2016.Google Scholar
State Council. 2005. “Guowuyu guanyu wanshan qiye zhigong jiben yanglao baoxian zhidu de jueding” (Decision on perfecting the basic system of pension insurance for enterprise employees) (State Council [2005] No.38), 14 December, http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2005-12/14/content_127311.htm. Accessed July 2016.Google Scholar
Sun, Xin. 2020. “Campaign-style implementation and affordable housing provision in China.” The China Journal 84(1), 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelenyi, Ivan, and Kostello, Eric. 1996. “The market transition debate: toward a synthesis?” American Journal of Sociology 101(4), 1082–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as policy laboratories: emulating success in the children's health insurance program.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2), 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Homeyer, Ingmar. 2010. “Emerging experimentalism in EU environmental governance.” In Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121–150.Google Scholar
Vreugdenhil, Heleen, Taljaard, Susan and Slinger, Jill H.. 2012. “Pilot projects and their diffusion: a case study of integrated coastal management in South Africa.” International Journal of Sustainable Development 15(1–2), 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Warren E., Marchau, Vincent A.W.J. and Swanson, Darren. 2010. “Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies. Introduction to section 2.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(6), 917–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yanan, Fang, Xiaoli, Yin, Shiwen and Chen, Wei. 2021. “Low-carbon development quality of cities in China: evaluation and obstacle analysis.” Sustainable Cities and Society 64, 102553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11, 1–31.Google Scholar
Wong, Linda, and Ngok, Kinglun. 2006. “Social policy between plan and market: xiagang (off-duty employment) and the policy of the re-employment service centres in China.” Social Policy and Administration 40(2), 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ri Tu. 2010. “Zuoshi yanglao geren zhanghu wanshan zhidu moshi de yanjiu” (Study on the model: fulfilling the individual accounts of old-age insurance by perfecting the overall system.) Social Security Studies 6, 3–8.Google Scholar
Wyborn, Carina. 2015. “Co-productive governance: a relational framework for adaptive governance.” Global Environmental Change 30, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Yansui, Wang, Wei and Zhang, Man. 2010. “Shehui baoxian jijin anquan yunying jizhi yanjiu – zuoshi geren zhanghu de sikao” (Study on the safety mechanism of individual account pension funds). Chinese Public Administration 5, 61–66.Google Scholar
Zheng, Bingwen. 2015. “Cong zuoshi zhanghu dao mingyi zhanghu – kechixu xing yu jili xing” (From fully funding the individual accounts to nominal account – sustainability and incentives). Research on Development 3, 1–6.Google Scholar
Zheng, G.C. 2016. “Zhongguo shehui baozhang zhengce pinggu” (Evaluation of China's social protection policies). EU–China Social Protection Reform Project, https://www.euchinasprp.eu/images/documents/Component1Cn/2017-assessment-report/EvalSSCn.pdf. Accessed July 2016.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xufeng. 2013. “Policy change and expert involvement in China.” Public Administration 91(2), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xufeng, and Zhang, Youlang. 2019. “Diffusion of marketization innovation with administrative centralization in a multilevel system: evidence from China.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29(1), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xufeng, and Zhao, Hui. 2018. “Recognition of innovation and diffusion of welfare policy: alleviating urban poverty in Chinese cities during fiscal recentralization.” Governance 31(4), 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xufeng, and Zhao, Hui. 2021. “Experimentalist governance with interactive central–local relations: making new pension policies in China.” Policy Studies Journal 49(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zhu and Wang supplementary material

Zhu and Wang supplementary material
Download Zhu and Wang supplementary material(File)
File 57.7 KB