Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
In their effect on marriage and the family, as in so many other domains, the reforms can be seen as having a dual thrust. On the one hand, by giving the land in long-term leases back to the family, and allowing it to invest in a variety of small and medium-sized ventures, they have restored something like the situation in rural China before the collectivization of 1956, when the family estate was the source of income and investment in opportunity for most rural Chinese. On the other hand, the reforms have been undertaken explicitly in the name of modernization, and the increases in both agricultural and rural industrial yields, along with the rise in household entrepreneurship, have taken China in some ways even further from the feudalism of pre-revolutionary days than it was during the collective era.
1. Siu, Helen F., Agents and Victims in South China: Accomplices in Rural Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Greenhalgh, Susan, “The peasantization of population policy in rural Shaanxi,” in Davis, Deborah and Harrell, Stevan (eds.), Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
3. Selden, Mark, “Familial strategies and structures in rural north China,”Google Scholar in Davis, and Harrell, , Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era, Table 5.Google Scholar
4. Greenhalgh, , “Peasantization.”Google Scholar
5. Shu-min, Huang, “Changing marital strategies in a north China village,” paper presented at the Conference on Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era, Roche Harbor, Washington, 06 1990, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
6. Chan, Anita, Madsen, Richard and Unger, Jonathan, Chen Village: The Recent History of a Peasant Community in Mao's China (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984), pp. 188–191Google Scholar; Potter, Sulamith Heins and Potter, Jack M., China's Peasants: The Anthropology of a Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Selden, , “Familial strategies.”Google Scholar
7. Selden, , “Familial strategies.”Google Scholar
8. Shu-min, Huang, “Changing marital strategies,” pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
9. Potter, and Potter, , China's Peasants, pp. 200–205.Google Scholar
10. Wolf, Margery, Revolution Postponed: Women in Contemporary China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985), p. 197.Google Scholar
11. Pasternak, Burton, “On the causes and consequences of uxorilocal marriage,” in Hanley, Susan B. and Wolf, Arthur P. (eds.), Family and Population in East Asian History (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
12. Selden, , “Familial strategies.”Google Scholar
13. Goody, Jack, “Bridewealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia,” in Jack Goody and Stanley J. Tambiah, Bridewealth and Dowry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Parish, William L. and Whyte, Martin King, Village and Family in Contemporary China (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977), pp. 180–192Google Scholar; Harrell, Stevan and Dickey, Sara A., “Dowry systems in complex societies,” Ethnology, Vol. 24, No. 2 (1985), pp. 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Siu, Helen F., “Reconstituting dowry and brideprice in south China,”Google Scholar in Davis, and Harrell, , Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era.Google Scholar
15. The project was jointly sponsored and carried out by the Sichuan University Museum and the Sociology Research Group of Sichuan University; the Office of Artifact Management of the Cultural Bureau of the People's Government of Panzhihua City; and the Anthropology Department of the University of Washington. Other researchers who participated in the interviewing were Ren Hai of the Sichuan University Museum, Liu Xin and Lan Mingchun of the Sociology Group, and Li Mingxi and Wang Chengxiao of the Office of Artifact Management. Questionnaires covering the history of family composition since 1949, as well as details of the family economy from 1985–87, were given to 290 families in four communities, including 80 families in Renhe, 60 in Zhuangshang and 98 in Yishala. For other aspects of family organization in these villages, see Harrell, Stevan, “Geography, demography, and family composition in three southwestern villages,”Google Scholar in Davis, and Harrell, , Chinese Families in the 1980s.Google Scholar
16. See Harrell, Stevan, “Ethnicity, local interests, and the state: Yi communities in southwest China,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 32, No. 3 (07 1990), pp. 515–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Parish, and Whyte, , Village and FamilyGoogle Scholar; Chan, , Madsen, and Unger, , Chen VillageGoogle Scholar; Johnson, Graham E., “Family strategies and economic transformation in rural China: some evidence from the Pearl River Delta region,”Google Scholar in Davis, and Harrell, , Chinese Families in the Post-Mao PeriodGoogle Scholar; Siu, , “Reconstituting dowry and brideprice”Google Scholar; Potter and Potter, China's Peasants.
18. Selden, , “Familial strategies”Google Scholar; Shu-min, Huang, “Changing marital strategies”Google Scholar; Cohen, Myron L., “Lineage organization in north China,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 48, No. 3 (1990), pp. 509–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Harrell, , “Geography, demography, and family composition.”Google Scholar