Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:41:21.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Resources in the Study of Elite Political Behaviour in Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Jonathan Sullivan
Jonathan Sullivan*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this article is to survey the abundance of primary source electronic data, and appropriate methods, which could be used to advance the study of elite politics in Taiwan. Research on public attitudes and voting behaviour has benefited enormously from open scholarly access to systematically collected, reliable data resources. Research on elite political behaviour in Taiwan could similarly benefit from the creation of supplementary datasets derived from electronic primary sources. I argue that the primary resources and methods needed are already in place, for instance, to produce quantitative estimates of the policy preferences and ideological positions of parties and individual political actors over time. A variety of political texts created by political actors at all levels of office (and indeed, in opposition) are readily accessible online. With a small degree of processing, these electronic texts can easily be rendered in machine-readable format for analysis by means of computer-assisted content analysis software. Despite successes in other contexts, these data and methods are currently underutilized in studies of elite political behaviour in Taiwan.

Keywords

Taiwanelectronic resourcespolitical behaviourelitesdata and methods
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 213 , March 2013 , pp. 172 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoit, Kenneth, Laver, Michael and Mikhaylov, Sasha. 2009. “Treating words as data with error: uncertainty in text statements of policy positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2), 495–513.Google Scholar
Carlson, Allen, and Hong, Duan. 2010. “Internet resources and the study of Chinese foreign relations.” In Carlson, Allen, Gallagher, Mary, Lieberthal, Kenneth and Manion, Melanie (eds.), Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods and Field Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 88–106.Google Scholar
Chen, Yu-Wen. 2011. “Quantitative content analysis of Chinese texts? A methodological note.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16(4), 431–443.Google Scholar
Chiou, Fang-Yi. 2010. “Divided government and legislative gridlock in Taiwan.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 7(3), 177–189.Google Scholar
Chuang, Po-Chung. 2009. “2005 nian xianshizhang xuanju jingxuanwangzhan fenxi: wanglu xingxiao zhi guandian” (Analysis of the 2005 Taiwan magistrate candidate websites: a perspective of internet marketing strategies). Xuanju pinglun 6, 31–53.Google Scholar
Yuan, Executive. 2003. “E-government development in Taiwan,” November, http://www.rdec.gov.tw/eng/. Accessed December 2011.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2000. “Online and on China: research sources in the information age.” The China Quarterly 163, 821–842.Google Scholar
Hansen, Derek, Shneiderman, Ben and Smith, Marc. 2010. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Jackson, Nigel. 2008. “Representation in the blogosphere: MPs and their new constituents.” Parliamentary Affairs 6(4), 642–660.Google Scholar
Krippendorf, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krippendorf, Klaus, and Bock, Mary (eds.). 2009. The Content Analysis Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lai, Chloe. 2008. “Leaders and laggards in politics of cyberspace,” South China Morning Post, 21 June.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data.” American Political Science Review 97(2), 311–331.Google Scholar
Lee, Sang, Tan, Xin and Trimi, Silvana. 2005. “Current practices of leading e-government countries.” Communications of the ACM 48(10), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, Da-chi. 2005. “How does a rubber stamp become a roaring lion? The transformation of the role of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan during the process of democratization 1950–2000.” Issues and Studies 41(3), 31–80.Google Scholar
Lo, Jin. 2008. “Maixiang dianzihua minzhu xin jieduan? Zhengfu wangzhan minzhuhua zhibiao jianli yu pinggu diaocha” (Towards an electronic democracy? Setting up the indicators for evaluating the democratization of the governmental websites in Taiwan). Dongwu zhengzhi xuebao 26(1), 143–198.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, Kimberley. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nystedt, Dan. 2009. “Twitter rival wins over popular Taiwanese politician,” 29 October, http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/10/29/urnidgns852573c4006938804825765e00174bd-idUS16366809820091029. Accessed February 2011.Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan. 2009. “Position taking in European Parliament speeches.” British Journal of Political Science 40(3), 587–611.Google Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2003. “An institutional approach to election campaigning in Taiwan.” Journal of Contemporary China 12(37), 765–779.Google Scholar
Roy, Denny. 2003. Taiwan: A Political History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stockman, Daniela. 2010. “Information overload? Collecting, managing and analysing Chinese media content.” Carlson, Allen, Gallagher, Mary, Lieberthal, Kenneth and Manion, Melanie (eds.), Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods and Field Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 107–128.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan. 2008. “Campaign advertising and democracy in Taiwan.” The China Quarterly 196, 900–911.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan. 2010. “Legislators' blogs in Taiwan.” Parliamentary Affairs 63(3), 471–485.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan, and Cheon, Sehun. 2011. “Reconnecting representatives in two East Asian democracies.” East Asia 28(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan, and Lowe, Will. 2010. “Chen Shui-bian: on independence.” The China Quarterly 203, 619–638.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan, and Renz, Bettina. 2010. “Chinese migration: still the major focus of Russian Far East/ Chinese Northeast relations?” The Pacific Review 23(2), 261–285.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan, and Sapir, Eliyahu V.. 2012. “Ma Ying-jeou's presidential discourse.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 41(3), 33–68.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Jonathan, Li, Yitan, James, Patrick and Drury, A. Cooper. 2011. “An exchange on diversionary dragons, or talking tough in Taipei.” Journal of East Asian Studies 11(1), 137–152.Google Scholar
Tung, Chen-Yuan, and Liu, Philip. 2004. “Online research on Taiwan–US–China relations.” Issues and Studies 40(3/4), 252–280.Google Scholar
West, Darrell. 2006. “Global E-Government, 2006,” www.insidepolitics.org/egot06int.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2012.Google Scholar
Woodly, Deva. 2008. “New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political communication.” Public Choice 134, 109–123.Google Scholar