Article contents
The Political Use of Lu Xun
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Extract
As dynasties have traditionally used historical figures for their own political purposes, so too has the Chinese Communist Party used famous figures for its political purposes. Perhaps, more than any other person in the 20th century, the Party has used the prestige of China's pre-eminent modern writer Lu Xun for a wide variety of political, ideological, and factional purposes. Since his death in October 1936, his life and work have been interpreted in different periods to conform to the latest mutation in party policy. And when the Party became factionalized after the Great Leap Forward, different political factions used Lu Xun to represent their conflicting political positions.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The China Quarterly 1982
References
1. Zedong, Mao, “On new democracy,” Selected Works of Mao Zedong (Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1965), II: 372.Google Scholar
2. Zedong, Mao, “Yanan forum on literature and art,” Selected Works of Mao Zedong (Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1965), III: 92.Google Scholar
3. Ibid.
4. Guangping, Xu, “Zhou Yang is not allowed to attack and disparage Lu Xun,” Hongqi, No. 12 (1966)Google Scholar; SCMM, No. 544, p. 6.
5. Wenyuan, Yao, “Commemorate Lu Xun and carry the revolution through to the end,” Beijing Review, 4 11 1966, p. 13.Google Scholar
6. Ming, Yuan and Ruoying, Yuan, “A secret arrow of Zhou Yang's that transposes history,” quote from Lu Xun's correspondence, Hongqi, Vol. II, 1 07 1966Google Scholar, in SCMM, No. 533, pp. 12–13.
7. Fan, Li, “Develop Lu Xun's thoroughgoing revolutionary spirit on the cultural front,” Renmin Ribao, 23 10 1966Google Scholar; SCMP, No. 3813, p. 17.
8. Xu, Yao, “Pull down the black flag of Zhou Yang's capitulationist line of literature and art of the 1930s,” NCNA, 23 08 1966Google Scholar; SCMP, No. 3711, p. 2.
9. Hongqi editorial, “In memory of Lu Xun, our forerunner in the Cultural Revolution,” Hongqi, No. 14 (1966), in SCMM, No. 550, p. 4.
10. Ibid. p. 6.
11. Ibid.
12. Jianren, Zhou, “Learn from Lu Xun; repudiate revisionism,” Chinese Literature, No. 6 (1971), p. 85.Google Scholar
13. “Renegade Qu Qiubai,” Denounce Qu Combat Bulletin, 6 05 1967Google Scholar, in SCMPS No. 238, p. 34.
14. “Minutes of forum on literature and art in the armed forces convened by Jiang Qing,” 2–20 02 1966Google Scholar; SCMP, No. 3956, p. 10.
15. Wen Yibao (Literary Gazette), No. 10 (1962), p. 42.Google Scholar
16. Xun, Lu, “Geming shidai di wenxue” (“Literature of a revolutionary period”), Lu Xun quanji (Complete Works of Lu Xun) (Beijing, 1963), 111:313.Google Scholar
17. Siding, Luo, “Learn the thoroughgoing revolutionary spirit with which Lu Xun criticized the Confucius shop,” Renmin Ribao, 25 09 1971Google Scholar; FBIS, 29 September 1971, p. B2.
18. Ibid. p. B6.
19. Xiao, Liang, “Lu Xun has effectively criticized Water Margin – a study of ‘The Evolution of Rascals,’” Guangming Ribao, 30 08 1975, p. 2.Google Scholar
20. Qishan, Zheng, “About the offer of a plan by Hou Meng,” Guangming Ribao, 28 11 1975Google Scholar; SPRCP, No. 5999, p. 161.
21. Yanliang, Fang, “Let all people know the capitulationists – Study Lu Xun's commentary on Water Margin,” Hongqi, No. 9 (1975)Google Scholar; FBIS, 4 09 1975, p. E6.Google Scholar
22. Wakeman, Frederic, “Historiography in China,” The China Quarterly, No. 76 (12 1978), p. 899.Google Scholar
23. Xing, Hu, “Can we do away with electric lights and trains?” Renmin Ribao, 3 07 1977Google Scholar; SPRCP, No. 6382, p. 7.
24. Yang, Zhou, “Inherit and carry forward the revolutionary tradition of the Left-wing cultural movement,” Renmin Ribao, 2 04 1980, p. 5.Google Scholar
25. Ibid.
26. Qiaomu, Hu, “Let us join hands, sing heartily, inspire people to build a new socialist life,” Renmin Ribao, 7 04 1980Google Scholar, FBIS, 8 04 1980, p. L4.Google Scholar
27. Renmin Ribao, 17 10 1979, p. 6.Google Scholar
28. Qiaomu, Hu, FBIS, 8 04 1980, p. L4.Google Scholar
29. Fengqi, Guo, Bojing, Fang and Hongbing, Fan, “Literary and art works cannot be separated from politics,” Tianjin Xingang, 03 1980, pp. 79–83, 91.Google ScholarJPRS, No. 77074, p. 34.
30. Ibid., p. 36.
31. Shuangbi, Su, “Criticize Yao Wenyuan's ‘Comments on the three-family village,’” Hongqi, 2 02 1979, pp. 41–48Google Scholar; JPRS, No. 073304, p. 87.
- 11
- Cited by