Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:09:00.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Foreign Relations of Greater China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Michael Yahuda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Greater China refers in the first instance to the close economic ties of trade, technology transfers and investment that have emerged since the second half of the 1980s linking Taiwan and Hong Kong with the rapid development of southern China. But it also suggests that the economic links are buttressed by familial, social, historical and cultural ties of a peculiarly Chinese kind. These ties and links have developed between different Chinese communities whose political divergences had until recently precluded such a development. Consequently the emergence of Greater China poses new challenges and opportunities to the political identities of its three constituent members and to the conduct of relations between them. Greater China and its possible future trajectory affects and is also affected by the rest of the Asia-Pacific region including the major powers of the United States and Japan as well as those in the immediate vicinity of South-east Asia.

Type
Greater China
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 136 , December 1993 , pp. 687 - 710
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For an account of these see Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London: Macmillan, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar) and for an account of its spread to the rest of the world see Watson, A. and Bull, H., The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

2. See for example the seven papers in the June 1992 Report, “American Economic Relations with Greater China: Challenges for the 1990s”, by the American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C.

3. For an account of some of the proposals made by Chinese scholars in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the mainland see Kao, Charng, “A ‘Greater China economic sphere’: reality and prospects”, Issues and Studies, 11 1992, pp. 49–64Google Scholar. The article also presents several economic arguments to demonstrate difficulties in formalizing the economic relationship in other than very loose terms.

4. Interview in Beijing, 10 August 1992.

5. Interview with Hu, Jason, Director of the Government Information Office, Taipei, 1509 1992Google Scholar.

6. Vice-Director of the Taiwan Office, Sun Xiaoyu, for example, told me that on several occasions he had met senior officials from Taiwan in Hong Kong without this becoming public knowledge.

7. The figures are drawn from Baldinger, Pamela, “The birth of Greater China”, The China Business Review, 05–06 1992, pp. 13–17Google Scholar.

8. For a detailed account of the negotiations leading up to the Joint Declaration of 1984 see Cottrell, Robert, The End of Hong Kong, The Secret Diplomacy of Imperial Retreat (London: John Murray, 1993)Google Scholar.

9. The above analysis draws on the author's “Hong Kong's future: Sino-British negotiations, perceptions, organization and political culture”, International Affairs, April 1993.

10. This was made abundantly clear at the 14th Party Congress held in Beijing as Patten was making his controversial proposals in Hong Kong on 7 October 1992. No reference was made in the Report to political reform such as the possible separation of Party and government envisaged at the previous Congress. Instead the emphasis was on the necessity of preserving Party dominance during a period of rapid economic change.

11. For Qian's remarks see Xinhua, 9 July 1993 and for a more hard hitting response Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong) editorial, both in BBC, Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB), FE/1737, pp. A2/1–2.

12. Official figures cited by Baldinger, , “The birth of Greater China”, and by Angus Foster, “Bitter enemies become grudging partners”, Financial Times, 1311 1992Google Scholar.

13. See Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement of 9 July 1993 in SWB FE/1739, p. A2/4.

14. Ibid.

15. Figures drawn from Baldinger, “The birth of Greater China.”

16. The People's Daily, overseas edition, 16 November 1992. Xu Ping, “What is Chris Patten up to by meeting Hsu Sheng-fa?” SWB FE/1542, pp. A2/2–3.

17. Baldinger, , “The birth of Greater China”, p. 17Google Scholar.

18. See Wilson, Dick, Hong Kong! Hong Kong! (London: Unwin Hyman, 1990), p. 196Google Scholar.

19. The concept of state identity as used here is closely related to that of political culture on which there is a vast literature. As applied to international relations, reference may be made to Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society, pp. 57–59 for a discussion of the basis of order within a modern state. More particularly, seeGoogle ScholarAron, Raymond, Peace and War, A Theory of International Relations (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966) pp. 99–104Google Scholar, for a discussion of the implications of the international system being “heterogeneous” -i.e., when states are characterized by different and competing principles of domestic legitimacy. See also the discussion by Mayall, James, “The variety of states” in Navari, Cornelia (ed.,)The Condition of States (Milton Keynes: The Open University Press, 1991) pp. 44–60Google Scholar.

20. For a full discussion of these trends on the eve of the development of ties across the Straits see Gold, T. B., State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1986)Google Scholar.

21. For an excellent discussion of these issues see Moody, Peter R., Political Change on Taiwan (New York: Praeger, 1992), ch. 6, pp. 132–154Google Scholar.

22. Ibid. p. 136.

23. See the account in Long, Simon, Taiwan: China's Last Frontier (London: Macmillan, 1991), ch. 9, esp. pp. 203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. Interview with Sun Xiaoyu.

25. SWBFE/1199, p. i.

26. Moody, , Political Change on Taiwan, p. 133Google Scholar.

27. See the discussion in Long, , Taiwan, pp. 221–236Google Scholar.

28. See statements of alarm by the Mainland Affairs Council about capital outflow to the mainland of 17 May and 2 August 1993 in SWB FE/1693, p. A2/3 and FE/1760, p. Al/6 respectively. See also the caution by the Board of Trade of 29 April 1993 in FE/1676 A2/5.

29. For an interesting analysis see Kindermann, Gottfried-Karl, “Recent ROC-PRC unification policies in the light of the German experience”, Issues and Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5(05 1993)Google Scholar.

30. See A Bridge for Chinese, The Straits Exchange Foundation, Taipei, October 1991.

31. See Baum, Julian, “China-Taiwan, tactical manoeuvres: participants differ over meaning of Singapore talks”, FEER, 1305 1993, p. 12Google Scholar.

32. See for example, Government Information Office, Taipei June 1991, A Study of a Possible Communist Attack on Taiwan. The pamphlet cites 69 statements by senior military and political leaders threatening the possible use of force issued between April 1975 and 13 December 1990.

33. See “Would Beijing dare invade?” Newsweek, 23 December 1991, p. 36, and the claim by Defence Minister Chen Li-an on 28 October 1992 that Taiwan's present air force could repel any mainland attack, reported by Central News Agency in SWB FE/1530, pp. B/16–17, 5 November 1992.

34. For analysis of the former see Saich, Tony, “The 14th Party Congress: a programme for authoritarian rule”, The China Quarterly, No. 132 (12 1992), pp. 1136–1160Google Scholar. For an account of the latter see Baum, Julian, “The hollow centre: political result undermines President's power”, FEER, 0701 1993, pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

35. Author's interview with Legco member Huang Chenya of the UDHK, 21 August 1992.

36. For a clear account see Kau, Michael Ying-mao, “The ROC's new foreign policy strategy”, in Simon, Denis Fred and Kau, Michael Ying-mao (eds.), Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle (London & New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1992) pp. 237–255Google Scholar.

37. For an analysis of its role in PRC foreign policy-making see Shambaugh, David, “Peking's foreign policy conundrum since Tiananmen: peaceful coexistence vs. peaceful evolution”, Issues and Studies, 11 1992, pp. 65–84Google Scholar.

38. Tang, James T.H., “Hong Kong's international status”, Pacific Review, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1993), p. 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39. Zhiling, Lin and Robinson, Thomas W., “Domestic and international determinants of Chinese reunification”, The Journal of East Asian Affairs, Summer/Fall 1992, p. 430Google Scholar.

40. See the discussion by Winckler, Edwin A., “Taiwan transition?” in Tun-jen Cheng and Stephen Haggard (eds.), Political Change in Taiwan (Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992), pp. 221–259Google Scholar.

41. Lin, and Robinson, , “Domestic and international determinants”, p. 431Google Scholar.