Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:21:34.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Han and Tibetan Residential Patterns in Lhasa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

Ethnic conflict remains surprisingly persistent throughout the world. The persistence is particularly surprising in socialist countries, where one might have thought that the narrowing of income gaps between all ethnic groups, the favoured investment projects in ethnic minority regions, the official emphasis on equal education and occupational opportunity (often in favour of minority groups), and affirmativeaction programmes to ensure that ethnic minorities were well-represented in national congress and official positions would have provided significant new contacts and created new relationships among ethnic groups.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This survey was sponsored by the Institute of Sociology, Beijing University, and the Centre of Tibetology of China.

2. Karan, P.P., The Changing Face of Tibet (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1976)Google Scholar; Bista, Dor Bahandur, Report from Lhasa (Kathmandu: Sahayogi Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Epstein, I., Tibet Transformed (Beijing: New World Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Grunfeld, A.T., The Making of Modern Tibet (New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1987), pp.164175Google Scholar.

3. Avedon, J.F., In Exile from the Land of Snows (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984), pp. 288293Google Scholar; Goldstein, M. and Beall, C., Nomads of Western Tibet (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), pp. 140–44Google Scholar.

4. Dreyer, J.T., China's Forty Millions (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976), p.170Google Scholar.

5. Taeuber, K., “Negro residential segregation: trends and measurements,” in Pettigrew, T.F. (ed.), The Sociology of Race Relations (New York: The Free Press, 1980), p. 280Google Scholar; Zanden, J.W.V., American Minority Relationships (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1983 (4th ed.)), p. 227Google Scholar; Wilson, F.D. and Taeuber, K.E., “Residential and school segregation: some tests of their association,” in Bean, F.D. and Frisbie, W.P. (eds.), Demography of Racial and Ethnic Groups (New York: Academic Press, 1978), pp. 5178Google Scholar; Shannon, L.W., Minority Migrants in Urban Communities (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1973)Google Scholar.

6. Statistical Bureau of Tibet, (ed.), Xizang zizhiqu shehui jingji tongji nianjian (Yearbook of Social and Economic Statistics of the Tibet Autonomous Region) (Lhasa: People's Press of Tibet, 1989), pp. 139141Google Scholar.

7. Goldstein, M., A History of Modern Tibet (1913–1951) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), pp. 2430Google Scholar.

8. Statistical Bureau of Tibet, , Yearbook, pp. 140–41Google Scholar. This number does not include military forces.

9. Zanden, , American Minority Relationships, p. 227Google Scholar; Luhman, R. and Gilman, S., Race and Ethnic Relations (Belmont: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 1980), p. 162Google Scholar.

10. Zanden, , American Minority Relationships, pp. 230–31Google Scholar.

11. Horowitz, D.L., Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 669Google Scholar.

12. Gordon, M., Assimilation in American Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964), pp. 7173Google Scholar.

13. Glazer, N. and Moynihan, D.P., Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970 (2nd ed.)), p. 203Google Scholar.

14. Gordon, , Assimilation in American Life, pp. 7080Google Scholar.

15. Song, Yougong (ed.), Zhongguo renkou: Nei Menggu fence (China's Population: Inner Mongolia) (Beijing: Press of Finance and Economy in China, 1987), p. 372Google Scholar.

16. Pye, L.W., “Ethnic minorities in China,” in Glazer, N. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.), Ethnicity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975), pp. 489497Google Scholar.

17. Gordon, , Assimilation in American Life, pp. 7071Google Scholar.

18. Yin, Ma (ed.), Zhongguo shaoshu minzu (Minority Nationalities in China) (Beijing: People's Press, 1981), p. 18Google Scholar; Weihan, Li, Tongyizhanxian he minzuwenti (United Front and Ethnic Nationalities) (Beijing: People's Press, 1981), pp. 549555Google Scholar.

19. Nagata, J., “In defense of ethnic boundaries: the changing myths and charters of Malay identity,” in Keynes, C.F. (ed.), Ethnic Change (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1981), p. 92Google Scholar.

20. Simpson, G.E. and Yinger, J.M., Racial and Cultural Minorities (New York: Plenum Press, 1985 (5th ed.)), pp. 309315CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Xiaotong, Fei, “The pattern of pluralistic organic whole of the Chinese nation,” Beijing daxue xuebao (Journal of Beijing University), No. 4 (1989), pp. 1617Google Scholar.

22. Sullivan, T., “Racial-ethnic differences in labor force participation: an ethnic stratification perspective,” in Bean and Frisbie, Demography of Racial and Ethnic Groups, pp. 166–67Google Scholar.

23. Yin, Ma, Minority Nationalities, pp. 1416Google Scholar; Connor, W., The National Question in Marxist-Leninist Theory and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 254277Google Scholar.

24. In the Chinese urban system (city-town-rural) Xiang is classified as rural, although the size of the population and the extent of residential concentration of some sites are actually quite large, especially in coastal areas. See Rong, Ma, “The development of small towns and China's modernization,” Zhongguo shehui kexue (Social Sciences in China), No. 4 (07 1990), pp. 131146Google Scholar.

25. Labapingcuo, (ed.), Xizang zizhiqu gaikuang (General Situation of the Tibet Autonomous Region) (Lhasa: People's Press of Tibet, 1984), p. 42Google Scholar; Quzhachilie, , Xizang fengtuzhi (The Natural Conditions and Social Customs in Tibet) (Lhasa: People's Press of Tibet, 1985), p. 78Google Scholar.

26. Farley, R., “Residential segregation in urbanized areas in the United States in 1970: an analysis of social class and racial differences,” Demography (11 1977), p. 500Google Scholar; Wilson, and Taeuber, , “Residential and school segregation,” pp. 5178Google Scholar.

27. Massey, D.S. and Denton, N.A., “The dimensions of residential segregation,” Social Forces, Vol. 67, No. 2 (1988), p. 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28. Taeuber, K.E. and Taeuber, A.F., Negroes in Cities (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1965)Google Scholar. If the counting unit is too small (an extreme example would be using a household) the result would be a complete segregation; if too large (e.g. the city) the result would be a complete integration.

29. The calculation formula in this study is:

ti and hi are the number of Tibetans and Han in One unit household; T and H are the total tibetans and Han within the relative district Office.

30. Rong, Ma and Naigu, Pan, “Residential patterns, social communications, and the relationship between the Han and Mongolians in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia,” Zhongguo shehui kexue, No. 3 (05 1989), p. 185Google Scholar.

31. Simpson, and Yinger, , Racial and Cultural Minorities, pp. 259262Google Scholar.

32. Karan, , The Changing Face of Tibet, pp. 6568Google Scholar.

33. There were only two middle schools in Tibet in 1959, then four in 1965and55in 1979(Labapingcuo, , General Situation, pp. 518522)Google Scholar. The percentage of the population with a middle school education or above was 0.32 in China as a whole (Han comprise 92% of the total population of China) compared with 0.07 in the Tibet Autonomous Region in 1990 (Renmin ribao, 21 November 1990).

34. Rui, Liu (ed.), Zhongguo renkou: Xizang fence (China's Population: Tibet) (Beijing: Press of Finance and Economy of China, 1988), pp. 152–53Google Scholar.

35. Figures from incomplete registration show a total of 52,800 temporary migrants in Tibet from other provinces during June-August 1985, with 51% from Sichuan, 4% (1,850) from Jiangsu and 3% (1,670) from Fujian Province (ibid. p. 153).

36. These stores are rented to and registered in the name of their relatives who have permanent jobs in work units in Lhasa, so the government can find them for tax collection purposes, and to maintain the good condition of the properties.

37. A small group of Hui businessmen are from Gansu Province. They usually stay with relatives or friends in the Hui neighbourhood in Hebalin Resident Committee under Jire District Office.

38. The work of repairing and rebuilding Tibetan-style houses in the old urban district is taken care of by local Tibetan construction teams, which are enterprises and usually managed by local authorities.

39. Simpson, and Yinger, , Racial and Cultural Minorities, p. 343Google Scholar.

40. Wilson, and Taeuber, , “Residential and school segregation,” p. 52Google Scholar.

41. Chapman, F.S., Lhasa: The Holy City (London: R. & R. Clark Limited, 1940), p. 151Google Scholar.

42. Karan, , The Changing Face of Tibet, pp. 5556Google Scholar.

43. Rui, Liu, China's Population: Tibet, p. 69Google Scholar.

44. The three famous monasteries (Drepung, Sera and Ganden) are located in suburbs about 5.5, 3 and 20 miles away from the city respectively (Goldstein, , A History of Modern Tibet, p. 24)Google Scholar.

45. Chapman, , Lhasa, pp. 150170Google Scholar; Zuen, Fa, Xiandai Xizang (Modern Tibet) (Beijing: Eastern Press, 1943), p. 35Google Scholar; Karan, , The Changing Face of Tibet, p. 55Google Scholar.

46. This is the traditional way to use empty monasteries. Tengyeling monastery was destroyed after it had sided with the central government in 1912, and the remains of the buildings were used as the post office in the 1930s (Chapman, , Lhasa, p. 151)Google Scholar.

47. Karan, , The Changing Face of Tibet, pp. 5658Google Scholar.

48. In 1951 the “Agreement on measures for the peaceful liberation of Tibet” was I signed by delegates of the central government and the local government of Tibet (ibid. pp. 89–91).

49. China Population Information and Research Centre, China's Fourth National Population Census Data Sheet (Beijing: CPIRC, 1991)Google Scholar.