Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:42:03.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

County Administration in Fukien

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Victor C. Falkenheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In most contemporary developing societies, the responsibility for directing broad social and economic change is assumed by the government. The success or failure of these government sponsored programmes often hinges narrowly on the degree of administrative capacity at the regional and local levels. Programmes which are otherwise well designed and funded at the national level may founder for lack of effective local organization.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 59 , September 1974 , pp. 518 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hart, Henry C., “The village and development administration,” in Heaphey, James J. (ed.), Spatial Dimensions of Development Administration (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1971Google Scholar).

2. Thomas, S. B., Government and Administration in Communist China, rev. ed. (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1955Google Scholar).

3. Harding, Harry Jr, “Maoist theories of policy making and organization,” in Robinson, Thomas W. (ed.), The Cultural Revolution in China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), p. 47Google Scholar.

4. Rustow, Dankwart, “Communism and change,” in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Change in Communist Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), p. 349Google Scholar.

5. Deutsch, Karl, “Cracks in the monolith,” Friedrich, Karl J. (ed.), Totalitarianism (New York: Universal Library, 1954Google Scholar).

6. Wilensky, Harold L., Organizational Intelligence (New York: Basic Books, 1967), p. 128Google Scholar.

7. The reference to a “pluralist” or “bureaucratic-pluralist” model is intended to denote an interpretational emphasis of the kind represented by Skilling, and Griffiths, (eds.), Interest Groups in the Soviet Union (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971Google Scholar). See also, Harasymiw, Bohdan, “Application of the concept pluralism to the Soviet political system,” Newsletter on Comparative Studies of Communism, Vol. V, No. 1 (11 1971Google Scholar).

8. I use the terms, county government, county authorities, county administrators or leaders, interchangeably in this essay assuming a general identity of interest and perspective among men who might be variously affiliated with different Party or State functional “systems.”

9. Barnett, A. Doak, Cadres, Bureaucracy and Power in Communist China (N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1967), p. 109Google Scholar.

10. Jen-min jih-pao (henceforward Jen-min), 12 October 1965.

11. Jen-min, 27 January 1966.

12. Fu-chien jih-pao (henceforward Fu-chien), 9 November 1957.

13. Fu-chien Shih-ch'ing (Fukien Affairs) (Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Commercial Bureau, 1917), p. 432Google Scholar.

14. Fu-chien Sheng ch'ung-chien Fang-an Ts'ao-an Hui-pien (Collection of Draft Plans for the Reconstruction of Fukien Province) (Taipei: Fukien Provincial Government, 1958), Vol. 1, pp. 14–21Google Scholar.

15. Fu-chien, 29 September 1959.

16. Fu-chien, 24 and 29 September 1959.

17. For a detailed discussion of the evolution of administrative structure of the county level, see Barnett, Cadres, Bureaucracy and Power in Communist China, part II.

18. For a discussion of the administrative control functions of provincial government, see my “Provincial leadership in Fukien, 1949–1966,” in Scalapino, Robert (ed.), Elites in the Peoples’ Republic of China (Seattle: University of Washington Press), 1972Google Scholar.

19. Fu-chien, 3 January 1953.

20. For a full description of each campaign and the data used, see my unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, “Provincial administration in Fukien: 1949–1966” (Columbia University, 1972Google Scholar).

21. Fu-chien, 19 February 1952.

22. Ibid. 28 February 1953.

23. Ibid. 19 February 1952.

24. Jen-min, 12 October 1965.

25. Fu-chien, 28 February 1957.

26. Ibid. 18 March 1957.

27. Ibid. 15 January 1957.

28. Tse-tung, Mao, “Sixty articles on methods of work,” in What's Happening on the Chinese Mainland, Vol. I, No. 22 (16 11 1969), p. 1Google Scholar.

29. Fu-chien, 3 January 1953.

30. The text of Li Fu-ch'un's, “Report on the first Five-Year Plan” can be found in Current Background, No. 335Google Scholar.

31. Fu-chien, 12 October 1957.

32. Li Fu-ch'un, “Report on the first Five-Year Plan.”

33. Fu-chien, 12 October 1957.

34. Ibid. 9 October 1957.

35. Ibid. 6 October, 1957.

36. Ibid. 25 September 1957.

37. Ibid. 23 October 1957.

38. Ibid. 12 October 1957.

39. Ibid. 23 October 1957.

40. Ibid. 21 October 1958.

41. To follow these changes see Fu-chien, 21 October 1957, 12 February 1958 and 7 March 1958.

42. Ibid. 4 and 14 April 1958.

43. Ibid. 26 December 1957.

44. Ibid. 6 and 14 February 1958.

45. Ordinarily education news during the 1950s was featured on p. 3 of this four-page daily.

46. Fu-chien, 28 January 1958, 14 February 1958 and 4 March 1958.

47. Ibid. 14 February 1958.

48. Ibid. 18 April 1958.

49. Etzioni, Amitai, Complex Organization (New York: The Free Press, 1961), pp. [3–4Google Scholar.

50. Donnithorne, Audrey, China's Economic System (London: Allen and Unwin, 1967), p. 58Google Scholar.

51. Fu-chien, 21 January 1958.

52. Ibid. 5 March 1958.

53. Ibid. 7 March 1958.

54. Ibid. 21 January 1958.

55. Fu-chien, 1 March 1958.

56. Ibid. 28 February 1958.

57. Plan fulfilment data for the four campaigns from left to right, can be found in ibid. 18 April 1958, 3 April 1958.

58. Figures on fertilizer drive fulfilment in Fu-chien, 23 March 1958, 18 April 1958; water conservancy drive figures in ibid. 4 February 1958, 2 April 1958.

59. I have assumed the general reliability of Chinese data throughout this analysis. This is not the place to defend that assumption, but suffice it to say that without it all work on Chinese politics and society becomes impossible. More questionably, I have assumed that the four campaigns studied offer a reasonable gauge of county compliance, an assumption that is far from impregnable.

60. Fu-chien, 25 January 1958.

61. Ibid. 13 January 1953.

62. Jen-min, n.d., Radio Peking, 21 November 1972.

63. Ibid. 25 October 1965.

64. Fu-chien, 28 February 1958.

65. Ibid. 28 February 1958.

66. Ibid. 28 February 1958.

67. Apter, David, The Politics of Modernization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), pp. 40–42Google Scholar.

68. Fu-chien, 9 October 1957.

69. Mao Tse-tung, “Sixty articles on methods of work.”

70. Walker, Kenneth R., “Organization for agricultural production,” in Galenson, Eckstein, and Liu, (eds), Economic Trends in Communist China (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1968), pp. 404–405Google Scholar.

71. Bernstein, Thomas P., “Keeping the Revolution going,” in Lewis, John Wilson (ed.), Party Leadership and Revolutionary Power in China (London: Cambridge University Press, 1974), p. 261Google Scholar.