Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Among the many extraordinary developments attendant to China's transition from the Maoist era, one of the most significant - both for China and the rest of the world - has been the growing participation of the f People's Republic of China (PRC) in the global community. Emerging from an isolation which was by turns self-imposed and externally enforced, the PRC has rapidly embraced a wide range of international T relations, including membership of most international organizations, in [ stark contrast to its situation before the late 1970s. For many reasons, this increasing involvement with other nations has necessitated far greater f attention to international law than was common during the Maoist period. At the level of public international law, many more treaties have f been concluded; with respect to international business, a burgeoning sector of China's domestic economy now depends on long-term foreign j investment fostered by protective regulations. Far-flung foreign trade and Chinese investments abroad have even forced the PRC government to f litigate actively as a defendant in foreign courts, a prospect almost unimaginable 20 years ago.
1. For an exhaustive study of the theory and practice of this period (1949–74), see Cohen, Jerome A. and Chiu, Hungdah, People's China and International Law (2 vols.) (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
2. Samuel S. Kim, “The People's Republic of China and the charter-based international legal order,” American Journal of International Law, No. 72 (1978), p. 317.Google Scholar
3. See, e.g.Munro, Ross, “Awakening dragon,” Policy Review (Fall 1992)Google Scholar; Homer, Charles, “China on the rise,” Commentary (December 1992)Google Scholar; and Conable, Barber B. Jr., and Lampton, David M., “China: the coming power,” Foreign Affairs (Winter 1992–93).Google Scholar
4. A Barnett, Doak and Clough, Ralph, Modernizing China: Post-Mao Reform and Development (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986).Google Scholar
5. See e.g.Feinerman, James V., “Chinese law relating to foreign investment and trade: the decade of reform in retrospect,” in Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, China's Economic Dilemmas in the 1990s: The Problems of Reforms, Modernization, and Interdependence (Washington, DC, 1991), pp. 828–840.Google Scholar
6. Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave, 2nd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979), p. 45.Google Scholar
7. Ibid. pp. 109–110.
8. Wright, Mary C., “Introduction: the rising tide of change,” in Wright, Mary C. (ed.), China in Revolution: The First Phase, 1900–1913 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
9. Tieya, Wang, ‘Teaching and research on international law in present day China,” Columbia Transnational Journal of Law, Vol. 22 (1983), pp. 1–232.Google Scholar
10. Tiqiang, E.G. Chen, “The People's Republic of China and public international law,” Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 8 (January 1984), pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
11. Law of the People's Republic of China on Joint Equity Enterprises (adopted 1 July 1979; amended 4 April 1990). The Chinese text and English translation appear in CCH Australia Ltd. (ed.), 1 China Laws for Foreign Business (1985)Google Scholar, para. 6–600 at 7,801.
12. See e.g.Burns, John F., “Why investors are sour on China,” New York Times, 8 June 1986Google Scholar, at C7, col. 1; Burns, “A.M.C.'s troubles in China,” New York Times, 11 April 1986, at D4, col. 1; Schiffman, James R., “AMC jeep venture trying to get back on track after Peking helps to ease currency squeeze,” Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, 25 August 1986Google Scholar, at p. 4. See also Browning, Graeme, If Everybody Bought One Shoe (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1989).Google Scholar Interestingly, most of the negative features were publicized well before the Beijing Massacre of 1989.
13. Brecher, Richard, “The end of investment's wonder years,” The China Business Review, January-February 1990, at pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
14. The Law of the People's Republic of China Concerning Enterprises with Sole Foreign Investment (adopted 11 April 1986). The Chinese text and an English translation appear in 1 China Laws for Foreign Business, para. 13–506 at 16,651.
15. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Sino-Foreign Co-operative Enterprises, (adopted 13 April 1988). The Chinese text and an English translation appear in /China Laws for Foreign Business, para. 6–100 at 7,551.
16. Interim Regulations of the People's Republic of China Concerning the Control of Resident Offices of Foreign Enterprises (promulgated 30 October 1980). The Chinese text and an English translation appear in China Laws for Foreign Business, para 7–500 at 9,051.
17. The Constitution of the People's Republic of China, Art. 18 (adopted 4 December 1982) (foreign enterprises, other foreign economic organizations and individual foreigners are permitted to invest and to enter into economic co-operation with Chinese enterprises and economic organizations) (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1983).
18. Regulations for the Implementation of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Joint Ventures Using Chinese and Foreign Investment (adopted 20 September 1983). The Chinese text and an English translation appear in China Laws for Foreign Business, para. 6–550.
19. See Stein, Laura, “Wholly foreign owned ventures in China: a comparison of 3M China Ltd., Grace China Ltd, and the New Foreign Enterprise Law,” China Law Reporter, Vol. 4 (1987), p. 1Google Scholar. An English translation of the “Law of People's Republic of China on Enterprises Operated Exclusively with Foreign Capital,” appears in Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Daily Report: China, 14 April 1986Google Scholar at K13-K15; reprinted in China Law Reporter, Vol. 4 (1987), p. 63.
20. See Pow, Elson and Moser, Michael, “Law and investment in China's special investment areas,” in Michael, Moser (ed.), Foreign Trade, Investment, and the Law in the People's Republic of China, 2nd ed. (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.
21. Provisions of the State Council of the People's Republic of China for the Encouragement of Foreign Investment (promulgated 11 October 1986). An English translation appears in China Daily, 4 November 1986, at p. 2.
22. Moser, Michael and Zee, Winston, China Tax Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar and Easson, A. J. and Li, Jinyan, Taxation of Foreign Investment in the People's Republic of China (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1989).Google Scholar
23. Capener, Cole, “An American in Beijing: perspectives on the rule of law in China,” Brigham Young University Law Review (1988), p. 567 at p. 587.Google Scholar
24. Article 75 provides: “The unbalance [of foreign exchange] shall be solved by the people's government of a relevant province, an autonomous region or a municipality directly under the central government or the department in charge under the State Council from their own foreign exchange reserves….”
25. Regulations of the State Council Concerning the Balance of Foreign Exchange Income and Expenditure by Sino-Foreign Joint Equity Ventures (promulgated 15 January 1986). The Chinese text and an English translation appear in I China Laws for Foreign Business, para. 6–590 at 8,031.
26. Young, , “Foreign exchange control of financial institutions,” East Asian Executive Reports, February 1988, at pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
27. Sneider, David, “The Baoshan debacle: a study of Sino-Japanese contract dispute settlement,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 18, No. 2 (1986), at p. 541.Google Scholar
28. Macneil, Roderick, “Contract in China: law, practice, and dispute resolution,” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 2 (1986), at p. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Engholm, Christopher, The China Venture: America's Corporate Encounter with the People's Republic of China (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1989).Google Scholar
30. Hayden, David, “The role of contract law in developing the Chinese legal culture,” Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 10 (1987), p. 571.Google Scholar
31. Lubman, S. and Wajnowski, G., “International commercial dispute resolution in China: a practical assessment,” The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 107—78 (New York: Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law, Columbia University, 1993)Google Scholar (contains text of new China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules, effective 1 June 1994).
32. “PRC amends Joint Venture Law,” Asian Law & Practice, Vol. 2, No. 3 (16 April 1990), at p. 35.
33. Harding, Harry, “The investment climate in China,” The Brookings Review, Spring 1987, at p. 37Google Scholar (describing the 22 articles designed to encourage foreign investment issued in October 1986; Harding concluded that even if the articles were interpreted fairly and implemented effectively, they addressed only a fraction of the problems encountered by the foreign business community).
34. Robertson, Dario F. and Chen, Xiaokang, “New amendments to China's Equity Joint Venture Law: changes unlikely to stimulate foreign investment,” East Asian Executive Reports, April 1990, at p. 9.Google Scholar
35. See Schaller, George, The Last Panda (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Ross, Lester, Environmental Policy in China (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
36. Xi, Wang and Blomquist, Robert F., “The developing environmental law and policy of the People's Republic of China: an introduction and appraisal,” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 5 (Fall 1992), pp. 25–75.Google Scholar
37. Li Jinchang. “Promote the implementation of international environmental accords,” unpublished manuscript on file with the author (1992). Li is vice-director of China's National Environmental Protection Administration.
38. Panikkar, Raimundo, “Is the notion of human rights a Western concept,” Diogenes, Vol. 120, pp. 75–102.Google Scholar
39. Donnelly, J., “Cultural relativism and universal human rights,” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 6 (1984), pp. 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. For China, see Alford, William, “Making a goddess of democracy from loose sand: thoughts on human rights in the People's Republic of China,” in Abdullahi, An-Na'im (ed.), Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992).Google Scholar A more general perspective is provided by Alston, Philip, “The Universal Declaration at 35: Western and passe or alive and universal?” International Commission of Jurists Review, Vol. 31 (1983), pp. 60–70.Google Scholar
41. Bilder, Richard, “Rethinking international human rights: some basic questions,” Human Rights Journal, Vol. 2 (1969), pp. 557–608.Google Scholar
42. Such as China's accession to Genocide, Torture and Women's Conventions.
43. Sohn, Louis, “The human rights law of the Charter,” Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 12 (1977), pp. 129–140.Google Scholar
44. Driscoll, Dennis, “The development of human rights in international law,” in Walter, Laqueur and Barry, Rubin (eds.), The Human Rights Reader (New York: New American Library, 1979), pp. 41–56, at p. 43.Google Scholar
45. Gardeniers, Ton, Hannum, Hurst and Kruger, Janice, “The UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities: recent developments,” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 4 (1982), pp. 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Schwelb, E., Human Rights and the International Community: The Roots and Growth of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948–1963 (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1964).Google Scholar
47. Renteln, Alison D., International Human Rights: Universalism Versus Relativisim (Newbury Park: Sage, 1990), p. 15.Google Scholar
48. Schifter, Richard, “Human rights: a Western cultural bias?” Current Policy, No. 1105 (Washington, D.C.: Department of State. Bureau of Public Affairs, 1988), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
49. Tolley, H. Jr., The UN Commission on Human Rights (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988).Google Scholar
50. United States Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1989, “China,” p. 802: “At least several hundred, and possibly thousands, of people were killed in Beijing on June 3–4.”
51. Wudunn, Sheryl, “China releases 97 held in protests,” New York Times, 7 June 1990, p. A15Google Scholar (this action brought to 881 the total officially reported to have been released; it is unclear how many remain behind bars).
52. Qing, Dai, “My imprisonment,” Ming bao, 20–29 May 1990, translated in raiS Daily Report: China, 28–30 May 1990.Google Scholar
53. Asia Watch, Punishment Season: Human Rights in China after Martial Law, ch. 2, “Death sentences and executions,” pp. 83–86.
54. Wudunn, Sheryl, “China cracking down on sale of women as wives,” New York Times, 3 December 1989, p. 3.Google Scholar
55. International Committee of Lawyers for Tibet. Report on the Current Situation in Tibet, 1990, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar See also Urumqi Xinjiang Television Networks, “Counterrevolutionary activities under a religious banner are absolutely prohibited,” reported in FBIS Daily Report: China, 15 May 1990, p. 62.Google Scholar
56. Report, , “Law professor denounces ‘absurd arguments’ on human rights,” Xinhua News Agency, 26 March 1990Google Scholar, monitored by British Broadcasting Corporation, Summary of World Broadcasts, 4 April 1990, FE/0730/B2/1 (Peking University international law Professor Zhao Lihai attacks interference in China's internal affairs and wilful trampling upon the norms governing international relations).
57. Article, “Third-World arms industries: swords not ploughshares,” The Economist, 21 March 1991.
58. Bitzinger, Richard, “Arms to go: Chinese arms sales to the Third World,” International Security, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Fall 1992), pp. 84–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Ibid.
60. Woon, Eden Y., “Chinese arms sales and U.S.-China military relations,” Asian Survey, Vol. 29 (June 1989), p. 604CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shichor, Yitzhak, East Wind over Arabia: Origins and Implications of the Sino-Saudi Missile Deal (Berkeley: University of California, Institute of East Asian Studies, China Research Monograph No. 35, 1989).Google Scholar
61. Harding, Harry, A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China since 1972 (Washington: The Brookings Institute, 1992), p. 189.Google Scholar
62. Ibid.
63. Bitzinger, “Arms to go,” p. 108.
64. Mann, Jim, “U.S. fears China is seeking missile deal with Iran,” Los Angeles Time, 3 April 1992.Google Scholar
65. Department for Disarmament Affairs, Report of the Secretary-General, Nuclear Weapons: A Comprehensive Study, I, Appendix, “Official doctrinal positions of the nuclear-weapon states: basic positions of the government of China on nuclear weapons and nuclear disarmament” (New York: United Nations, 1991), p. 135.Google Scholar
66. See Xinhua News Agency, “China's instrument of accession to Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty,” 11 March 1992Google Scholar, Item No. 0311170, available on LEXIS/NEXIS Electronic News Retrieval Service.
67. Ibid.
68. Mack, Andrew, “Missile proliferation in the Asia/Pacific region,” in Trevor, Findlay (ed.), Chemical Weapons and Missile Proliferation, with Implications for the Asia/Pacific Region (Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner, 1991), pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
69. “Chinese exports of missiles suspected,” Washington Times, 28 March 1990.
70. “CIA Chief wary of Pakistan nuclear program,” New York Times, 19 May 1989. 71. See Anderson, David, “The international arms trade: regulating conventional arms transfers in the aftermath of the Gulf War,” American University Journal on International Law and Policy, Vol. 7 (1992), p. 749Google Scholar, at p. 774 (citing Stockholm International Peace Institute Yearbook figures on arms sales).
72. Ibid, (citing Congressional Research Service study, Middle East Arms Control and Related Issues, p. 81 (1991).
73. Anderson, Jack, “The growing chemical club,” Washington Post, 24 August 1984.Google Scholar
74. Harris, Elisa D., New Threats: Responding to the Proliferation of Nuclear, Chemical and Delivery Capabilities in the Third World (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990).Google Scholar
75. See “The UN: China's disarmament proposal,” Beijing Review, No. 28 (12 July 1982), p. 11. See also James Hsiung, Law and Policy in China's Foreign Relations (1972); Shao-chuan, Leng and Hungdah, Chiu (eds.), Law in Chinese Foreign Policy: Communist China and Selected Problems of International Law (Dubbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1972).Google Scholar
76. See “Renmin ribao discusses laws applicable to foreigners,” FBIS-CHI-80–027 (7 February 1980), at L21. (“Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state.”) See also Salem, David, The People's Republic of China, International Law and Arms Control (Baltimore: Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, School of Law, University of Maryland, 1983), p. 48.Google Scholar
77. Editorial, , “Peking's revenge,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 18 July 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar
78. Lau, Emily, ‘Turbulence in transit,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 24 January 1991, p. 21.Google Scholar
79. Qiwu, Zhu, “What is necessary for the validity of Hong Kong's contracts and leases to extend beyond 1997? - On the validity of the contract for Hong Kong container terminal no. 9 and related issues,” Dagong bao, 8 December 1992, p. 2Google Scholar, translated in FBIS Daily Report: China, 9 December 1992, pp. 69–70.
80. Huo, Hwei-Ling, “Patterns of behavior in China's foreign policy,” Asian Survey, Vol. 32, No. 3 (March 1992), pp. 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar