Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:22:09.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of Pollution Control Targets in China: Has a Centralized Enforcement Approach Worked?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

Xuehua Zhang*
Affiliation:
Sichuan University. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

The scholarly work on China's environmental regulations in the context of “central–local” relations is dominated by the preference for a centralized approach. This article examines a centrally imposed and executed verification programme of locally reported pollution data, a rare and sustained central effort to enforce an environmental policy, namely the national pollution reduction target system. The programme was established in 2007 to curtail perceived widespread data falsification and to enhance the quality of emission data, the basis for assessing local compliance with targets. Based on an analysis of official documents and interviews with environmental officials and industry representatives, this article found that the verification programme appears to have reduced the overreporting problem with emission data, enhanced local monitoring and enforcement capacity, and to a certain degree deterred violations due to the increased frequency of national and local inspections. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain. Verification is highly resource intensive, it has involved little external oversight and public participation, the central authority has exerted significant yet unchecked discretionary powers, and poor data quality has remained an issue. Over time, the verification programme appears to have turned into essentially a “numbers game.” All those challenges indicate that a centralized enforcement approach is arguably ineffective in addressing China's long-standing problem of weak environmental policy implementation. This study also sheds lights on the classical “principal-agent” theory in the study of public bureaucracy. Not only does the principal distrust the agent, which is the main concern of the theory, but the agent also distrusts the principal.

摘要

现有的从“中央-地方”关系的角度探讨中国环境规制的研究中, 多数倾向于采用中央集中式管理模式。这篇论文以污染减排制度为切入点, 分析中央自 2007 年以来采纳的”自上而下“的中央集中式减排核查机制。该机制的设置是为了有效遏制遍及全国的数据造假, 提高作为评估减排效果基础的排放达标数据质量, 正好为深入研究中央集中式规制模式提供了一个很好的实践范本。该研究收集相关的官方资料, 走访中央和地方环保官员以及企业管理层, 在分析相关数据的基础上发现, 中央集中式核查机制减少了虚报 (报高) 排放数据的问题, 提高了地方环境监测和执法能力, 并在一定程度上减少了企业违法排污行为, 这是由中央和地方现场监察频率的增加带来的威慑作用所致。尽管如此, 该中央集中式核查机制存在不少问题: 核查机制耗费大量资源, 核查过程缺乏外在的监督机制和公众参与, 中央部门行使了显著的、同时也缺乏约束的自由裁量权, 环境数据质量仍然是一个问题。长期而言, 核查机制已逐步演变成 “数据游戏”。这些问题意味着中央集中式模式不是解决中国长期存在的环境执法弱的有效办法。这项研究还对广泛适用于研究公共政府机构的经典的“委托 - 代理”理论有重要的启示作用, 分析结果不仅展示了传统理论主要关注的委托人不信任代理人这一状况的存在, 也发现存在代理不信任委托人的情况。

Type
Special Section on Central–Local Relations and Environmental Governance in China
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardach, Eugene, and Kagan, Robert A.. 1982. Going by the Book. The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
CAEN (China Atmospheric Environmental Network). 2 April 2015. “Vice Minister of the Ministry of Environmental Protection: Falsification of Environmental Monitoring Data Still Exists in Some Localities.” http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4NDQ2NTcwNw==&mid=205944040&idx=1&sn=07b3cb5bfbeb3cbae16769648175f94f&scene=1#rd. Accessed 3 June 2015.Google Scholar
CEW (China Economic Weekly). 14 September 2010. Interview with Zhao Hualin, Director-General of Total Emission Control Department at Ministry of Environmental Protection, “Environmental officials: China has achieved its 11th Five-Year emission-reduction targets.” http://finance.sina.com.cn/g/20100914/00098649951.shtml. Accessed 26 March 2015.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, Martin K. 2009. Piracy and the State. The Politics of Intellectual Property Rights in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edin, Maria. 2003. “State capacity and local agent control in China: CCP cadre management from a township perspective.” The China Quarterly 173, 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008. “From local experiments to national policy: the origins of China's distinctive policy process.” The China Journal 59, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahiel, Abigail R. 1998. “The organization of environmental protection in China.” The China Quarterly 156, 757787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostka, Genia. 2015. “Command without control: the case of China's environmental target system.” Regulation & Governance 10(1), doi: 10.1111/rego.12082.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1), 165179.Google Scholar
MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection). 2011. “Accounting methods of supervision factors of total emission reduction control during the 12th FYP,” issued on 31 December 2011, http://www.sdein.gov.cn/hjjc/hjjc_1062/201112/t20111231_177333.html. Accessed on 4 April 2015.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2009. “Riots and cover-ups: counterproductive control of local agents in China.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 31, 53123.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2006. “Xinfang: an alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions.” Stanford Journal of International Law 42, 103179.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2006. “Political control and the power of the agent.” The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 22(1), 129. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewj011. Google Scholar
Moore, Scott. 2011. “Shifting power in central-local environmental governance in China: the regional supervision centers.” China Environmental Series 11, 188193.Google Scholar
NSB (National Statistical Bureau). 2004. China Statistical Yearbook 2004. China Statistics Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
NSB (National Statistical Bureau). 2010. China Statistical Yearbook 2010. China Statistics Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 2001. A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism. Resources for the Future. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Price, Lynn, Levine, Mark D., Zhou, Nan, Fridley, David, Aden, Nathaniel, Lu, Hongyou, McNeil, Michael, et al. 2011. “Assessment of China's energy-saving and emission-reduction accomplishments and opportunities during the 11th Five-Year Plan.” Energy Policy 39(4), 2165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ran, Ran. 2013. “Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China's local environmental politics.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15, 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreifels, Jeremy, Fu, Y.L. and Wilson, E.J.. 2012. “Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-Year Plans and lessons for the future.” Energy Policy 48, 779789.Google Scholar
TEC (Total Emission Control Department, Ministry of Environmental Protection). 2008. Practical Handbook of Total Emission Reduction Management of Major Pollutants. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin. 2006. Regulating Land and Pollution in China. Lawmaking, Compliance, and Enforcement: Theory and Cases. Leiden: Leiden University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin, and Lo, Carlos W.H.. 2010. “A fragile convergence, understanding variation in the enforcement of China's industrial pollution law.” Law & Policy 32(1), 1437.Google Scholar
Wang, Alex L. 2013. “The search for sustainable legitimacy: environmental law and bureaucracy in China.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 37, 365440.Google Scholar
Wang, Jinnan. 2013. “A review of the development of environmental planning over last 40 years in Mainland China,” http://www.grm.cuhk.edu.hk/eng/news/confnews/iees/confppt/Day1/WangJinnan.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2015.Google Scholar
Wang, Qiang, and Chen, Yong. 2010. “Energy saving and emission reduction revolutionizing China's environmental protection.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 14, 535–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Christine, and Karplus, Valerie. 2017. “China's war on air pollution: can existing governance structures support new ambitions?The China Quarterly, special section “Central–local relations and environmental governance in China.”Google Scholar
Wilson, John D. 1996. “19%. Capital mobility and environmental standards: is there a theoretical basis for a race to the bottom?” In Baghwati, Jagdish and Hudec, Robert (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 393420.Google Scholar
Xinhua Net (3 June 2007). “General work plan of energy conservation and emission reduction.” http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2007-06/03/content_6191519.htm. Accessed on 12 September 2015.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R., Guttman, D., Qi, K., Bachus, D., Belis, D., Cheng, H.G., Lin, A. et al. 2015. “Institutionalized governance processes: comparing environmental problem solving in China and the United States.” Global Environmental Change 31, 163173.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xuehua. 2001. Institutional Constraints on China's Environmental Enforcement: the Perspective of Local Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) Personnel. MA thesis, Western Washington University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xuehua. 2004. “Environmental enforcement and compliance capacity building in China,” policy brief to the annual Senior Policy Advisory Council at the ministerial level in China. Beijing: China Sustainable Energy Program.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xuehua. 2008. Enforcing Environmental Regulations in Hubei Province, China: Agencies, Citizens, and Courts. PhD diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xuehua, and Schreifels, Jeremy. 2011. “Continuous emission monitoring systems at power plants in China: improving SO2 emission measurement.” Energy Policy 39, 7432–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar