Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:03:06.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Indian Factor in Recent Sino-Soviet Relations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

Chinese foreign policy is typically a complex mix of bilateral, regional and global considerations shaped by the perceptions and domestic political concerns of various participants in China's decision-making process. One significant factor shaping Chinese foreign policy over the past decade which has not been given adequate attention is Chinese consideration of South Asia, and especially India. India's size, substantial aggregate national power, central geographic position in South Asia, prominent role in the Third World/Non-Aligned Movement, and the determination of its leaders to establish India as the pre-eminent power in South Asia, have given India significant weight in Chinese foreign policy calculations. This includes, I will argue, Beijing's calculations regarding China's relations with the Soviet Union and the United States.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gupta, Bhabani Sen, The Fulcrum of Asia (New York: Pegasus, 1970)Google Scholar. Sathi, , ”The strategic triangle: (1) India,” Survey, No. 54, (01 1965), p. 107Google Scholar; Siegel, Richard L., ”Chinese efforts to influence Soviet policy to India,” Indian Quarterly, Vol. xxiv, No. 3, (0709 1968), pp. 223–25Google Scholar. Regarding India's role in the Sino-Soviet conflict over the Non-Aligned Movement in the 1950s and 1960s see Pauker, Guy J., ”The rise and fall of Afro-Asian solidarity,” Asian Survey, Vol. 5, No. 9, (09 1965), pp. 427–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Regarding the late 1960s see Seth, S.P., ”Sino-Indian relationships: changing perspectives,” Problems of Communism, Vol. 23, No. 5, (0304 1974), p. 25Google Scholar; Simon, Sheldon W., ”China, the Soviet Union, and the subcontinental balance,” Asian Survey, Vol. 13, No. 7, (07 1973), pp. 647658CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Renmin ribao (People's Daily), 5 February 1978.

3. Regarding Chinese perceptions and policy at this juncture see China and Asia–An Analysis of China's Recent Policy Toward Neighboring States (Report by the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, March 1979), pp. 38–39. Harris, Lillian Craig, ”China and the northern tier: shoring up the barrier to Soviet southward expansion,” Contemporary China, Vol. 3, No. 4, (Winter 1979), pp. 2227Google Scholar.

4. Gandhi, Arun, The Morarji Papers, Fall of the Janata Government (New Delhi: Vision Books, 1983), p. 27Google Scholar. This book is based upon Desai's personal papers

5. For example, Indian general election and Soviet setback in South Asia,” PekingReview, No. 14, (8 04 1977), pp. 2324Google Scholar.

6. New York Times, 24 June 1977, p. A6; 12 June 1978, p. A6.

7. New York Times, 12 June 1978, p. A6.

8. Chun-chuan, Shen, ”Cong Yindu waichang fangwen Zhonggong kan shuang fang guanxi de weilai fazhan” (”Looking at the future development of Sino-Indian relations from the perspective of the Indian foreign minister's visit to Communist China”), Wenti yu yanjiu (Issues and Studies) (Taibei), Vol. 18, No. 6, (03 1979), pp. 4350Google Scholar.

9. Regarding bilateral developments during these years see ibid. Also Baral, J.K. and Mohapatra, J.M., ”Sino-Indian peace efforts: evolution of variables,” Foreign Affairs Reports (Government of India), Vol. xxxi, No. 5, (05 1982), pp. 8198Google Scholar.

10. Deshingkar, G.D., ”India–China: the security dimension,” China Report, Vol. 15, No. 2, (0304 1979), pp. 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Thakur, Ramesh, ”India's Vietnam policy, 1946–1979,” Asian Survey, Vol. 19, No. 10, (10 1979), p. 971CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Chanda, Nayan, Brother Enemy, The War After the War (New York: Collier Books, 1986), p. 356Google Scholar.

13. Gandhi, , The Morarji Papers, p. 29Google Scholar.

14. Ibid. pp. 38–39.

15. Ibid.

16. Singh, Nihal S., The Yogi and the Bear: the story of Indo-Soviet Relations (London: Mansell, 1986), p. 146Google Scholar.

17. New York Times, 14 March 1979, p. A10.

18. Gandhi, , The Morarji Papers, pp. 34, 37Google Scholar.

19. Ibid. pp. 40–42, 105–106, 110, 122–23, 154, 171. Regarding Soviet efforts to destabilize Desai, see also Swamy, Subramaniam, “The bear hug,” The Illustrated Weekly of India, 17 03 1985, pp. 1417Google Scholar.

20. Moscow's dumb-bell strategy,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 8, (25 02 1980), pp. 89Google Scholar. Moscow's southward thrust menaces the Third World,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 19, (12 05 1980), pp. 2425Google Scholar. Afghanistan, what's Moscow after?” and “Soviet military strategy for world domination,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, (25 01 1980), pp. 910, and 15–19, 26Google Scholar.

21. See Syed, Anwar Hussain, China and Pakistan, Diplomacy of an Entente Cordiale (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1974)Google Scholar. Vertzberger, Yaacov, The Enduring Entente, Sino-Pakistan Relations, 1960–1980 (New York: Praeger, 1983)Google Scholar.

22. Indian-Pakistan talks, mutual understanding of great significance,” Beijing Review, No. 7 (18 02 1980), pp. 1314Google Scholar. Regarding Soviet pressure on Pakistan see Ali, Mehrmnisa, “Soviet-Pakistan ties since the Afghanistan crisis,” Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 9, (09 1983), pp. 1026–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Daily Report China, (hereafter FBIS, DRQ, 8 May 1980, pp. F4–5.

24. FBIS, DRC, 16 January 1980, p. 3. Facts on File, 1980, p. 31.

25. FBIS, DRC, 23 January 1980, pp. Fl–2.

26. FBIS, DRC, 19 March 1980, p. F3. Also, Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Daily Report South Asia, (hereafter FBIS, DRSA), 22 April 1980, p. F2.

27. FBIS, DRC, 5 May 1980, p. F8.

28. Ahman, Naveed, “Sino-Pakistan relations (1971–1981),” Pakistan Horizon (Karachi), Vol. 34, No. 3, (1981), p. 70Google Scholar.

29. Armstrong, J.D., Revolutionary Diplomacy, Chinese Foreign Policy and the United Front Doctrine (Berkeley: University of California Press), p. 170Google Scholar.

30. Copper, John F., “China's military assistance,” in Copper, John and Papp, Daniel (eds.), Communist Nations Military Assistance (Boulder: Westview, 1983), p. 110Google Scholar.

31. For example, Huang Hua's January 1980 press conference in Karachi. FBIS, DRC, 23 January 1980, p. F2.

32. FBIS, DRC, 8 May 1980, p. F4. Also, “Pakistan's best friend.”

33. For example, Renmin ribao, commentator, An understanding of major significance,” (regarding a three-day visit by India's foreign secretary to Pakistan), in Beijing Review, No. 7, (18 02 1980), pp. 1314Google Scholar.

34. Ping, Guo, “India and Pakistan face common problems,” Beijing Review, No. 26, (26 01 1989), pp. 1314Google Scholar. The same article cited statements by ex-prime minister Moraji Desai to the effect that Moscow had urged India to “teach Pakistan a lesson.”

35. “Indian-Pakistan talks, mutual understanding of great significance,” pp. 13–14.See also Soviet, Vietnamese and Cuban lobbying missions in Asia,” “Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 17, (28 04 1980), p. 11Google Scholar.

36. Garver, John W., ”Chinese-Indian rivalry in Indochina,” Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 17, (28 04 1980), p. 11Google Scholar.

37. Ibid. p. 1213. No. 11, (November 1987), pp. 1205–219.

38. FBIS, DRC, 21 April 1980, p. El.

39. See Zagoria, Donald S., “Soviet policy and prospects in East Asia,” InternationalSecurity, Vol. 5, No. 2, (Fall 1980), pp. 6677Google Scholar.

40. Robinson, Thomas W., “The Soviet Union and Asia in 1981,” Asian Survey, Vol. 22, No. 1, (01 1982), pp. 2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41. China and India to improve relations,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 5, (4 02 1980), p. 4Google Scholar.

42. See The China Quarterly, No. 24, (1012 1965), p. 172Google Scholar.

43. Harris, , “China and the northern tier,” p. 24Google Scholar.

44. Vajpayee report to the Lok Sabha, 21 February 1979, in Keesings, Vol. 27, No. 43 (1981), p. 31153Google Scholar.

45. A thaw in the Himalayas,” Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 108, No. 28, (4 07 1980), pp. 2627Google Scholar.

46. Ahmad, Naveed, “Sino-Pakistan Relations,” p. 73Google Scholar.

47. For example, a major Chinese statement on the Kampuchean issue dealing at length with UN and NAM considerations of that issue avoided mentioning India. The Kampuchean Issue-its origin and major aspects,” Supplement to Beijing Review, Vol. 26, No. 37, (12 09 1983), pp. i–xxivGoogle Scholar.

48. A foolish decision,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 28, (14 07 1980), p. 15Google Scholar.

49. Brezhnev's India trip,” Beijing Review, Vol. 23, No. 51, (22 12 1980), pp. 810Google Scholar.

50. Guo Ping, “India and Pakistan face common problems.”

51. Sino-Indian Relations,” Beijing Review, Vol. 24, No. 16, (20 04 1981), pp. 9, 14Google Scholar.

52. Premier Zhao on current international issues,” Beijing Review, Vol. 24, No. 24, (15 06 1981), p. 9Google Scholar.

53. Times of India, 28 June 1981.

54. Renmin ribao, 28 June 1981.

55. Regarding relations during the 1980–84 period see Jetly, Nancy, “Sino-Indian relations; a quest for normalization,” India Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 1, (0103 1986), pp. 5668Google Scholar. Also, Chun-chuan, Shen, “Peking-New Delhi relations in recent years,” Issues and Studies, (Taibei), Vol. 22, No. 3, (03 1986), pp. 141152Google Scholar.

56. Renmin ribao, , commentator, “Indian newspaper rumour,” Beijing Review, Vol. 24, No. 39, (28 09 1981), p. 14Google Scholar.

57. Usvatov, Alexander, “China-India: after the first round of talks,” New Times, 03 1982Google Scholar, cited in Horn, Robert C., “The Soviet Union and Sino–Indian relations,” Orbis, Vol. 26, No. 4, (Winter 1983), pp. 900901Google Scholar.

58. Overseas Hindustan Times, 7 October 1982, 30 September 1982, cited in Horn, ”The Soviet Union,” p. 905.

59. Robinson, , “The Soviet Union and Asia”, p. 26Google Scholar. Also Horn, , “The Soviet Union,”p. 906Google Scholar.

60. Mukerjee, Dilip, “India and the Soviet Union,” Washington Quarterly, Spring 1986, pp. 115–17Google Scholar.

61. Moscow attempts to sow discord between India and China,” Beijing Review, Vol. 25, No. 22, (31 05 1982), p. 11Google Scholar.

62. For example, Zagoria, Donald S., “The Moscow-Beijing detente,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 61, No. 4, (Spring 1983), pp. 859873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHamrin, Carol Lee, “China reassesses the superpowers,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 2, (Summer 1983), pp. 209231CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Robinson, Thomas W., “Choice and consequence in Sino–American relations,” Orbis, Vol. 25, No. 1, (Spring 1981), pp. 2951Google Scholar. Garver, John W., “Arms sales, the Taiwan question, and Sino-U.S. relations,” Orbis, (Winter 1983), pp. 9991035Google Scholar.

63. FBIS, DRC, 25 October 1983, pp. W2–3.

64. FBIS, DRC, 12 November 1983, pp. Fl–2.

65. FBIS, DRC, 5 November 1985, p. Fl.

66. See Renmin ribao, 18 May 1983, in FBIS, DRC, 19 May 1983, p. Fl. Beijing Review, No. 52, (27 09 1982), p. 3Google Scholar. Liaowang, No. 17, (23 04 1984), pp. 810Google Scholar. Shijie Zhishi, 1 04 1985, No. 7, p. 12Google Scholar, in FBIS, DRC, 12 April 1985, p. Fl. Renmin ribao, 26 July 1985, in FBIS, DRC, 5 August 1985, pp. Fl–2.

67. Chuchuan, Liu, “Reviewing Sino-Indian friendship,” Shijie Zhishi, in FBIS, DRC, 12 04 1985, p. FlGoogle Scholar.

68. Renmin ribao, 3 December 1984, p. 6.

69. The Hindustan Times, 31 December 1984, p. 1.

70. “Interview with Romesh Bhandari,” The Illustrated Weekly of India, 13 April 1986, pp. 16–17.

71. ”The resignation story,” India Today, 15 March 1986, p. 44. Parthasarathy had been one of Indira Gandhi's key foreign policy advisers and implementors. Regarding Parthasarathy's political orientation see, The 25 most powerful people in India,” Imprint, Vol. xxv, No. 1, (04 1985), p. 19Google Scholar.

72. FBIS, DRC, 1 April 1985, p. Fl.

73. Jetly, , ”Sino-Indian relations,” p. 59Google Scholar.

74. FBIS, DRC, 16 May 1985, p. Fl.

75. Mohanty, Manoranjan, “Indian-Chinese relations: a positive frame,” Indian Quarterly, Vol. xli, No. 1, (0103 1985), pp. 1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76. Kun, Wang, “New trends in Indian diplomacy,” Renmin ribao, in FBIS, DRC, 3 08 1985, p. FlGoogle Scholar.

77. Hindustan Times, 24 October 1985. FBIS, DRC, 28 October 1985, p. FR1.

78. Pari, Rajinder, “The Great Leap Forward,” The Illustrated Weekly of India, 17 11 1985, p. 57Google Scholar.

79. FBIS, DRC, 30 October 1985, p. Fl.

81. FBIS, DRSU, 28 October 1985, p. D4.

82. FBIS, DRSU, 31 October 1985, p. Dl.

83. FBIS, DRC, 31 October 1985, p. Fl.

84. FBIS, DRSU, 16 June 1986, pp. Dl–2.

85. FBIS, DRSU, 29 July 1986, p. R12.

86. Mansingh, Surjit and Irvine, Steven I., “China and India: moving beyond confrontation,” Problems of Communism, Vol. xxxviii, (0303 1989), pp. 4144Google Scholar. ”Eyeball to eyeball on the Himalayan border,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 9 04 1987, pp. 3840Google Scholar. ”Tension on the border,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 7 May 1987, pp. 33–35.

87. For example, “China exposes chinks in Indian defence,” Organizer (New Delhi; this is a tabloid linked to the Bharatiya Janata Party), 27 07 1986, p. 1Google Scholar. ”Another round of talks or war?”, Blitz (New Delhi; this is a popular Soviet-supported tabloid), 26 07 1986, p. 9.Google ScholarSingh, S.P., “Old China is dead; new alive and threatening,” The Hindustan Times, (New Delhi), 31 07 1986, p. 20Google Scholar. “Chinese intentions in the east,” The Statesman, 24 07 1986, p. 8Google Scholar.

88. Organizer, (New Delhi), 7 09 1986, p. 1Google Scholar.

89. Soviet Review, Vol. xiii, No. 35, (4 09 1986), pp. 2021Google Scholar.Soviet Review is published by the Soviet embassy in New Delhi. See also the article by Soviet ambassador Rykov, V. N, “Fifteen years of Indo-Soviet treaty,” in New Age (the organizational paper of the Communist Party of India), 10 08 1986, p. 9Google Scholar.

90. Chanda, Nayan, “Heading for a conflict,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 4 06 1987, pp. 4243Google Scholar. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, China-India Border Friction, Background Information and Possible Implications, No. 87–514F, 19 06 1987, p. 6.

92. New York Times, 1 December 1986, p. 10.

93. FBIS, DRSU, 2 December 1986, p. 2.

94. Ibid., pp. D2–D29.

95. CRS, China-Indian Border Friction, p. 1.

96. “The second honeymoon,” p. 49.

97. Liaowang, 15 December 1986, inFBIS, DRC, 19 December 1986, p. C2.

98. CRS, China-India Border Friction, p. 7Google Scholar.

99. “Chronology of Sino-Soviet relations viewed,” FBIS, DRC, 17 February 1989,p. 11. This move had been forecast in Gorbachev's July 1986 Vladivostok speech. 100. Discussions of author with Indian diplomats in Bering April–May 1990. Far Eastern Economic Review, 9 April 1987, pp. 39–40. Dutta, Sujit, “Sino-Indian Relations: Some Issues,” Strategic Analysis (New Delhi), Vol. 11, No. 11 (02 1988), pp. 12391264Google Scholar. Hongwei, Wang, “Chenggong de er fu you chengguo de fangwen,” (“A successful visit with plenty of results”), Nanya yanjiu (South Asian Research) (Beijing), 1989, No. 2 (general No. 35), pp. 7880Google Scholar.

100. FBIS, DRC, 14 October 1988, p. 1.

101. Ali, Salamat, “A shot in the arm,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 1 12 1988, p. 38Google Scholar. New York Times, 19 November 1988, p. 5.

102. Tongchang, Gui, “Gorbachev affirms special friendship,” Beijing Review, (5–11 12 1988), p. 16Google Scholar.

103. FBIS, DRSU, 23 December 1988, p. 8.

104. FBIS, DRSU, 27 December 1988, pp. 7–8.

105. FBIS, DRC, 23 December 1988, pp. 11–12.

106. Hongyu, Wang, “Sulian dui Yindu yuanzhu biekan” (“Analysis of Soviet aid to India”), Guoji wenti yanjiu (International Studies), No. 1, 1988, p. 33Google Scholar.

107. FBIS, DRSU, 2 December 1986, p. D7.