Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:24:04.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernization and Chinese Culture in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Wong Siu-lun
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hong Kong, by now, is quite modern. At the same time, it remains essentially Chinese. Measured by most accepted indicators, Hong Kong qualifies as a newly industrialized region. It is using so much inanimate power to drive machines that the increase in fuel consumption is no longer proportionate to the increase in population size. It has joined the ranks of the “ecological phase 4 societies” in which the livelihood of the inhabitants is dependent on “extrasomatic energy”. As it began its transition in the pattern of energy usage much later, Hong Kong is still well behind western industrial nations in per capita energy consumption. But in Asia, in 1981, it had the third highest per capita use of commercial energy after Japan and Singapore, which stood at 1,487 kilograms of coal equivalent. Between 1960 and 1979 its average annual growth rate in energy consumption was about 10 per cent, a rate higher than those of all the industrial economies and most Asian countries except Singapore and the Republic of Korea. Hong Kong's productivity is high, ranking third in Asia after Japan and Singapore with a Gross National Product (GNP) per capita that grew at the annual rate of 6 8 per cent. By 1980 its GNP per capita reached US$4,240.5 In terms of employment, in 1981, 49 per cent of its labour force was engaged in manufacturing and construction, 47 per cent in commerce and various lines of services, and just 2 per cent in agriculture. The inhabitants of Hong Kong are keen participants in the mass media.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 106 , June 1986 , pp. 306 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. An earlier version of this essay was presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of The Amerian Association for Chinese Studies held at Goleta, California between 4 and 6 November 1983.

2. Boyden, Stephen et al. , The Ecology of a City and its People: The Case of Hong Kong (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1981), p. 123Google Scholar.

3. United Nations, 1981 Statistical Yearbook (New York: United Nations, 1983), pp. 740–55Google Scholar.

4. World Bank, World Development Report, 1982 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 123Google Scholar.

5. Ibid. p. 111.

6. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1981 Census Main Report, Vol. 1: Analysis (Hong Kong: The Government Printer, 1983), p. 33Google Scholar.

7. UNESCO, Statistical Yearbook, 1984 (Paris: UNESCO, 1984), pp. VI–14, VI–22, VII–187, IX–26Google Scholar.

8. Census and Statistics Department, 1981 Census, pp. 18–24Google Scholar.

9. Ibid. p. 122.

10. Millar, Sheelagh, The Biosocial Survey in Hong Kong (Canberra: Austalian National University, Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies, 1979), p. 150Google Scholar.

11. Siu-kai, Lau, Society and Politics in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1982), p. 74Google Scholar. See also Turner, H. A. et al. The Last Colony: But Whose? A Study of the Labour Movement, Labour Market and Labour Relations in Hong Kong (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 156Google Scholar ; and Moore, Robert L., “Modernization and westernization in Hong Kong: patterns of cultural change in an urban setting” (University of California, Ph.D. thesis, 1981), p. 237Google Scholar.

12. Turner, et al. , The Last Colony, pp. 176, 197Google Scholar; Moore, “Modernization and westernization,” p. 238Google Scholar; Agassi, Joseph and Jarvie, Ian C., “A study in westernization,” in Jarvie, Ian C. and Agassi, Joseph (eds.), Hong Kong: A Society in Transition (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969), pp. 129–63Google Scholar.

13. Kahn, Herman, World Economic Development: 1979 and Beyond (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1979), pp. 121–23Google Scholar; and MacFarquhar, R., “The post-Confucian challenge,” Economist (London), 9 02 1980, pp. 67–72Google Scholar.

14. This observation was made by ProfessorKwok, Daniel W. Y. in his seminar on “Confucianism and Modernization” at the Royal Asiatic Society, Hong Kong Branch, in 1983Google Scholar.

15. Weber, Max, The Religion of China, Confucianism and Taoism (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1951), pp. 229, 232Google Scholar.

16. Ibid. p. 248.

17. MacFarquhar, , “The post-Confucian challenge,” p. 71Google Scholar.

18. Mote, Frederick W., Intellectual Foundations of China (New York: Knopf, 1971), pp. 17–20Google Scholar.

19. Hsu, Francis L. K., Americans and Chinese: Two Wavs of Life (New York: Abelard-Schuman, 1953), p. 237Google Scholar.

20. Topley, Marjorie, “Some basic conceptions and their traditional relationship to society,” in Topley, Marjorie (ed.), Some Traditional Chinese Ideas and Conceptions in Hong Kong Social Life Today (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1966), p. 19Google Scholar.

21. Millar, , Biosocial Survey, p. 405Google Scholar.

22. Oksenberg, Michel, “Management practices in the Hong Kong cotton spinning and weaving industry.” Paper read at the seminar on Modern East Asia on 15 11 1972, Columbia University, p. 5Google Scholar.

23. Siu-lun, Wong, “Industrial entrepreneurship and ethnicity: a study of the Shanghainese cotton spinners in Hong Kong” (University of Oxford, D.Phil, thesis, 1979), p. 155Google Scholar.

24. Pearse, A. S., Japan's Cotton Industry (Cyprus: Kyrenia, 1955), pp. 122–23Google Scholar.

25. Kahn, , World Economic Development, p. 122Google Scholar.

26. McClelland, David C., “Motivational patterns in Southeast Asia with special reference to the Chinese case,” Journal of Social Issues, No. 19 (1963), pp. 11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. Mitchell, Robert E., Pupil, Parent and School: A Hong Kong Study (Taipei: The Orient Cultural Service, 1972), pp. 192–205Google Scholar.

28. See Sharma, S. V. S. et al. Small Entrepreneurial Development in Some Asian Countries (New Delhi: Light and Life Publications, 1979)Google Scholar , and Sit, Victor F. S., Siu-lun, Wong and Tsin-sing, Kiang, Small-scale Industry in a Laissez-faire Economy: A Hong Kong Case Study (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University, Centre of Asian Studies, 1979)Google Scholar.

29. King, Ambrose Y. C. and Leung, D. H. K., “The Chinese touch in small industrial organizations” (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Social Research Centre, Occasional Paper, 1975), p. 34Google Scholar. See also Young, John A., ”Interpersonal networks and economic behaviour in a Chinese market town” (Stanford University, Ph.D. thesis, 1971), pp. 195–199Google Scholar.

30. Siu-lun, Wong, “Industrial entrepreneurship,” pp. 206–210Google Scholar.

31. Munro, Donald J., The Conception of Man in Early China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969), pp. 1–22Google Scholar.

32. Tung-tsu, Chu, “Chinese class structure and its ideology,” in Fairbank, John K. (ed.) Chinese Thought and Institutions (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1957), pp. 235–50Google Scholar ; Ho, Ping-ti, The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368–1911 (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1962), pp. 1–91Google Scholar.

33. Kahn, , World Economic Development, p. 121Google Scholar.

34. H. A. Turner et al. cast doubt on the pervasiveness of such an ambition among the industrial employees in Hong Kong. In their survey of 1,000 employees, it was found that less than a third (31%) of the respondents had seriously considered starting a business within the next five years, which they considered to be a “surprisingly low figure,” The Last Colony, p. 196. But at least three points should be taken into account in interpreting this piece of finding. First, administrative, executive and managerial workers were not included in the sample (p. 179). Secondly, the question was apparently directed toward the respondents' realistic appraisal of their opportunities within a definite time frame of five years which might not be the same as their unfettered aspirations. Thirdly, whether 31% was a low figure is a comparative question.

35. Siu-lun, Wong, “Industrial entrepreneurship,” p. 205Google Scholar. Kahn also points to this phenomenon but attributes it to different forms of family loyalty. See World Economic Development, p. 381.

36. Siu-Kai, Lau, “Chinese familism in an urban-industrial setting: the case of Hong Kong,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 43, No. 4 (1981), pp. 181–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar ;Millar, , Biosocial Survey, pp. 148–53Google Scholar.

37. Silin, Robert H., Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-scale Taiwanese Enterprises (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976), p. 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38. Sik-nin, Chau, “Family management in Hong Kong,” Hong Kong Manager, Vol. 6, No. 2 (1970), p. 21Google Scholar.

39. Gang, Zhao and Zhongyi, Chen, Zhongguo minye shi (A History of the Chinese Textile Industry) (Taibei: Lianji chuban shiye gongxi, 1977), p. 353Google Scholar ; Levy, Marion J. Jr, The Family Revolution in Modern China (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949), p. 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Levy, Marion J. Jr, “Business development in China,” in Levy, M. J. Jr and Shih, K. H., The Rise of the Modern Chinese Business Class (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1949), p. 12Google Scholar.

40. Sit, Victor F. S., Siu-lun, Wong and Tsin-Sing, Kiang, Small-scale Industry, p. 353Google Scholar ; see also Epsy, John L., “The strategy of Chinese industrial enterprise in Hong Kong” (Harvard University, D.B.A. thesis, 1970), p. 174Google Scholar and Ward, Barbara E., “A small factory in Hong Kong: some aspects of its internal organization,” in Willmott, William E. (ed.), Economic Organization in Chinese Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1972), p. 364Google Scholar.

41. Siu-lun, Wong, “Industrial entrepreneurship,” pp. 275–76Google Scholar.

42. Epsy, , “Chinese industrial enterprise,” p. 175Google Scholar ; Sit, Victor F. S., Siu-lun, Wong and Tsin-sing, Kiang, Small-scale Industry, pp. 353–54Google Scholar.

43. Freedman, Maurice, “The family in China, past and present,” in Skinner, G. W. (ed.), The Study of Chinese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979), p. 243Google Scholar.

44. King, Ambrose Y. C. and Man, Peter J. L., “The role of the small factory in economic development: the case of Hong Kong” (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Social Research Centre, Occasional Paper, 1974), pp. 41–42Google Scholar ; Siu-kai, Lau, “Employment relations in Hong Kong: traditional or modern?” in Liu, T., Lee, R. P. L. and Simons, V. (eds.), Hong Kong: Economics, Social and Political Studies in Development (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1979), pp. 71–72Google Scholar.

45. Epsy, , “Chinese industrial enterprise,” p. 174Google Scholar.

46. Sit, Victor F. S.. Wong Siu-lun and Kiang Tsin-sing, Small-scale Industry, p. 355Google Scholar.

47. Ibid. p. 337; Siu-lun, Wong, “Industrial entrepreneurship,” p. 287Google Scholar.

48. Landes, David S., “French business and the businessman: a social and cultural analysis.” in Aitkin, H. G. J. (ed.). Explorations in Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 185–87Google Scholar.

49. Stammer, Donald W., “Money and finance in Hong Kong” (Australian National University, Canberra, Ph.D. thesis, 1968), pp. 261–62Google Scholar ; Graham, P. A., “Financing Hong Kong business,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 17 04 1969, p. 152Google Scholar.

50. For a more extended analysis, see Siu-lun, Wong, “The Chinese family firm: a model,” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. XXXVI (1985), pp. 58–72Google Scholar.

51. H, Dwight, Perkins, (ed.), China's Modern Economy in Historical Perspective (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1975), p. 15Google Scholar.

52. Shiga, S., “Family property and the law of inheritance in traditional China,” in Baxbaum, David C. (ed.), Chinese Family Law and Social Change (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1978), pp. 128–33Google Scholar.

53. Wolf, Margery, “Child training and the Chinese family,” in Freedman, Maurice (ed.), Family and Kinship in Chinese Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), p. 53Google Scholar.

54. Freedman, Ronald and Chan, K. C., “Hong Kong's fertility decline 1961–68,” Population Index, Vol. 36, No. 1 (1970), pp. 3n18CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Ng, Pedro P. T., “Social factors contributing to fertility decline,” in King, A.Y.C. and Lee, R. P. L. (eds.), Social Life and Development in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong. 1981), pp. 235–54Google Scholar; Mok, Benjamin, “Recent fertility trends in Hong Kong.” in Cho, L. and Kobayashi, K. (eds.). Fertility Transition of the East Asian Populations (Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 1979), pp. 178–97Google Scholar.

55. Mok, Benjamin. “Recent fertility trends,” pp. 190–94:Google Scholar Pedro Ng. “Fertility decline”.

56. Ng, Pedro, “Fertility decline,” p. 183Google Scholar.

57. Mok, Benjamin, “Recent fertility trends,” p. 183Google Scholar.

58. Freedman, Ronald, “Overview,” in Cho, and Kobayashi, (eds.), Fertility Transition, p. 292Google Scholar.

59. MacFarquhar, , “The post-Confucian challenge,” p. 70Google Scholar.

60. Siu-kai, Lau, “Utilitarian familism: the basis of political stability in Hong Kong” (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Social Research Centre, Occasional Paper, 1978)Google Scholar.

61. Freedman, Maurice, “The handling of money: a note on the background to the economic sophistication of the overseas Chinese,” Man, No. 59, pp. 64–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Topley, Marjorie, “The role of savings and wealth among Hong Kong Chinese,” in Jarvie, and Agassi, (eds.), Hong Kong: A Society in Transition, pp. 167–227Google Scholar.

62. Caldwell, John, Theory of Fertility Decline (London: Academic Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

63. Bellah, Robert N., “Reflections on the Protestant ethic analogy in Asia,” in Eisenstadt, S. N. (ed.), The Protestant Ethic and Modernization: A Comparative View (New York and London: Basic Books, 1968), p. 244Google Scholar.

64. Hambro, Edward I., The Problem of Chinese Refugees in Hong Kong (Leyden: Sijthoff, 1955), p. 148Google Scholar.

65. Podmore, David, “The population of Hong Kong,” in Hopkins, Keith (ed.), Hong Kong: The Industrial Colony (London: Oxford University Press, 1971), pp. 24–25Google Scholar ; Taeuber, Irene B., “Hong Kong: migrants and metropolis,” Population Index, Vol. 29, No. 1 (1963), p. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66. Hambro, , Problem of Chinese Refugees, pp. 168–70Google Scholar.

67. Grantham, Alexander, Via Port: From Hong Kong to Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1965), p. 155Google Scholar.

68. Siu-lun, Wong, “The migration of Shanghainese entrepreneurs to Hong Kong,” in Faure, David, Hayes, James and Birch, Alan (eds.), From Village to City: Studies in the Traditional Roots of Hong Kong Society (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Centre of Asian Studies, 1984), pp. 206–227Google Scholar.

69. Hong Kong Government, Commerce and Industry Department, “Memorandum for the Trade and Industry Advisory Board: land for industry” (Hong Kong: Commerce and Industry Department, mimeographed paper, 1973), p. 2Google Scholar. Emphasis in the original.

70. Wong Siu-lin, “Industrial enterpreneurship,” p. 117.

71. Epsy, , “Chinese industrial enterprise,” p. 137Google Scholar.

72. King, Ambrose, “Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: emphasis on the grass roots level,” in King, A. Y. C. and Lee, R. P. L. (eds.), Social Life and Development in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1981), pp. 127–46Google Scholar.

73. Chun-hsi, Wu, Dollar, Dependents, and Dogma: Overseas Chinese Remittances to Communist China (California: Hoover Institute, 1967), p. 6Google Scholar.

74. Wu Chun-hsi, ibid. p. 88; Heidhues, Mary F. S., Southeast Asia's Chinese Minorities (Australia: Longmans, 1974), p. 20Google Scholar.

75. Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds.), From Max Weber (London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948), p. 416Google Scholar.

76. Levy, Marion J. Jr, “Constrasting factors in the modernization of China and Japan,” in Kuznets, S., Moore, W. E., and Spengler, J. J. (eds.), Economic Growth in Brazil, India, Japan (Durham: Duke University Press, 1955), pp. 496–536Google Scholar.

77. Sit, Victor F. S., Siu-lun, Wong and Tsin-sing, Kiang, Small-scale Industry, pp. 288–92Google Scholar.

78. Skinner, William G.. Leadership and Power in the Chinese Community of Thailand (New York: Cornell University Press, 1958), p. 83Google Scholar, Siu-lun, Wong, “The economic enterprise of the Chinese in Southeast Asia: a sociological inquiry with special reference to West Malaysia and Singapore” (University of Oxford, B.Litt. thesis, 1975), pp. 110–15Google Scholar.

79. Topley, , “The role of savings,” p. 187Google Scholar.

80. Moore, , “Modernization and westernization,” p. 66Google Scholar.

81. Rozman, Gilbert (ed.), The Modernization of China (New York: The Free Press, 1981), pp. 158–60Google Scholar.

82. Mote, Frederick W., “The city in traditional Chinese civilization,” in Liu, James T. C. and Tu, Wei-ming (eds.). Traditional China (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970), pp. 42–49Google Scholar.

83. Murphy, Rhoads, The Treaty Ports and China's Modernization: What Went Wrong? (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Chinese Studies, 1970)Google Scholar.

84. Donnithorne, Audrey, “Hong Kong as an economic model for the great cities of China,” in Youngson, A. J. (ed.), China and Hong Kong: The Economic Nexus (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 282–310Google Scholar.

85. Levy, Marion J. Jr, Modernization: Latecomers and Survivors (New York and London: Basic Books. 1972), p. 13Google Scholar.

86. Frank, Andre Gunder, “Asia's exclusive models,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 25 06 1982, pp. 22–23Google Scholar.

87. For a more extended discussion on the issue of Chinese familism and modernization see Wong Siu-lun, “The applicability of Asian family values to other socio-cultural settings,” paper presented at the symposium on “In Search of an East Asian Development Model” sponsored jointly by Asia and World Institute and Council on Relgion and International Affairs, 28–30 June 1985, New York City.