Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:28:53.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confucian China and its Modern Fate. Vol. Ill: The Problem of Historical Significance. By Joseph R. Levenson. [London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul, 1965. 180 pp. 25s.]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Maurice Meisner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 30 , April 1967 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trotsky was especially fond of drawing the analogy between Bonapartism and Stalinism. He intended it to be a devastating critique of Stalin. Others may take it as a slur on Napoleon.

2 Schwartz, Benjamin, “Stalinism or ‘Chineseness’” Problems of Communism, 09–10, 1966, p. 18Google Scholar .

3 For an incisive critique of “functionalist” approaches to the study of Chinese communism, see Schwartz, Benjamin, “Modernisation and the Maoist Vision,” The China Quarterly, No. 21 (01–03, 1965), pp. 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar .