Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:31:35.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperialism in Transition: British Business and the Chinese Authorities, 1931–37

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Jürgen Osterhammel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to current Chinese views, in 1949 China was liberated from three major evils: feudalism, imperialism and bureaucratic capitalism. The present article takes a closer look at the relationship between the two last mentioned. The period chosen is the early and mid 1930s, which was marked by growing tensions between the powers in East Asia, by acute economic depression and subsequent recovery, and by the gradual extension of the Nanjing Government's control over the country. On the foreigner's side, the focus will be on the British experience at a time when Great Britain's political position in the Far East was being overshadowed by Japan's thrust towards hegemony. It will be argued, the widening gap between Britain's political and economic presence in China was partly bridged by increasingly close co-operation between British business and the Chinese ruling elite.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 98 , June 1984 , pp. 260 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Economic Review of Foreign Countries 1937 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1938), p. 22Google Scholar.

2. Shanghai, Deutsche Handelskammer, Jahresbericht und Übersicht über die Tätigkeit des Vorstandes der Deutschen Handelskammer Shanghai für das Geschäftsjahr 1937/38 (Shanghai: Deutsche Handelskammer Shanghai, 1938), p. 6Google Scholar.

3. The Financial News (London), 30 03 1937, p. 26Google Scholar.

4. Public Record Office London (hereafter PRO), Treasury (hereafter T) 188/134 Leith-Ross, “Notes on a meeting held at the Board of Trade on 30th October, 1936.”

5. Finance and Commerce (Shanghai), 8 07 1936, p. 34Google Scholar.

6. PRO, Foreign Office (hereafter FO) 371/20965/F3975 Beale to Knatchbull-Hugessen, 6 April 1937.

7. Quoted in Sargent, A. J., Anglo-Chinese Commerce and Diplomacy (Mainly in the Nineteenth Century), (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907), p. 106Google Scholar.

8. FO 371/20218/F4498 Pratt, minute, 6 August 1936.

9. Kia-ngau, Chang, China's Struggle for Railroad Development (New York: John Day, 1943), pp. 153–72Google Scholar; Seen, Chao Yung, Les chemins de fer Chinois: étude historique, politique, économique et financière (Paris: Librairie Sociale et Economique, 1939)Google Scholar, passim; Rucheng, Mi, Diguozhuyi yu Zhongguo tielu 1847–1949 (Shanghai: Renmin chubanshe, 1980), pp. 287–90Google Scholar.

10. For a later comprehensive exposition of the meaning of “semi-colonialism ” see Yanan, Wang, Zhongguo banfengjian banzhimindi jingji xingtai yanjiu (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1957)Google Scholar.

11. On the diplomatic background see Fung, Edmund S. K., “Britain, Japan and Chinese tariff autonomy, 1927–1928,” Proceedings of the British Association for Japanese Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (1981), pp. 23–36Google Scholar.

12. Bergère, Marie-Claire, “‘The other China’: Shanghai from 1919 to 1949,” in Howe, Christopher (ed.), Shanghai: Revolution and Development in an Asian Metropolis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 16Google Scholar.

13. Pratt, John Sir, War and Politics in China (London: Jonathan Cape, 1943), p. 201Google Scholar.

14. See Louis, Wm. Roger, British Strategy in the Far East 1919–1939 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), pp. 109–70Google Scholar; Clark, Peter Gaffney, “Britain and the Chinese revolution, 1925–1927” (Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1973), pp. 325Google Scholaret seq.; Fung, Edmund S. K., “The Sino-British rapprochement, 1927–1931,” Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1 (02 1983), pp. 79–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. FO 371/12447/F4969 Dane, memo, 31 March 1927; FO 371/12448/F7389 Mead, memo, 13 July 1927. On the reorganization under Dane see Adshead, S. A. M., The Modernization of the Chinese Salt Administration, 1900–1920 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), pp. 90–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Gale, Esson M., Salt for the Dragon: A Personal History of China (East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, 1953), p. 191Google Scholar.

17. FO 371/20234/F4212 Buxton to Leith-Ross, 21 April 1936.

18. FO 371/20274/F5485 Pratt, memo, 7 September 1936.

19. FO 371/124477sol;F5269 Hussey-Freke, memo, 13 April 1927. See also Jianchang, Li, Guanliao ziben yu yanye (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1963), pp. 20–21Google Scholar.

20. Young, Arthur N., China's Nation-Building Effort, 1927–1937: The Financial and Economic Record (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1971), pp. 115–18Google Scholar.

21. Shiqi, Chen, “Lun Zhongguo jindai haiguan xingzheng de jige tedian,” Lishi yanjiu, No. 5 (1980), p. 74Google Scholar; School of Oriental and African Studies, London, Sir Frederick Maze Papers, Confidential Letters and Reports, Vol. 11, Maze to Cadogan, 23 December 1935.

22. Chinese Maritime Customs, Documents Illustrative of the Origin, Development, and Activities of the Chinese Customs Service, Vol. 5 (Shanghai: Inspectorate General of Customs, 1939), p. 332Google Scholar.

23. Ibid. p. 18. The system as it functioned between 1912 and 1929 is described in Wright, Stanley F., The Collection and Disposal of the Maritime and Native Customs Revenue since the Revolution of 1911 (Shanghai: Inspectorate General of Customs, 1925), pp. 2–22Google Scholar See also Feuerwerker, Albert, The Foreign Establishment in China in the Early Twentieth Century (Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, 1976), pp. 65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the changes effected in 1929 see FO 371/14695/F 678 Moss to Lampson, 5 November 1929.

24 .For example, Bedeski, Robert E., State-Building in Modern China: The Kuomintang in the Prewar Period (Berkeley: Center for Chinese Studies 1981), pp. 97–122Google Scholar.

25. Ibid. p. 122.

26. On the dialectics of equilibrium and destabilization see Zürcher, E., “‘Western expansion and Chinese reaction’: a theme reconsidered,” in Wesseling, H. L. (ed.), Expansion and Reaction (Leiden: Centre for the History of European Expansion, 1978), pp. 59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. For the theoretical foundations see Robinson, Ronald E., “Non-European foundations of European imperialism: sketch for a theory of collaboration,” in Owen, Roger and Sutcliffe, Bob (eds.), Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London: Longman, 1972), pp. 117–42Google Scholar; also his “Imperial theory and the question of imperialism after Empire,” in Wolfgang J. Mommsen and Jürgen Osterhammel (eds.), Imperialism and After, Continuities and Discontinuities (forthcoming).

28. Levenson, Joseph R., Confucian China and Its Modern Fate. A Trilogy, Vol. 1: The Problem of Intellectual Continuity (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1958), p. 153Google Scholar.

29. Report of the Hon. Richard Feetham, C. M. G., to the Shanghai Municipal Council, Vol. 1 (Shanghai: North China Daily News and Herald, 1931), p. 269Google Scholar.

30. Remer, C. F., Foreign Investments in China (New York: Macmillan, 1933), p. 395 (Table 13)Google Scholar.

31. Banks are not included in the following discussion.

32. In recent literature the term treaty port has been used either in its strict legal sense or to denote the clusters of foreign settlement and investment in the big coastal and riverine centres. In the present article the former meaning will be preferred.

33. Berliner, Siegfried, Organisation und Betrieb des Import-Geschäfts in China (Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung, 1920), p. 8Google Scholar.

34. Weiqi, Wang, “Tongzhi maoyi sheng zhong zhi Shanghai jinkou shanghang gaikuang diaocha,” Dongfang zazhi. Vol. 34, No. 13 (1 07 1937), p. 131Google Scholar; Chinese Maritime Customs, Decennial Reports. Fifth Issue: 1922–1931 (Shanghai: Inspectorate General of Customs, 1933), Vol 1, p. 527, Vol. 2, pp. 143, 155Google Scholar.

35. United Kingdom. Department of Overseas Trade, Trade and Economic Conditions in China 1931–1933 (London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1933), p. 28Google Scholar.

36. Fong, H. D., Cotton Industry and Trade in China, Vol. 2, (Tianjin: Nankai Institute of Economics, 1931), pp. 262–71Google Scholar; United Kingdom. Department of Overseas Trade, Rtport of the Cotton Commission (London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1931), pp. 59–90Google Scholar; Jiu Zhongguo de zibenzhuyi shengchan guanxi (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1977), pp. 281–84Google Scholar.

37. PRO, Board of Trade (hereafter BT) 60/29/1 Tientsin British Chamber of Commerce, memo “The present state of British trade in North China,” 24 12 1930Google Scholar.

38. Lie, Zhao, Zhongguo chaye wenti (Shanghai: Dadong shuju, 1931), pp. 159–60Google Scholar; Yuxin, Peng, “Kang Ri Zhanzheng qian Hankou de yanghang he mainban,” Lilun zhanxian yuekan No. 2 (1959), p. 26Google Scholar; Sabelberg, Franz, Tee. Wandlungen in der Erzeugung und Verwendung des Tees nach dem Weltkrieg (Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut, 1938), p. 128Google Scholar.

39. Calculated from data in Finance and Commerce, 19 February 1936, p. 210.

40. Torgasheff, Boris P., China as a Tea Producer (Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1926), pp. 11–12Google Scholar.

41. See Juenong, Wu/Haochuan, Hu, Zhongguo chaye fuxing jihua (Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1935), pp. 59–60Google Scholar; Juenong, Wu/Hejun, Fan, Zhongguo chaye wenti (Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1937), p. 202Google Scholar; Sanli, Tian, “Xiang cha gaijin zhi jihua,” Guowen zhoubao, Vol. 13, No. 17 (4 05 1936), p. 24Google Scholar; Gardella, Robert Paul, Fukien's tea industry and trade in Ch'ing and Republican China: the developmental consequences of a traditional commodity export (Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 1976), p. 143Google Scholar. For similar conditions in the silk trade see Li, Lillian M., China's Silk Trade: Traditional Industry in the Modern World, 1842–1937 (Cambridge, Mass, and London: Harvard University Press, 1981), pp. 154–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42. Cochran, Sherman G., Big Business in China: Sino-Foreign Rivalry in the Cigarette Industry, 1890–1930 (Cambridge, Mass, and London: Harvard University Press, 1980), p. 16Google Scholar.

43. FO 371/181277/F1670 Holman to Ingram, 24 January 1934.

44. On the early history of the Peking Syndicate see Chi-ming, Hou, Foreign Investment and Economic Development in China, 1840–1937 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965), pp. 71–73Google Scholar.

45. The third coal mine with British capital invested in it was the Mentougou Mining Co. It was of little significance as a part of the British informal empire in China. On its history up to 1949 see lishixi, Beijing shifan daxue, Mentougou meikuang shigao (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1958), pp. 1–9Google Scholar.

46. Calculated from data in the School of Oriental and African Studies (London), John Swire & Sons, Ltd., Papers (hereafter JSSP) III/2/18 John Swire & Sons to Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai), 16 April 1937.

47. JSSP III/2/18 Dean, A. V., “Memorandum on British shipping interests in the Yangtsze river trade,” 10 02 1937Google Scholar.

48. Chinese Maritime Customs, The Trade of China 1934, Vol. 1 (Shanghai: Inspectorate General of Customs, 1935), p. 23Google Scholar.

49. JSSP III/2/16 Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai) to John Swire & Sons, 13 April 1934, and numerous references in JSSP.

50. Zhu Jianbang, Yangzijiang hangye (Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1937), p. 122Google Scholar; FO 371/19282/F5826 Lamb, memo “Yangtze Shipping Pool Agreement,” 29 July 1935; Finance and Commerce, 12 June 1935, p. 662.

51. JSSP 111/2/16 John Swire & Sons to Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai), 25 May 1934.

52. On the export side, there was only one purchasing network that connected a British manufacturer/exporter to agricultural producers in the Chinese villages. It was operated, on a smaller scale than the major distribution networks, by the International Export Co., a firm specializing in the export of egg products from China. See Zhen, Chen (ed.), Zhongguo jindai gongye shi zilao, disiji (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1961), pp. 482–83Google Scholar; Weaning, Zhang, “Zhongguo danye yanjiu,” Shangye yuebao, Vol. 15, No. 5 (05 1935), p. 3Google Scholar; Chi-tung, Wang, Eggs Industry in China (Tianjin and Shanghai: Hautes études/Université de l' Aurore, 1937), pp. 21–22Google Scholar.

53. On the APC network see BT 59/1 Beale, , memo “Asiatic Petroleum Company,” 12 08 1930Google Scholar; Guanyi, Lu, “Wo guo cheyong qiyou zhi gongji qingxing,” Gongye zhongxin, Vol. 5, No. 10 (10 1936), pp. 493–97Google Scholar; Ping, Zhao, “Zhongguo shiyouye gaishu, ”Gongshang banyuekan, Vol. 7, No. 9 (1 05 1935), pp. 28–29Google Scholar. On BAT see Cochran, , Big Business in China, pp. 27–35, 130–34Google Scholar; Zengnian, Chen, “Ying-Mei yan gongsi zai Zhongguo de xiaoshou wang,” Xueshu yuekan, No. 1 (1981), pp. 16–21Google Scholar.

54. JSSP V/6/3 [Taikoo Sugar Refinery], memo “Up-country selling organization,” 30 June 1929.

55. BT 59/1 Imperial Chemical Industries (China) Ltd., “Notes prepared by Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd., for information of the mission,” 15 September 1930.

56. FO 371/181447/F4299 APC to Beale, 15 May 1934.,

57. For broad-ranging discussions see Murphey, Rhoads, The Outsiders: The Western Experience in India and China (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1977), pp. 131–96Google Scholar; Menzel, Ulrich, Theorie und Praxis des chinesischen Entwicklungsmodells: Ein Beitragzum Konzept autozentrierter Entwicklung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1978), pp. 124–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58. Chinese Maritime Customs, The Trade of China 1931, Vol. 1 (Shanghai: Inspectortrte General of Customs, 1932), p. 53Google Scholar; FO 371/20984/F2783 Hankow Intelligence Report for October 1936 to March 1937.

59. Wiens, Herold J., “Riverine and coastal junks in China's commerce,” Economic Geography, Vol. 31 (1955), pp. 254–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Murphey, , The Outsiders, pp. 114–15Google Scholar.

60. FO 371/192917/F985 Kent (BAT), memo, 20 December 1934; FO 371/20263/F583 Cadogan to Hoare, 20 December 1935; Chung-rui, Chi, “Cigarette industry in China,” Chinese Economic Journal, Vol. 16, No. 5 (05 1935), pp. 638–39Google Scholar.

61. Cochran, Big Business in China, passim.

62. Yi, Ouyang, “Huabei huaxue gongchang kaochaji,” Zhongguo jianshe. Vol. 11, No. 6 (06 1935), pp. 44–46Google Scholar; Yubing, Xu, “Zhongguo jiben huaxue gongye zhi xianzhuang,” Guowen zhoubao. Vol. 12, No. 28 (22 07 1935), p. 4Google Scholar; Zhen, Chen (ed.), Zhongguo jindai gongye shi ziliao, disiji, p. 512Google Scholar. On Yongli and other examples of successful “national capitalist” enterprises see also Rawski, Thomas G., China's Transition to Industrialism: Producer Goods and Economic Development in the Twentieth Century (Ann Arbor/Folkestone: University of Michigan Press/Dawson, 1980), pp. 6–24Google Scholar.

63. Remer, C. F., The Foreign Trade of China (Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1926), p. 234Google Scholar.

64. FO 371/19286/F114 Nixon, , memo, “Credits for China,” 1 01 1935Google Scholar.

65. For statistical data see Chinese Government Purchasing Commission, Annual Report for the Year 1937 (London: Chinese Government Purchasing Commission, 1938)Google Scholar. The diplomatic background is illuminated in Shuhuai, Wang, Gengzi peikuan (Taibei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindai shi yanjiusuo, 1974), pp. 426–81Google Scholar.

66. Osterhammel, Jürgen, “‘Technical Cooperation’ between the League of Nations and China,” Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4 (10 1979), pp. 661–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67. Trotter, Ann, Britain and East Asia 1933–1937 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 148–67Google Scholar; Endicott, Stephen Lyon, Diplomacy and Enterprise: British China Policy 1933–1937 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1975), pp. 102–149Google Scholar.

68. Imperial Chemical House, London, Imperial Chemical Industries Archives, N[icholson], J. G., memo “Yung Li Soda Company,” 14 05 1928Google Scholar.

69. JSSP II/2/5 Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai) to John Swire & Sons, 22 January 1926; Zhen, Chen (ed.), Zhongguo jindai gongye shi ziliao, dierji (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe 1958), p. 51Google Scholar.

70. For an excellent case study see Wright, Tim, “Sino-Japanese business in China: the Luda Company, 1921–1937,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 39, No. 4 (08 1980), pp. 77–27Google Scholar.

71. Bush, Richard C., Industry and politics in Kuomintang China: the Nationalist regime and lower Yangtze cotton mill owners, 1927–1937 (Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 1978), pp. 233–47, 257–64Google Scholar.

72. Chi-ming, Hou, Foreign Investment, p. 72Google Scholar.

73. Text of the agreement in FO 371/18127/F403.

74. Chi-ming, Hou, Foreign Investment, p. 75Google Scholar.

75. Gengsheng, Xu, Zkong-wai heban meitie kuangye shihua (Shanghai: Shangwu yioshuguan, 1947), pp. 23–24Google Scholar; FO 371/19302/F2968 Tientsin Intelligence Report for October 1934 to March 1935.

76. Bodleian Library, Oxford, E. J. Nathan Papers, Nathan to Turner, 22 September 1934.

77. Shenbao nianjian (Shanghai: Shenbao guan, 1936), pp. 621–31Google Scholar.

78. Royal Insurance Co., Ltd., Chief Administration. Overseas Department, letter to the author, 17 July 1979.

79. Leichun, Shen, “Wo guo zhi baoxianye,” Shiyebuyuekan, Vol. 2, No. 5 (05 1937), pp. 77–95Google Scholar; Chow, C. P., “Insurance business in China,” Central Bank of China Bulletin, Vol. 3, No. 4 (12 1937), pp. 281–87Google Scholar.

80. JSSP II/2/9 Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai) to London & Lancashire Insurance Co., Ltd., 6 June 1930.

81. JSSP II/2/10 Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai) to London & Lancashire Insurance Co., Ltd., 18 September 1931.

82. JSSP II/2/10 Mitchell, , draft memo “Proposed Chinese insurance company” (?) 05 1931Google Scholar.

83. SirSalter, Arthur, “China and the Depression,”Economist, Supplement, 19 05 1934, p. 9Google Scholar; Endicott, Stephen Lyon, “British financial diplomacy in China: the Leith-Ross mission, 1935–1937,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 4 (winter 1973/1974), p. 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84. Leary, William M. Jr, The Dragon's Wings: The China National Aviation Corporation and the Development of Commercial Aviation in China (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Wiethoff, Bodo, Luftverkehr in China 1928–1949: Materialien zu einem untauglichen Modemisierungsversuch (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1975)Google Scholar.

85. For the distinction between min and guan as an analytical concept see Chen, Joseph T., The May Fourth Movement in Shanghai (Leiden: Brill, 1971), p. 4Google Scholar.

86. British Chamber of Commerce Journal (Shanghai), Vol. 19, No. 5 (05 1934), p. 105Google Scholar.

87. The following brief remarks are restricted to Chinese labour activities as they were perceived by the British.

88. SeeClark, , “Britain and the Chinese revolution,” pp. 276–307Google Scholar.

89. Wang, Y. C., “Tu Yueh-sheng (1888–1951): a tentative political biography,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3 (05 1967), p. 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90. FO 371/13929/F891 Lampson to Chamberlain, 29 December 1928; further documents in FO 371/13232.

91. Chaojun, Ma, Zhongguo laogong yundong shi (Taibei: Zhongguo laogong fuli chubanshe, 1959), p. 1172Google Scholar; FO 371/18092/F1775 Ingram to Foreign Office, 27 March 1934; China Weekly Review (Shanghai), 24 03 1934, p. 123Google Scholar; North China Herald (Shanghai), 28 03 1934, p. 482Google Scholar.

92. FO 371/19284/F3832 Randall, minute, 13 June 1935, quoting E. J. Nathan.

93. China Weekly Review, 17 July 1935, p. 96; 6 June 1936, p. 22; 11 July 1936, p. 218.

94. For a detailed account see Clark, , “Britain and the Chinese revolution,” pp. 234–76Google Scholar.

95. FO 371/19307/F5493 Moss to Cadogan, 28 June 1935; FO 371/19305/F5495 Cadogan to Hoare, 9 July 1935; JSSP1/3/10 Donald to Fisher, 30 July 1935.

96. FO 371/18082/F3206 Tsinan Intelligence Reportfor October 1933 to March 1934.

97. FO 371/19321/F6420 Chiang Kai-shek to Zhejiang Provincial Government, 11 June 1935 (translation). On the relationship between the New Life Movement and the narcotics question see Domes, Jürgen, Vertagte Revolution. Die Politik der Kuomintang in China, 1923–1937 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1969), pp. 555–57Google Scholar.

98. JSSP III/2/16 Butterfield & Swire (Shanghai) to Butterfield & Swire (Hong Kong), 24 July 1934.

99. See Cavendish, Patrick, “Anti-imperialism in the Kuomintang, 1923–8,” in Ch'ên, Jerome and Tarling, Nicholas (eds.), Studies in the Social History of China and South-East Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), pp. 23–56Google Scholar; Yijun, Xu, “Shilun Guangzhou Wuhan shiqi guomin zhengfu de fan di waijiao celüe,” Jindai shi yanjiu, No. 3 (1982), 31–48Google Scholar.

100. During the early 1930s the Provincial Government in Guangzhou introduced policies of resistance against the foreign oil and sugar companies. See Osterhammel, Jürgen, Britischer Imperialismus im Fernen Osten: Strukturen der Durchdringung und einheimischer Widerstand auf dem chinesischen Markt 1932–1937 (Bochum: Brockmeyer, 1983), pp. 321–36Google Scholar. The following remarks are limited to the National Government.

101. FO 371/18048/F6507 Whyte, , memo “The Far East after four years,” n.d. [1934]Google Scholar.

102. T 188/162 Leith-Ross, memo, 22 February 1937.

103. JSSP I/3/10 Swire to Dawson, 16 December 1935.

104. FO 371/18101/F4469 McGowan, et al. “Report to the President of the Board of Trade,” 18 07 1934Google Scholar.

105. Tamagna, Frank M., Banking and Finance in China (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1942), p. 119Google Scholar; F[rédet, J[ean]] “Philosophie de la coopération sino-étrangère,” Bulletin commercial de l' Extrême-Orient, 1936, p. 108Google Scholar.

106. China Weekly Review, 22 September 1934, p. 141.

107. Central Bank of China Bulletin, No. 2 (09 1935), pp. lll–13Google Scholar; North China Herald, 3 July 1935, p. 17; Finance and Commerce, 15 April 1936, p. 423.

108. F., J., “Philosophie de la coopération,” p. 111Google Scholar; FO 371/19338/F8036 Howe to Hoare, 4 November 1935; T 188/127 Rogers, , memo “The Central Trust of China,” 17 03 1936Google Scholar; Seng, Gu, Kong Xiangxi yu Zhongguo caizheng (Taibei: Boxue chubanshe, 1979), pp 92–98Google Scholar.

109. Text in Guomin zhengfu gongbao, No. 1786, 6 July 1935, pp. 9–22.

110. FO 371/20997/F3530 Pratt, minute, 9 July 1937.

111. FO 371/193077sol;F4445 Gull, , “Interim Reports. IV. Shanghai,” 24 05 1935Google Scholar.

112. Text in Guomin zhengfu gongbao. No. 1417, 21 April 1934, pp. 1–2.

113. FO 371/18074/F421 Hillman to Chamber of Commerce Committee, Shanghai, 28 November 1933.

114. FO 371/20263/F4177 Cowan to Eden, 27 May 1936.

115. See Cochran, , Big Business in China, pp. 42–45, 126–29Google Scholar.

116. Zhongguo kexueyuan. Shanghai jingji yanjiusuo/Shanghai shehui kexueyuan jingji yanjiusuo, Nanyang xiongdi gongsi shiliao (Shanghai: Renmin chubanshe, 1958), p. 408Google Scholar.

117. kexueyuan, Zhongguo …, Nanyang xiongdi, p. 420Google Scholar; Han-seng, Chen, Industrial Capital and the Chinese Peasants: A Study of the Livelihood of Chinese Tobacco Cultivators (Shanghai: Kelly and Walsh, 1939), p. 41Google Scholar.

118. Wang, Y. C., “Free enterprise in China: the case of a cigarette concern, 1905–1953,” Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 29, No. 4 (11 1960), p. 404CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Xie, Zhu, Zhongguo zushui wenti (Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1936), pp. 486–502Google Scholar; Xi, Wang, “Cong Ying-Mei yan gongsi kan diguozhuyi de jingji qinlüe,” Lishi yanjiu, No. 4 (1976), pp. 80–81Google Scholar; Zhongli, Zhang, “Jiu Zhongguo waizi qiye fazhan de tedian: guanyu Ying-Mei yan gongsi ziben de jilei he chao'e lirun,” Shehui kexue, No. 6 (1980), p. 54Google Scholar.

119. FO 371/19291/F1000 Woodroffe, , “Narrative of events which have occurred in connection with the Chung Fu Joint Mining Administration between 8th May 1934 and 28th December 1934,” 29 12 1934Google Scholar; Gengsheng, Xu, Zhong-wai heban meitie kuangye shihua, pp. 145–53Google Scholar.

120. FO 371/19291/F1000 Woodroffe, , “Narrative…” (p. 36)Google Scholar.

121. FO 371/19287/F1623 Cadogan to Vansittart, 21 February 1935. See also Endicott, , Diplomacy and Enterprise, p. 42Google Scholar.

122. FO 371/19330/F6968 Mitchell, , “Minute of interview with T. V. Soong,” 14 10 1935Google Scholar; FO 371/20997/F3851 Knatchbull-Hugessen to Orde, 10 May 1937.

123. ICI Archives, Sampson, “Preliminary report on nitrogen fixation in China,” 16 11 1932Google Scholar.