Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:16:27.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quarterly Chronicle and Documentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Quarterly Chronicle and Documentation
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See “Quarterly Chronicle and Documentation” in issue seven.

2 See various reports quoted in the B.B.C.'s Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) Part 3, FE/W159, 162, 165.Google Scholar

3 SWB, Part 3, FE/W167/B/3.

4 SWB, Part 3, FE/W159/B/1.

5 SWB, Part 3, FE/W162/B/1–2.

6 SWB, Part 3, FE/W164/B/4–5.

7 Ibid. B/6.

8 SWB, Part 3, FE/W168/B/4.

9 SWB, Part 3, FE/W158/B/4–5.

10 SWB, Part 3, FE/W168/B/3.

11 SWB, Part 3, FE/W164/B/6.

12 SWB, Part 3, FE/W168/B/5.

13 SWB, Part 3, FE/W162/B/2–3.

14 SWB, Part 3, FE/W159/B/4.

15 SWB, Part 3, FE/968/A1/1.

16 SWB, Part 3, FE/W159/A/10–11.

17 Peking Review, No. 23, 1962.Google Scholar

18 SWB, Part 3, FE/W159/A/1–7.

19 SWB, Part 3, FE/W168/A/1, 7.

20 Commemorative ceremonies described and editorial translated in Peking Review, Nos. 21, 22.

21 According to a French correspondent in Peking, officials there denied knowledge of the event. (Agence France Presse, 06 10.)Google Scholar

22 The Indian magazine Link, which has good Communist sources, said (June 17) that this was the first meeting to which China “was not invited.”

23 SWB, Part 3, FE/922/A2/1.

24 Translated in Peking Review, No. 26, 1962.Google Scholar

25 Translated in Peking Review, No. 18, 1962.Google Scholar

26 The flare-up of the Sino-Indian border problem will be discussed in an article in our next issue.

27 Peking Review, No. 23, 1962.Google Scholar