Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Studies on China's birth planning programmes have elicited certain variations and themes of the First Campaign (1954–57) and the Second Campaign (1962–65). Birth planning activities have rarely been reported during the Great Leap Forward (1958–60) and the Cultural Revolution (1966–69). From my earlier analysis of China's health and population policy it is evident that both the First and the Second Campaigns coincided with the bureaucratic ascendance of the Ministry of Public Health and the dominance of the professional model of health system. However, inadequate organization and co-ordination was evidenced by the lack of one single central agency, either as a supra-agency above the Ministry of Public Health or as a bureau agency under the ministry for birth planning work. In addition, the rationale for birth planning, especially during the Second Campaign, was for maternal and child health alone. Thus, the impact of both campaigns, in demographic terms, was limited.
1. Aird, J. S., “Population policy and demographic prospects in the People's Republic of China,” in People's Republic of China: An Economic Assessment (U.S. Congress) (Bethesda, Md: NIH, 1972)Google Scholar; Chen, P. C., Population and Health Policy in The People's Republic of China (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 12 1976)Google Scholar; Maru, R. M., “Population policy formulation and implementation in India and the People's Republic of China,” in The Organization of Family Planning Programs: India, China, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Lebanon (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 12 1976) (Occasional Monograph Series, No. 8)Google Scholar; Orleans, L. A., Every Fifth Child: The Population of China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1972)Google Scholar; and China's Experience in Population Control: The Elusive Model (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1974), p. 45Google Scholar.
2. K. C. Lyle, “China's health system: determinants,” American Journal of Chinese Medicine (in press).
3. All the data for this paper were supplied by the Tianjin Staff Office for Planned Birth and the Health Department, except for the abortion data which were tabulated by the author herself from the records in Tianjin Hospital No. 1 and Tianjin Hospital No. 2.
4. Ten Great Years: Statistics of the Economic and Cultural Achievements of the People's Republic of China (People's Republic of China: State Statistical Bureau) (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1960)Google Scholar.
5. Li, F., “Tientsin: from imperialist beachhead to socialist port and industrial city,” China Reconstructs, 24 (12), 54, 10 1975Google Scholar.
6. Hua, Guofeng, Report of the Governmental Work to the First Meeting of the Fifth National People 's Congress, 26/2/78 (Tianjin: People's Publishing, 03 1978), p. 30Google Scholar.
8. Tianjin IUD Collaborative Trial. 3442 Cases of 0–5 Stainless Steel Double Ring: Clinical Trial Results, 12 1977, p. 3.
9. United Nations: Population Division, Population by Sex and Age for Regions and Countries, 1950–2000, as assessed in 1973: Medium Variant (New York, United Nations, 1976), p. 9Google Scholar.
10. For footnote, see p. 561.
11. There were 110,237 births reported by the Public Security Office which is responsible for birth and death registration. The mid-year population was 7,156,212 which would yield a CBR of 154 per 1,000. The discrepancy of 2,002 births unaccounted for by the Office for Planned Birth may be due to the fact that the Public Security Office also registers illegal residents who reside in Tianjin without permits and/or illegitimate births unaccounted for by local planned birth workers in upward-reporting. It should be noted that in a hospital survey, the probability of illegitimacy was 0–00361445. Therefore, the 110,237 births may yield a total of 398 illegitimate births for 1978.
12. Wright, N. H., “Some estimates of the potential reduction in the U.S. infant mortality rate by family planning,” American Journal of Public Health, 62: 1130, 1972Google Scholar.
13. McDermott, W., “Modern Medicine and the demographic disease pattern of overly traditional societies: a technological misfit,” Journal of Medical Education, 41 (suppl.): 137, 1966Google Scholar.
14. Dubos, R., Savage, D., Schaedler, R., “Biological Freudianism: lasting effect of early environmental influences,” Pediatrics, 38: 789, 1966Google Scholar.
15. Levy, B. S., Wilkinson, F. S., Marine, W. M., “Reducing neonatal mortality rate with midwives,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109: 50, 1971CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
16. Pakter, J., O'Hare, D., “Two years experience in New York City with the abortion law: progress and problems,” American Journal of Public Health, 63: 524, 1973CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.