Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
The end of the Cold War has seen the revival throughout the world of nationalist sentiments and aspirations. In China, the rapid decay of Communist ideology has led the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to emphasize its role as the paramount patriotic force and the guardian of national pride in order to find a new basis of legitimacy to sustain its role. However, nationalist sentiment is not the sole province of the CCP and its propagandists. One truly remarkable phenomenon in the post-Cold War upsurge of Chinese nationalism is that Chinese intellectuals became one of the driving forces. Many well-educated people - social scientists, humanities scholars, writers and other professionals - have given voice to and even become articulators for a rising nationalistic discourse in the 1990s. This nationalistic sentiment contrasts strikingly to the anti-traditionalism that once dominated Chinese intellectual circles in the 1980s, in spite of the fact that some advocates of this new sentiment are the same people who had a “pro-Western complex” and promoted anti-traditionalism earlier. This article seeks to discover what caused such a dramatic shift by examining the relationship between Chinese intellectuals′ quest for national greatness and the emergence of nationalistic writing in the 1990s. It starts with a historical analysis of the development of antitraditionalism, and goes on to investigate the content of nationalistic argument. Then socio-economic, intellectual and personal causes for the rise of nationalistic writing are explored. The conclusion offers a perspective on continued intellectual debate over nationalistic discourse.
1. See for example, Song, Chen (ed.), Wusi qianhou dongxi wenhua wenti lunzhan wenxuan (Selected Works from the Debate on Eastern-Western Culture from the Time of May Fourth)(Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1989)]Google Scholar; and Rongqu, Luo (ed.), Congxihua dao xiandaihua (From Westernization to Modernization)(Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1990)]Google Scholar. Examples of Western scholarship, see Schwartz, Benjamin I., In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West(New York: Harper, 1964)]Google Scholar; Levinson, Joseph R., Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968)]Google Scholar; and Oksenberg, Michel and Goldstein, Steven, “The Chinese political spectrum,” Problems of Communism,Vol. 21, No. 2 (March-April 1972), pp. 1–13.]Google Scholar
2. For one systematic description of the cultural fever, see Xiuyi, Wu, Zhongguo wenhua re (China′s Cultural Fever) (Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1988)]Google Scholar. Chen Kuide, the former chief-editor of Shixiangjia (Thinker)in Shanghai and an active participant in the cultural fever wrote an excellent article “Wenhua re: beijing, sichao ji liangzhong qingxiang” (“The cultural fever: background, ideology and two tendencies”), in Chen Kuide (ed.), Zhongguo dalu dangdai wenhua bianqian (Contemporary Cultural Changes in Mainland China)(Taipei: Guigan chubanshe, 1991), pp. 37–61.]Google Scholar
3. Goldman, Merle, Link, Perry and Wei, Su, “China′s intellectuals in the Deng era: loss of identity with the state,” in Dittmer, Lowell and Kim, Samuel S. (eds.), China′s Quest for National Identity(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), p. 143.]Google Scholar
4. In addition, Dushu (Readings),an old liberal monthly, also carried many articles on the debate during 1984–1989.]Google Scholar
5. The script writers of River Elegyare Su Xiaokang and Wang Luxiang. An English translation of the script by Wakeman, Frederic is included in Ogden, Susanne, Hartford, Kathleen, Sullivan, Lawrence and Zweig, David (eds.), China′s Search for Democracy(Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1993), pp. 37–44.]Google Scholar
6. Su Xiaokang revealed this message explicitly later when he went to exile in the United States after the Tiananmen Incident in 1989. See Xiaokang, Su, “Dangdai Zhongguo de wenhua jinzhang” (“The cultural tension in contemporary China”), in Kuide, Chen (ed.), Zhongguo dalu dangdai wenhua bianqian (Contemporary Cultural Changes in Mainland China) (Taipei: Guigan chubanshe, 1991), pp. 21–35.]Google Scholar
7. Shiyu, Zhao, “On the theory of history in River Elegy,” Guangming ribao,10 August 1988.]Google Scholar
8. Shuqing, Zhang, “Marxism, Confucianism, and cultural nationalism,” in Lin, Zhiling and Robinson, Thomas W. (eds.). The Chinese and Their Future(Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press, 1994), pp. 104–105.]Google Scholar
9. Madsen, Richard, China and the American Dream(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), p. 199.]Google Scholar
10. Xiaobo, Liu, “China′s neo-political conservatism in the 1990s,” China Strategic Review, Vol. 1, No. 9 (1996), p. 11.]Google Scholar
11. For one systematic critique of anti-traditionalism, see Xin, Gu, Zhongguo fan chuantongzhuyi de pinkun (The Poverty of Chinese Anti-Traditionalism)(Taipei: Fengyun shidai chubanshe, 1993).]Google Scholar
12. Shuqing, Zhang, “Marxism, Confucianism, and cultural nationalism,” p. 106.]Google Scholar
13. When the Communist Party′s propaganda apparatus denounced “American imperialism,” it rendered that term in a kind of Chinese shorthand - meidi -which literally means “beautiful imperialist.” In his book by that title, David Shambaugh carefully documents this ambivalence in writings of China′s officially sponsored “American watchers.”]Google Scholar See Shambaugh, David, Beautiful Imperialist(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).]Google Scholar
14. Qiang, Song, Zangzang, Zhang and Bian, Qiao, Zhongguo keyi shuo bu (The China That Can Say No)(Beijing: Zhonghua gongshang lianhe chubanshe, 1996).]Google Scholar
15. Kang, Liu, Xiguang, Li et at, Zai yaomohua Zhongguo de beihou (Behind the Scene of Evilizing China)(Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1996).]Google Scholar
16. Barme, Geremie R., “To crew foreigners is patriotic: China′s avant-garde nationalists,” in Unger, Jonathan (ed.), Chinese Nationalism(Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996), p. 187.]Google Scholar
17. Zaiping, Liu, “Summary of a seminar on new authoritarianism,” Guangming ribao,24 March 1996.]Google Scholar
18. For a collection of debate articles, see Me, Qi (ed.), Xin quanwei zhuyi: dui Zhongguo dalu weilai mingyun de lunzheng (New Authoritarianism: A Debate for the Future of Mainland China) (Taipei: Tangshan chubanshe, 1991)]Google Scholar. For a collection of English translation articles on this debate, see Rosen, Stanley and Zou, Gary (eds.), “The Chinese debate on the new authoritarianism,” Chinese Sociology and Anthropology,Winter 1990–1991.]Google Scholar
19. See, for example, Wansheng, Huang, “Questions and answers on the criticism of new authoritarianism,”Wenhui bao,22 February 1989]Google Scholar; Zunxin, Bao, “Confucian ethics and the four little dragons of Asia,” Wenhui bao,12 May 1988.]Google Scholar
20. For one systematical analysis of neo-conservatism, see Fewsmith, Joseph, “Neoconservatism and the end of the Dengist era,” Asian Survey,Vol. 35, No. 7 (July 1995), pp. 635–651.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. He Xin′s articles are collected in Zhonghuafuxing yi shijie weilai (Renovation of China and the Future of the World)(two vols.) (Chengdu: Sichuan renmin chubanshe, 1996), and Wei Zhongguo shenbian (Defending China)(Jinan: Shandong youyi chubanshe, 1996).]Google Scholar
22. This article was first published in the name of the Ideology and Theory Department of the Zhongguo qingnianbao (China Youth Daily)as an internal circulating article in September 1991. It quickly leaked abroad and was reprinted in the December 1992 issue of Zhongguo zhi chun (China Spring)in New York City. I interviewed one of the authors of this article in Beijing during the summer of 1994. He confirmed the above speculation that it was written based on the proceedings of a meeting held in Zhongguo qingnian baoand the participants were a group of Party and government officials active in policy analysis and consultants for the post-Tiananmen leadership.]Google Scholar
23. This book was published by Shanxi renmin chubanshe under the name of a fictitious author, “Europe′s most influential Sinologist” by the name of “Leninger,” with Wang listed only as the translator. Many reviewers, including those writing in PRC media, immediately questioned the book′s authorship. Wang later acknowledged his authorship in an article published in the well-connected Hong Kong journal Ming pao yuekanon 1 November 1994.]Google Scholar
24. Fewsmith, “Neoconservatism and the end of the Dengist era,” pp. 644–645.]Google Scholar
25. Gongqin, Xiao, “Minzuzhuyi yu Zhongguo zhuanxin shiqide yishi xingtai (”Nationalism and ideology in China during the period of transformation“), Zhanlue yu guanliNo. 4 (1994), pp. 21 25]Google Scholar, and ”Zhongguo minzuzhuyi de lishi yu qianjing“ (“History and prospect of nationalism in China”), Zhanlue yu guanli,No. 2 (1996), pp. 58–62.]Google Scholar
26. Gongqin, Xiao, “Zhongguo minzuzhuyi de lishi yu qianjing,” p. 62.]Google Scholar
27. Baoyun, Yi, “Minzuzhuyi yu xiandai jingji fazhan” (“Nationalism and modern economic development”), Zhanlue yu guanli. No. 3 (1994).]Google Scholar
28. Angang, Hu and Shaoguang, Wang, Zhongguo guojia nengli baogao (A Report on China′s State Capacity)(Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1994).]Google Scholar
29. For one study of this “Mao fever,” see Friedman, Edward, “Democracy and ‘Mao fever’,” Journal of Contemporary China, No. 6 (1994), pp. 84–95.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. My visits to China in 1994, 1995 and 1996 found that one of most discussed topics among my intellectual friends was Zeng Guofan.]Google Scholar
31. Li Xiguang and Liu Kang,“A look at the coverage of China by the mainstream U.S. media,” Zhongguo jizhe (The Chinese Journalist),15 May 1996, p. 19. For an English translation of this article, see FBIS-CHI-96–147, 30 July 1996, pp. 4–8.]Google Scholar
32. Shijie, Guan, “Cultural collisions foster understanding,” China Daily, 2September 1996, p. 4.]Google Scholar
33. Xiguang, Li and Kang, Liu, “A look at the coverage of China by the mainstream U.S. media,” p. 21.]Google Scholar
34. Shijie, Guan, “Cultural collisons foster understanding,” p. 4.]Google Scholar
35. The Chinese Strategy and Management Research Society is affiliated to the headquarters of Military General Staffs. So it is speculated that Zhanliie yu guanliis funded by or represents the view of the Chinese military. My interviews found that this journal is run largely by a group of intellectuals who borrowed the military influence to support their work.
36. Jilin, Xu, “Wenhua rentong de kunjing: jiushi niandai Zhongguo zhishifenzi de fanxihua sichao” (“The dilemma of cultural identities: Chinese intellectuals’ anti-Westernization ideological trend in the 1990s”), Zhanlue yu guanli, No. 18 (1996), p. 100.]Google Scholar
37. For their works, see Yiwu, Zhang, “Xiandaixi de Zhongjie: yige wufa huibi de keti” (“The end of the modernization: an inevitable issue”), Zhanliie yu guanli, No. 3 (1994)]Google Scholar; and Xiaoming, Chen, “Dongfangzhuyi yu houzhimin wenhua” (“Orientalism and post-colonial culture”), Zhongshan, No. 1 (1994).]Google Scholar
38. Said, Edward W., Orientalism(New York: Vintage Books, 1979).]Google Scholar
39. Zhiyuan, Cui, “Zhidu chuangxin yu dierzhi sixiang jiefang” (“System innovation and the second thought liberation”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-first Century), No. 8 (1994), and “Mao Zedong wenge lilun de deshi yu xiandaixing de chongjian” (“Mao′s idea of cultural revolution and the reconstructing of Chinese modernity”), Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences,No. 7 (Spring 1996).]Google Scholar
40. Hong, Sheng, “Shenme shi wenming” (“What is civilization”), Zhanliie yu guanli,No. 5 (1995)]Google Scholar; “Cong minzuzhuyi de tianxiazhuyi” (“From nationalism to cosmopolitanism”), Zhanliie yu guanli,No. 1 (1996); and “Jingjixue tiaozhan xifang” (“Economics challenges the West”), Dongfang,No. 1 (1996).]Google Scholar
41. For one Chinese scholar′s analysis on the social background of the rise of anti-Westernism in the 1990s, see Liping, Sun, “Huiru shijie zhuliu wenming: minzuzhuyi santi” (“Merging into the mainstream civilization in the world: three topics on nationalism”), Dongfang, No. 1 (1996).]Google Scholar
42. Huntington, Samuel, “The clash of civilizations,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 3 (Summer 1993).]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Jisi, Wang (ed.), Wenming yu guoji zhengzhi: Zhongguo xuezhe ping Huntingdun de Wenming chongtu lun (Civilization and International Politics: Chinese Scholars on Huntington′s Clashes of Civilization)(Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1995).]Google Scholar
44. Zhong, Shi (Wang Xiadong), “Weilai de chongtu” (“Future conflicts”), Zhanliie yu guanli, No. 1 (1993), pp. 46–50.]Google Scholar
45. Zhong, Shi, “Zhongguo xiandaihua mianlin de tiaozhan” (“The challenges to China′s modernization), Zhanliie yu guanli,No. 1 (1994).]Google Scholar
46. Shijie, Guan, “Cultural collisions foster understanding,” p. 4.]Google Scholar
47. Feng, Chen, Xingyan, Zhao, Jiaoyu, Huang, Mingjie, Yang and Xixing, Yuan, ZhongMei jiaoliang daxiezheng(A Depiction of Trials of Strength Between China and the United States)(Beijing: Zhongguo renshi chubanshe, 1996).]Google Scholar
48. “Successes amid challenges: an interview with Chen Feng, editor of the book A Depiction of the Trials of Strength Between China and U.S.” Dangdai guoji guanxi (Contemporary International Relations),Vol. 6, No. 8 (1996), p. 13.]Google Scholar
49. In addition to the two bestsellers, several other less publicized books are also written by young intellectuals and share similar themes. Among them are Yonghong, Honget at, Zhong Meijunshi chongtu qianqian houhou (U.S.-China Military Confrontations: Before and After)(Beijing: Zhongguo shehui chubanshe, 1996)]Google Scholar; Laiwang, Xi et al., Dayang ji fang: liangge shijie da guo de boyi guize (The Oceanic Wing: The Games of Two World Class Nations)(Beijing: Zhongguo shehui chubanshe, 1996, 2 vols.)]Google Scholar; Shan, Zhang and Weizhong, Xiao, Ezhi Tai du: bu chengnuo fangqi wuli (Stop Taiwan from Independence: No Promise on Not Using Force)(Beijing: Zhongguo shehui chubanshe, 1996).]Google Scholar
50. Gongqin, Xiao, “Zhongguo minzuzhuyi de lishi yu qianjing,” p. 62.]Google Scholar
51. See, for example, Cui Zhiyuan, “Zhongguo shijian di xin gudian zhengzhi jingjixue de tiaozhan” (“The challenge of Chinese practice to the neo-classical political economy”), Xianggang shehui kexue,special issue, July 1995, p. 33; Wang Xiaoqiang, “Mozhe shitou guohe” (“Groping for stones to cross the river”), Xianggang shehui kexue,special issue, July 1995, pp. 34–123; Lin Yifu, Cai Fang and Li Zhou, “Re-examination of the strategy for catching up with and surpassing advanced world levels,” Strategy and Management(English ed.), No. 2 (1995), pp. 26–44;]Google Scholar and Zhaohong, Luo, “Dongya qiji bingbu xuhuang” (“The East Asian miracle isn′t false”), Gaige (Reform), No. 3 (1995), pp. 5–6.]Google Scholar
52. Wentao, Yu, “TV series tells about Beijingers in New York,” China Daily,13 October 1993, p. 4.]Google Scholar
53. Ning, Qian, Liuxue Meiguo (Study in the United States)(Nanjing: Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe, 1996). Many of my friends recommended this book to me when I visited China in December 1996.]Google Scholar
54. Ibid.p. 247.
55. Pye, Lucian W., “How China′s nationalism was Shanghaied,” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs,No. 29 (January 1993), p. 113.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Shengzhi, Li, “Quanqiuhua yu Zhongguo wenhua” (“Globalization and Chinese culture”), Taipingyang xuebao,No. 2 (1994), pp. 3–11.]Google Scholar
57. Liping, Sun, “Shenme shi wenming′ de yanjiu luoji yu tiaolun yujing” (“The logic and language of ‘What is civilization’”), ZhanlUe yu guanli, No. 2 (1996), pp. 87–93.]Google Scholar
58. Youyu, Xue, “Shi jingjixue tiaozhan lishi, haishi luoji daiti jingyan shishi” (“Is economics a challenge to history or logic a replacement of empirical facts”), ZhanlUe yu guanli,No. 2 (1996), pp. 94–97.]Google Scholar
59. Zhong, Shi, “Wenming bijiao zhi lun shi yizhong cankao” (“Comparison of civilization is only a reference”), ZhanlUe yu guanli.No. 2 (1996), pp. 98–100.]Google Scholar
60. Daqiang, Li, “Shuangxiang wenhua zhiminhua” (“Bi-directional cultural colonization”), Dushu,No. 4 (1996), p. 155.]Google Scholar
61. Ibid.p. 156.