Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
The future of the reforms in China ultimately depends on whether, and if so to what extent, reforms introduced in the recent past have improved the consumption and the standard of living of the Chinese people. It also depends on whether any such gains in the standard of living have been widely spread among the whole population. Since 1978 real per capita consumption in China has risen at an average annual rate of 7 per cent which is more than three and a half times that of the preceding 21 years. As a result, the standard of living of the average Chinese citizen in 1990 was more than double that of 1978. However, the growth of consumption and the living standard was rather uneven during the reform period. During the first phase of the reforms (1978–85) the consumption standard increased rapidly without widening existing income disparity. During the second phase (1985–90), however, improvements in consumption standards slowed significantly amidst rising inflation and growing income inequality. The question is whether the recent trend of a relatively slow rise in the standard of living and greater income disparity will continue in the 1990s. The purpose of this article is to examine the recent trends and changes in the level, structure and differentials of Chinese consumption and living standards, and to assess their prospects for the 1990s
1. See Lardy, Nicholas R., “Consumption and living standards in China, 1978–83,” in The China Quarterly, No. 100 (12 1984), pp. 849–865.Google Scholar
2. 2000 nian Zhongguo de renmin xiaofei (2000 China's People Consumption) (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1988), p. 108.Google Scholar
3. Since
where C stands for consumption, Y, national income, NMP, net material product and P, population, hence
4. Pryor, F. L., A Guidebook to the Comparative Study of Economic Systems (London: Prentice Hall, 1985), pp. 56, 58.Google Scholar
5. ZGTJNJ 1991, p. 269.Google Scholar
6. United Nations, Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 13Google Scholar. The author is grateful to D. Doessel for drawing his attention to this reference.
7. Davis, Deborah, “Chinese social welfare policies: policies and outcomes,” The China Quarterly, No. 119 (09 1989), pp. 577–597.Google Scholar
8. Perkins, D. H., “Reforming China's economic systems,” Journal of Economic Literature (06 1988), pp. 624–25.Google Scholar
9. Burki, S. J., “Development strategies for poverty alleviation,” Asian Development Review, No. 1 (1990), p. 17.Google Scholar
10. Zhongmin, Wang, “Wo guo manzu jiben xuqiu de zhidu xuanze” (“The choice of basic needs satisfaction system in our country”) Jingji yanjiu ziliao, No. 3 (1989), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
11. Tisdell, C. A., Economic Development in the Context of China: Policy Issues (London: Macmillan, forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. “Zhufang zhidu gaige shizai bixing” (“Housing reform is inevitable”), Jingji yanjiu ziliao, No. 16 (1988), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
13. China's Urban Household Income and Expenditure Survey Data, 1988 (Beijing: Zhongguo tongji chubanshe, 1989), p. 21.Google Scholar
14. Income elasticity estimates are based on Engel function
where ei and E stands for ith expenditure items and total expenditures per capita respectively, and pi and P are the corresponding price deflators. Since b is relatively small when ei is defined as a broad category in Table 6, income elasticity between year t and t-1 can be directly estimated as
See Mizoguchi, T., “Statistical indicators defining poverty levels using Japanese examples,” The Philippine Economic Journal, No. 2 (1980), p. 101.Google Scholar
15. Kueh, Y. Y., “Food consumption and peasant incomes in the post-Mao era,” The China Quarterly, No. 116 (12 1988), pp. 634–670 at p. 652.Google Scholar
16. Lardy, , “Consumption and living standards,” pp. 853–56.Google Scholar
17. Shengmin, Yang, Zhongguo xiaofei moshi de xuanze (Choice of Chinese-style Consumption Model) (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kezue chubanshe, 1989), p. 157.Google Scholar
18. Lardy, , “Consumption and living standard,” pp. 862–63Google Scholar; ZGTJNJ 1990, pp. 113 and 815.Google Scholar
19. Podkammer, L., “Estimates of disequilibria in Poland's consumer markets, 1965–1978,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1982, pp. 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Shengmin, Yang, Choice of Chinese-style Consumption Model, p. 224.Google Scholar
21. ZGTJNJ 1990, p. 324.Google Scholar
22. Nominal instead of real per capita income is considered here because of the unavailability of price indexes for most of the poorest provinces (Yunnan, Guizhou, Gansu and Qinghai).
23. Perkins, , “Reforming China's economic systems,” p. 639.Google Scholar
24. Nanto, D. K., “Poverty incidence in Japan,” The Philippine Economic Journal, No. 2 (1980), p. 153.Google Scholar
25. Urban Household Income and Expenditure Survey Data, p. 23.Google Scholar
26. See the assessment of China's population growth and accumulation rate in the articles by Robert Ash and K.C. Yeh in this issue.
27. See Baipeng, Lin et al. , Zhongguo xiaofei jiegouxue (Studies of Chinese Consumption Structure) (Beijing: Jingji kexue chubanshe, 1987)Google Scholar, and Lluch, C. et al. , Patterns in Household Demand and Saving (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
28. Podkammer, , “Estimates of disequilibrium,” p. 425.Google Scholar
29. This conversion rate is derived from 2000 China's People's Consumption, p. 223.Google Scholar
30. The seed rate used to derive the demand for seed is taken from Crook, F. W., “China's grain production to the year 2000,”Google ScholarUSDA, China: Agriculture and Trade Report, 06 1988, p. 31.Google Scholar
31. For the prospects of achieving the planned target of food grain production in 2000 see the article by Robert Ash in this issue.