Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:55:36.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ideology of Scholarship : China's New Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Harold Kahn  and
Albert Feuerwerker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article is a report on the conference on historiography in Communist China convened by The China Quarterly at Ditchley Park near Oxford, September 6–12, 1964. Many of the papers will appear in forthcoming issues of this Journal and will be published in book form next year. Professor Feuerwerker served as chairman of the conference, Mr. Kahn as its rapporteur.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 22 , June 1965 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This report represents in general form and without specific acknowledgment of individual contributions to the discussions a consensus of views expressed at the conference. The authors alone of course are responsible for the form those views take here.

1 Quoted in Jen-min Jih-pao (People's Daily), 06 18, 1963.Google Scholar We have not been able to see the original articles by Liu, some of which appeared in the Canton bi-monthly Hsueh-shu Yen-chiu (Academic Studies), No. 1, 1962; Nos. 2, 3, 1963.Google Scholar

2 Kuang-ming Jih-pao (Kuang-ming Daily), 11 10, 1963.Google Scholar

3 Chou, Yang, “The Fighting Task Confronting Workers in Philosophy and the Social Sciences,” Peking Review, 01 3, 1964.Google Scholar

4 New China News Agency, Peking, November 24, 1963.Google Scholar

5 See Kuang-ming Daily, 01 23, 1963;Google ScholarHsin Chien-she (New Construction), No. 1, 1962.Google Scholar

6 Ning, K'o, “Lun Li-shih-chu-i Ho Chieh-chi Kuan-tien” (“On Historicism and the Class Viewpoint”), Li-shih Yen-chiu (Historical Research), No. 4, 1963.Google Scholar

7 Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung (Eng. ed., London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1954–1956), Vol. II, p. 259; emphasis added.Google Scholar

8 The most recent study of traditional historiography is Beasley, W. G. and Pulleyblank, E. G., eds., Historians of China and Japan (London: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

9 See Levenson, Joseph R., “The Place of Confucius in Communist China,” The China Quarterly, No. 12, 10-12, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 For a review of the accomplishments in modern history see Albert, Feuerwerker and Cheng, S., Chinese Communist Studies of Modern Chinese History (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

11 See Cheng, Te-k'un, Archaeology in China, 3 vols. to date (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959 et seq.).Google Scholar

12 For a discussion of some of these see Fairbank, John K. and Mary, Wright, et al., “Documentary Collections on Modern Chinese History,” Journal of Asian Studies, 11 1957.Google Scholar

13 For the early debates see Schwartz, Benjamin I., “A Marxist Controversy in China,” Far Eastern Quarterly, 02 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 The Marxist-nationalist dichotomy and its effects on the substance of current historiography is examined more closely in Albert Feuerwerker, “China's History in Marxian Dress,” American Historical Review, 01 1961.Google Scholar

15 See ibid.