No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Genetics is the science of heredity. In the Western world modern genetics has a history of nearly a hundred years, beginning with the discovery of laws of heredity established by Mendel in 1866. Then, early in the 1930s, a Soviet genetics emerged. The foremost proponent of this new science is the Soviet Academician and agriculturist Lysenko. Let me sum up briefly the differences between Western and Soviet genetics. Modern genetics has established that hereditary material is located in the chromosomes of the nucleus of reproductive cells (sperms and eggs). This material is organised into functionally separate units called “genes.” Hence, it is known as the gene theory or the chromosome theory of heredity. On the other hand, Lysenko and his followers believe that every particle of an organism plays a part in heredity; the particles assimilate the influence of environment and pass it on to the next generation. Thus, if an organism can be forced or trained to assimilate certain environmental elements, there will be hereditary changes in their offspring. Lysenko borrows the prestige of Michurin, a skilful and successful Soviet horticulturist by calling this doctrine Michurinism, while we refer to it as Lysenkoism.
1 For a full and lucid discussion of the essential issues involved in deciding the legitimacy of Soviet genetics I cannot do better than refer readers to Huxley, Julian's Soviet Genetics ana World Science (London: Chatto and Windus, 1949).Google Scholar
2 A summary of the work by Chinese Lysenkoists for the last decade may be found in Chen-Ian, Liang, “Achievements in Michurin Genetics ia China, during the Past Decade,” General Biology, No. 10, 1959.Google Scholar
3 Chung-hsi, Fong, “Some Thoughts Resulting from Attending the Genetics Conference,” General Biology, No. 10, 1956.Google Scholar
4 Published by the Chinese Science Press in 1956.
5 “On the Physical Basis of Heredity,” General Biology, No. 1, 1957.
6 Reproduced as “The Place of Genetics in Biological Science,” General Biology. No. 3, 1957.Google Scholar
7 See below, p. 151.
8 “On What Constitutes the Physical Basis of Heredity,” General Biology, No. 5, 1957.Google Scholar
9 “A Discussion of the Article ‘On What Constitutes the Physical Basis of Heredity’,” General Biology, No. 7, 1957.Google Scholar
10 “On Problems of Speciation,” Science, No. 2, 1957.Google Scholar
11 “Some Methods in Experiments of Exchanging Egg-White in Fowls,” General Biology, No. 7, 1957.Google Scholar
12 “On the Problem of Co-operation Between the New and Old Schools of Genetics,” General Biology, No. 10, 1957.Google Scholar
13 “The Problem of the Nature of the Controversy between the Two Schools of Genetics,” General Biology, No. 2, 1958.Google Scholar
14 People's Daly, 08 12, 1957.Google Scholar
15 Kiang, op. cit.
16 “A Critique of the Mutation Theory of Evolution of Modern, Darwinism,” General Biology, No. 1, 1960.Google Scholar
17 “The Historical Origin of Gene Theory and its Metaphysical Quality,” Journal of Natural Science (Wuhan Un.) No. 1–16, 1957.Google Scholar