Article contents
China's International Trade: Policy and Organizational Change and their Place in the ‘Economic Readjustment‘
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Extract
There are three aspects of China's foreign economic relations which are important to our efforts to understand the Readjustment of 1979–84. These are: (a) the government's general orientation towards foreign economic relations; (b) quantitative trends in investment and trade flows; and, (c) the nature of trade organization and international economic links. The general orientation to trade is critical in a planned economy where central preferences (essentially political) are easily reflected throughout the system. Stalin's policy of autarchy transformed the international role of the Soviet economy, while in China, Mao Zedong's willingness to trade with the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc profoundly changed the character of the Chinese economy between 1953 and 1959. Large-scale plant imports created new industries and enlarged heavy industries established – particularly in the north-east – before 1949. This phase of policy had exhausted itself in China towards the end of the 1950s, although import data for 1959 reflect prior commitments and give little sign of this. However, the reality was that China's capacity to absorb imported capital goods, and the agricultural capacity to sustain foreign exchange earnings at the necessary level, were both weakening even before the dislocations of the Great Leap radically changed the role of foreign trade by converting China from a net food exporter to a net importer.
- Type
- The Readjustment in the Chinese Economy
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The China Quarterly 1984
References
1. Xinhua (New China) News Agency (Xinhua), 11 November 1976; ibid. 15 January 1977; Renmin ribao (People's Daily), 20 April 1977.
2. Qiang, Li, “Distinguish the correct line; actively develop socialist foreign trade,” Honqi (Red Flag), No. 10 (1977), pp. 31–38Google Scholar;
3. Xinhua, 13 May 1977.
4. Xinhua, 17 October 1978.
5. Dixin, Xu, “Overcome the influence of leftist thought,” Jingji guanli (Economic Management), No. 4 (1979), pp. 2–6Google Scholar;
6. Huiqin, Chen, “The trend in technology imports must be changed,” Jingji guanli. No. 4 (1981), pp. 22–25Google Scholar; Lin Senmu, “The lesson of the 22 whole plant imports,” ibid. No. 6 (1981), pp. 12–14.
7. Renmin ribao, 17 June 1980.
8. Dixin, Xu et al. “Proceed from reality; follow objective economic laws,” Jingji yanjiu (Economic Research), No. 3 (1981)Google Scholar; Wang Jiye, “Grasp Readjustment; stabilize the economy,” ibid. No. 1 (1981), pp. 3–10.
9. Guangyuan, Yu, “The work of foreign trade should serve Readjustment,” Jingji guanli, No. 1 (1981), pp. 16–26Google Scholar.
10. Tangren, Shen, “The prospects for foreign trade in 1981 and the current reform of trade organization,” Guoji maoyi wenti (Problems of International Trade), No. 1 (1981)Google Scholar; editorial on “Trade and Readjustment,” ibid. No. 2 (1981).
11. For a detailed analysis see Y. Y. Kueh, “China's food balance and the world grain trade: projections for 1985, 1990 and 2000,” Asian Survey (forthcoming).
12. Ibid.
13. Ta Kung Pao (Impartial Daily) (Hong Kong), 7 02 1983, p. 1Google Scholar.
14. Ta Kung Pao, 14 April 1984, p. 2; see also Deqin, Jin, “Role played by the Bank of China in technology import,” Guoji maoyi (International Trade), No. 12 (1983), pp. 5–6Google Scholar.
15. Ta Kung Pao, 16 November 1983, p. 3, and South China Morning Post, 11 March 1983.
16. Ta Kung Pao, 30 April 1984, p. 2, and South China Morning Post, Business News Supplement, 1 May 1984, p. 10.
17. South China Morning Post, 9 March 1983.
18. Ta Kung Pao, 23 and 24 March 1983.
19. Hongqi, editorial, “Problems concerning China's foreign economic relations,” No. 8 (1982), p. 5Google Scholar.
20. Ta Kung Pao, 7 April 1984, p.l. These include Dalian, Qinhuangdao, Tianjin, Yantai, Qingdao, Lianyungang, Nantong, Shanghai, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Zhanjiang, Beihai.
21. State Statistical Bureau (SSB), Annual Communiqué 1983.
22. See especially, Monk, Liliana B. and Rich, A. Jackson, “Recent developments in China's trade practices, 1978–81,” China Under the Four Modernizations, Pt 2. Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982), pp. 210–34Google Scholar; and Davie, and Carver, , “China's international trade and finance,” pp. 19–47Google Scholar.
23. Hong, Ma, Xiandai Zhongguo jingji shidian (The Contemporary Chinese Economy: A Compendium) (Beijing, 1982), p. 366Google Scholar.
24. For a complete list of various trading corporations in 1982 see, China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (Department of Public Relations), China's Foreign Trade Corporations and Organizations (Beijing, 1982)Google Scholar.
25. Communication from an anonymous western trade partner working in Hong Kong.
26. Hong, Ma, The Contemporary Chinese Economy, p. 366Google Scholar.
27. Ibid. For more concrete examples see Geng, Li, “Vigorously organize the export of mechanical and electrical products,” Jingji guanli, No. 3 (1982), pp. 30–33Google Scholar;
28. Gang, Shao, “Problems of foreign trade system reform,” Guoji maoyi wenli, No. 2 (1980), p. 24Google Scholar; Jingji daobao (Economic Reporter Weekly) (Hong Kong), 8 04 1981, p. 5Google Scholar; and Chen, Nai-Ruenn, “China's capital construction: current retrenchment and prospects for foreign participation,” China Under the Four Modernizations, Pt 2, p. 66Google Scholar;
29. Hong, Ma, The Contemporary Chinese Economy, pp. 365–66Google Scholar;
30. Zhang, Zhong Zhi, “Problems of adopting the internal exchange settlement rate for foreign trade,” Jingji daobao, 21 01 1981, p. 15Google Scholar; Chen, Nai-Ruenn, “China's capital construction,” p. 66Google Scholar cited a total of 17 categories.
31. See Kueh, Y. Y., “Economic reform in China at the xian level,” The China Quarterly, No. 96 (1983), pp. 665–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar;
32. Davie, and Carver, , “China's international trade,” p. 24Google Scholar;
33. Ta Kung Pao, 20 Feburary 1983; ibid. 19 February 1983; Ming Pao (Enlightenment Daily) (Hong Kong), 24 November 1983; and materials in Guoji maoyi, Nos. 3 and 4 (1984), pp. 7–10 and 11–13Google Scholar;
34. For the full text see Zhonghua renmin gongheguo guowuyuan gongbao (Bulletin of the State Council of the People's Republic of China), No. 21 (1983), pp. 969–86Google Scholar;
35. Sakurai, Masao, “Investing in China: the legal framework,” Jetro China Newsletter, No. 37 (1982), pp. 7–9Google Scholar;
36. The long-awaited China Patent Law was finally promulgated on 12 March 1984, but will not take effect until 1 April 1985. For the full text, see Ta Kung Pao, 14 March 1984, p. 3.
37. Ta Kung Pao, 7 April 1982. See also Chai, Joseph, “Industrial cooperation between China and Hong Kong,” Youngson, A. J. (ed.), China and Hong Kong: The Economic Nexus (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 116–20Google Scholar; for similar problems encountered by Hong Kong businessmen investing in China.
38. Masao Sakurai, “Investing in China.”
39. Ta Kung Pao, 20 March 1983.
40. Ibid. 9 April 1983 and 18 May 1983, 4 January 1984, p. 3; and 24 February 1984, p. 3. The concessions stipulated will indeed help reduce effective income tax rate for the joint ventures from the original level of 33% down to 18·91% for the first five years, see especially Ta Kung Pao, 22 February 1984, p. 3. Besides, provisions for accelerated depreciations are also available.
41. Ibid. 9 April 1983.
42. These were lately announced by Gu Mu, see ibid. 8 June 1984, p. 3.
43. For more details about the comparative attractiveness of the various forms of joint ventures see also Hong, Ma, The Contemporary Chinese Economy pp. 384–85Google Scholar; and Yinyong, Zheng, “Make use of foreign funds to serve the technical transformation of our existing enterprises,” Guoji maoyi, No. 3 (1983), pp. 27–28Google Scholar;
44. Ta Kung Poo, 11 March 1984, p. 1.
45. Zhongguo jingji tequ nianjian 1983 (China's Special Economic Zones' Yearbook 1983) (Hong Kong, 1983), p. 146Google Scholar; The figures given here are nearly identical with those cited by Hong, Ma, The Contemporary Chinese Economy, p. 391Google Scholar (viz. HK$7,760 million pledged and HK$1,200 million used), except that the number of investment projects involved is given by Ma Hong as 1,067.
46. Hong, Ma, The Contemporary Chinese Economy, p. 391Google Scholar. See also Jao, Y. C., “Hong Kong's role in financing China's modernization,” Youngson, A. J. (ed.), China and Hong Kong: The Economic Nexus, pp. 50–53Google Scholar.
47. The value figure is originally given in Ta Kung Pao, 1 December 1983, p. 3, in Hong Kong dollars in the amount of $1,334 million. We used an exchange rate of US$1.00 = HK$5.1 (prevailing in 1980/81) to convert it to US$ equivalent for purpose of comparison with the pledged investment value of US$1,500 cited earlier for 1980–81.
48. The subsidy involved in exporting is known in the European context as Preisausgleich and is discussed in, Wiles, P. J. D., Communist International Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968)Google Scholar; Chs 6 and 7, and in, Pryor, Frederic L., The Communist Foreign Trade System (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1963)Google Scholar; Ch. IV.
49. These issues are discussed in the Chinese context in, Xuehan, Xu, “A discussion of the problem of the ‘false losses’ in exports,” Caimao jingji (Finance and Trade Economics), No. 2 (1984), pp. 5–9Google Scholar;
50. Sometimes the two terms are used to mean exactly the reverse relations, see Nianlu, Wu, “Relations between exchange rate and export transactions,” Guoji maoyi. No. 1 (1983), p. 39Google Scholar; and Gonghao, Li, “An initial exploration with regard to the pricing problems of imports and exports,” in Shejie jingji wenhui (World Economy Forum), No. 1 (1983), p. 38Google Scholar;
51. Qixue, Guan et al. , “The problem of Guangdong's export structure looked at from the perspective of economic efficacy,” Xueshu yanjiu (Academic Study), No. 6 (1980), pp. 25–29Google Scholar;
52. Guoji maoyi lunwen xuan (Select Articles on International Trade) (Beijing, 1982); Ch. 25, pp. 367–68Google Scholar.
53. Gonghao, Li, “An initial exploration,” p. 39Google Scholar;
54. See for example: Zhaojin, Liu, “Preliminary discussion on reform of foreign trade system,” Guoji maoyi wenti, No. 1 (1980), pp. 14Google Scholar and 26–30; Shao Gang, “Problems of foreign trade system reform,” ibid. No. 2 (1980), pp. 22–25; and Wang Yuxuan and Zhang Yifang “Problems concerning the reform of economic management system as viewed from the export of mechanical and electrical products,” ibid. No. 1 (1980), pp. 34–38 and 49; for a more general description of the Chinese trade system reform see Morino, Tomozo, “Reforms in China's trade system,” in Jetro China Newsletter, No. 41 (11–12 1982), pp. 14–18Google Scholar.
55. For a more general policy discussion about how to make use of market regulations without challenging the integrated core of planning in the export sector see, Shiwei, Xu “On the foreign trade system of our country,” Guoji maoyi wenti, No. 2 (1983), pp. 8–13Google Scholar; Actually the partial marketization process in the export sector and the ensuing price competition has already met with very strong criticism from responsible cadres of the Ministry of Foreign Trade, see, e.g. Cheng Jixian, “Some opinions on the reform of foreign trade system,” ibid. No. 1 (1980), pp. 19 and 20–21.
56. Gonghao, Li, “An initial exploration,” p. 40Google Scholar;
57. A Shanghai survey of light industrial products showed that 70% of all commodities were in styles of the 1950s and 1960s; 20% in styles of the 1930s and 1940s, and only a handful in styles of the 1980s, Yu, Su and Shun, Guo, “Speed up export bases; construct specialist factories, and develop foreign trade,” Jingji guanli. No. 4 (1984), pp. 11–13Google Scholar;
58. Chinese shoes, for example, fetch one-tenth of Italian prices, ibid. pp. 11–13, and porcelain prices are of a similar order of magnitude by comparison with West German and Japanese prices.
- 16
- Cited by