Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:20:16.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fall of Chou Yang

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Merle Goldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

FOR more than twenty years, Chou Yang was chief guardian of Mao's literary policy. Next to Mao, he determined who was to write and what was to be written. In a series of relentless campaigns, he ruthlessly purged the ranks of China's most creative writers. Then suddenly in the summer of 1966, Chou Yang himself became the public target of the “great proletarian cultural revolution.”

Type
Recent Developments: The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 27 , September 1966 , pp. 132 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Compass for the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution,” Red Flag, No. 7, reprinted in Peking Review, No. 28, July 8, 1966.

2 Yang, Chou, Piao-hsien Hsin-ti Ch'ün-chung ti Shih-tai (To express the new age of the masses) (Peking: 1948), p. 1Google Scholar.

3 Lu Hsun Ch'ilan-chi (Complete works of Lu Hsun) (Peking: 1958), Vol. VI, p. 534Google Scholar.

4 Ibid. Attached to the 1958 edition of Lu Hsun's letter to Hsu Mou-yung is the editorial comment that because of Lu Hsun's illness at the time, it was Feng Hsueh-feng, not Lu Hsun, who actually drafted the reply.

5 Chung-kuo Hsien-tai Wen-hsueh Shih Ts'an-kao Tzu-liao (Research Materials on the History of Modern Chinese Literature) (Peking: 1960), pp. 565–566Google Scholar.

6 Ming-t'ang, Wang, “Hsu Chung-yü ti Lu Hsun Yen-chiu” (Hsü Chung-yü's “A Study of Lu Hsün”), Wen-yi Yueh-pao (Literature Monthly), No. 9, 1957, p. 16Google Scholar.

7 See Goldman, Merle, “Writers' Criticism of The Party in 1942,” The China Quarterly, No. 17, 01–03, 1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For further discussion Merle Goldman's forthcoming book, Literary Dissent in Communist China.

8 MacFarquhar, Roderick, The Hundred Flowers (London: Stevens, 1960) pp 177–178Google Scholar.

9 Ch'en Yi's speech given at the Peking Institute for Higher Studies was reprinted in Kuang-ming Daily, September 3, 1961.

10 People's Daily, July 22, 1966.

11 Ibid. August 7, 1966.

12 Ibid. July 30, 1966.

13 Kuang-ming Daily, September 3, 1961.

14 Shanghai Wen-hsueh, No. 5, 1962, p. 3Google Scholar.

15 Chinese Literature, No. 3, 1966Google Scholar.

16 Chou Hsin-fang was reported to have committed suicide in the summer of 1966.

17 Chi-yen, Wu, “Repudiate Chou Yang's Revisionist Programme for Literature and Art,” Peking Review, No. 34, 08 19, 1966, p. 38Google Scholar.