Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:58:50.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Losing Media? An Empirical Study of Defamation Litigation in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2017

Xin He  and
Fen Lin
Xin He
Affiliation:
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China (visiting 2016–2017), and City University of Hong Kong.
Fen Lin*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong.
*
Email: [email protected] (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following a well-established research tradition on court decisions, this study analyses 524 defamation cases in China from 1993 to 2013, explores the media's success possibilities, and investigates the role of party capacity, political influence and the medium effect. Contrary to the existing assertions, we find that the media are not necessarily losing. On average, from 1993 to 2013, the success rate of news media in Chinese defamation courts was 42 per cent, and this rate has been increasing since 2005. We also find that government officials and Party organs had consistent advantages in court, while ordinary plaintiffs, magazines and websites had less success. The medium of the media (i.e. print, broadcast, internet) makes a difference, as do the government policies governing the media. In addition, local protectionism exists, but it is less rampant than expected. These findings compel us to rethink the dynamics among the media, the courts and the state, and their implications on China's institutional resilience.

摘要

延续既有的法庭研究传统, 本文研究 1993 年至 2013 年间 524 起控告媒体的名誉侵权案件, 探讨媒体胜诉概率, 并分析媒体的资源、政治影响和媒介效应对其胜率的影响。与现有看法相反, 我们发现媒体胜率不低。从 1993 年至 2013 年, 新闻媒体在中国名誉侵权案中的平均胜率是 42 %, 且该比率从 2005 年起逐渐提高。在起诉媒体时, 政府官员和党政机关在法庭审判中一直占有优势。而普通原告、杂志和网站则处于相对劣势。不同的媒介 (如报刊、广播、网络) 和政府的媒介管理政策也对媒体的胜诉率产生影响。此外, 在此类案件中, 地方保护主义虽然存在, 但是没有预期中显著。这些实证数据启发我们重新思考媒体、法院和政府之间的动态关系, 及其对中国体制弹性的影响。

Keywords

defamationlibelfreedom of pressmedia–court relationsinstitutional resilienceChina名誉侵权诽谤诉讼新闻自由媒体与法院关系体制弹性中国
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 230 , June 2017 , pp. 371 - 398
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, Burton M. 1991. “Party capability theory as an explanation for intervention behavior in the English court of appeal.” American Journal of Political Science 35(4), 881–903.Google Scholar
Barendt, Eric, Lustgarten, Laurence, Norrie, Kenneth and Stephenson, Hugh. 1997. Libel and the Media: The Chilling Effect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bezanson, Randall. 1986. “The libel suit in retrospect: what plaintiffs want and what plaintiffs get.” California Law Review 74(3), 789–808.Google Scholar
Bezanson, Randall, Cranberg, Gilbert and Soloski, John. 1987. Libel Law and the Press: Myth and Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Susan W. 2007. “Should online defamation be criminalized?” Mississippi Law Journal 76(3), 705–787.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph Man. 1993. “Commercialization without independence: trends and tensions of media development in China.” In Cheng, Joseph and Brosseau, Maurice (eds.), China Review. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press of Hong Kong, 1–21.Google Scholar
Cheer, Ursula. 2008. “Reality and Myth: The New Zealand Media and the Chilling Effect of Defamation Law.” PhD diss., University of Canterbury, Christchurch.Google Scholar
Chen, Xiaoyan, and Ang, Peng Hwa. 2008. “Defamation litigation and the press in China.” International Journal of Communications Law & Policy 12, 53–91.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhiwu. 2004. “The legal dilemma of press freedom: a study on libel cases.” Chinese Lawyers 2, http://dajunzk.com/meitiyanlun.htm. Accessed 27 June 2016.Google Scholar
Cheung, Anne S.Y. 2009. “A study of cyber-violence and internet service providers’ liability: lessons from China.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 18, 323–346.Google Scholar
China Youth Online. 2009. “Henan fayuan yinian 25,167 jian caipan wenshu shangwang” (Henan courts made 25,167 adjudication documents available on the internet within one year), 16 September, http://www.chinanews.com/gn/news/2009/09-16/1868231.shtml. Accessed 27 June 2016.Google Scholar
Dent, Chris, and Kenyon, Andrew T.. 2004. “Defamation law's chilling effect: a comparative content analysis of Australian and US newspapers (U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 94).” Media and Arts Law Review 9(89), https://ssrn.com/abstract=586684. Accessed 27 June 2016.Google Scholar
Du, Aixia. 2011. “Cong meiti qinquan jiufen kan meiti qinquan lifa” (From media tort dispute to media tort laws). China Newspaper Industry 10, 138–39.Google Scholar
Franklin, Marc A. 1981. “Suing media for libel: a litigation study.” Law & Social Inquiry 6(3), 797–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Marc A. 1986. “A declaratory judgment alternative to current libel law.” California Law Review 74(3), 809–845.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard. 1998. “Defamation law in the People's Republic of China.” Transitional Law 11(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change.” Law and Society Review 9, 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. 2006. “Mobilizing the law in China: informed disenchantment and the development of legal consciousness.” Law and Society Review 40, 783–816.Google Scholar
Goodroad, Scott L. 1998. “The challenge of free speech: Asian values v. unfettered free speech, an analysis of Singapore and Malaysia in the new global order.” Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 9(1), 259–318.Google Scholar
Grant, David. 2002. “Defamation and the internet: principles for a unified Australian (and world) online defamation law.” Journalism Studies 3(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
Hao, Xiaoming, and Zhang, Kewen. 1996. “The Chinese press and libel: political and legal implications.” International Communication Gazette 55(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
He, Xin. 2009. “Enforcing commercial judgments in the Pearl River Delta of China.” American Journal of Comparative Law 59(2), 419–456.Google Scholar
He, Xin. 2011. “Debt-collection in the less developed regions of China: an empirical study from a basic-level court in Shaanxi province.” The China Quarterly 206, 253–275.Google Scholar
He, Xin. 2012. “Black hole of responsibility: the adjudication committee's role in a Chinese court.” Law & Society Review 46(4), 681–712.Google Scholar
He, Xin, and Su, Yang. 2013. “Do the ‘haves’ come out ahead in Shanghai courts?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10(1), 120–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitajima, Noriko. 2012. “The protection of reputation in Japan: a systematic analysis of defamation cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 37(1), 89–118.Google Scholar
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Zhou, He and Huang, Yu. 2006. “‘Chinese Party Publicity Inc.’ conglomerated: the case of the Shenzhen Press Group.” Media, Culture & Society 28(4), 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, Benjamin L. 2006. “Innovation through intimidation: an empirical account of defamation litigation in China.” Harvard International Law Journal 47(1), 33–177.Google Scholar
Liebman, Benjamin L. 2011. “The media and the courts: towards competitive supervision?” The China Quarterly 208, 833–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Fen. 2012. “Information differentiation, commercialization and legal reform: the rise of a three-dimensional state-media regime in China.” Journalism Studies 13(3), 418–432.Google Scholar
Lin, Fen, Chang, Tsan-Kuo and Zhang, Xinzhi. 2015. “After the spillover effect: news flows and power relations in Chinese mainstream media.” Asian Journal of Communication 25(3), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubman, Stanley B. 1999. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Media Law Resource Center. 2014. 2014 Report on Trials and Damages. New York: Media Law Resource Center.Google Scholar
Newcity, Michael. 1991. “The sociology of defamation in Australia and the United States.” Texas International Law Journal 26(1), 1–69.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2001. “Seek truth from facts: an empirical study of enforcement of arbitral awards in the PRC.” American Journal of Comparative Law 49, 249–317.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (ed.). 2009. Judicial Independence in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Robert C. 1986. “The social foundations of defamation law: reputation and the constitution.” California Law Review 74(3), 691–742.Google Scholar
Pritchard, David. 2009. “Rethinking criminal libel: an empirical study.” Communication Law and Policy 4(3), 303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullan, Robert. 1994. Guilty Secrets: Free Speech and Defamation in Australia. Glebe: Pascal Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1978. “Fear, risk and the first amendment: unraveling the ‘chilling effect’.” Boston University Law Review 58, 685–732.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald, Kuersten, Ashlyn and Kaheny, Erin. 2000. “Why the haves don't always come out ahead: repeat players meet Amici Curiae for the disadvantaged.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3), 537–556.Google Scholar
Stockmann, Daniela. 2013. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stockmann, Daniela, and Gallagher, Mary E.. 2011. “Remote control: how the media sustain authoritarian rule in China.” Comparative Political Studies 44(4), 436–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Yang, and He, Xin. 2010. “Street as courtroom: state accommodation of labor protests in south China.” Law & Society Review 44(1), 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2014. “ New York Times v. Sullivan around the world.” Alabama Law Review 66, 337–356.Google Scholar
Wei, Yongzheng. 2008. “Zhongguo chuanmei fazhi jianshe 30 nian” (An overview of China's media law over 30 years), Aisixiang, 24 November, http://www.aisixiang.com/data/22496.html. Accessed 27 June 2016.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton, Cartwright, Bliss, Kagan, Robert A and Friedman, Lawrence M.. 1987. “Do the ‘haves’ come out ahead? Winning and losing in state supreme courts, 1870–1970.” Law and Society Review 21, 403–445.Google Scholar
Xu, Xun. 2002. Zhongguo xinwen qinquan jiufende disici langchao (The Fourth Wave of Media Tort Litigation) . Beijing: China Customs Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Xun. 2009. Xinwen meiti qinquan yanjiu xinlun (An Inquiry into News Media Torts) . Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Yan, Meining. 2011. “Criminal defamation in the new media environment: the case of the People's Republic of China.” International Journal of Communications Law & Policy 14, 1–91.Google Scholar
Youm, Kyu Ho. 1992. “Libel law and the press in South Korea: an update.” Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 3(110), 1–23.Google Scholar
Zahralddin-Aravena, Rafael X. 1998. “Chile and Singapore: the individual and the collective, a comparison.” Emory International Law Review 12(2), 739–850.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yuezhi. 1998. Media, Market, and Democracy in China: Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, He. 2000. “Working with a dying ideology: dissonance and its reduction in Chinese journalism.” Journalism Studies 1(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Li, and Yang, Huizhen. 2012. “Challenges and distinctiveness of media tort in China: an empirical study of 800 cases,” Wordpress, 1 June, https://chinacopyrightandmedia.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/final_challenges-and-distinctiveness-of-media-tort-in-china.doc. Accessed 27 June 2016.Google Scholar