Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:43:13.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can “Tax-for-Fee” Reform Reduce Rural Tension in China? The Process, Progress and Limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2004

Abstract

This article questions the effectiveness and viability of the fiscal response to rural stability adopted by the Chinese state. Tax-for-fee reform (feigaishui) has been heralded as a possible solution to the cancer of excessive fiscal predation by local government. While the experiment may have achieved in relief of peasant burden, the success is simply based on central government financial sponsorship and is thus hardly sustainable as a national programme. And unless there is fundamental reform of fiscal redistribution, the new scheme will ironically hurt rather than help the poorest peasants. Putting all the blame on local cadres is politically expedient, but the central government needs to admit that the present crisis is a result of the systemic discrimination against peasants and the consequent deficit in financing rural governance. The ultimate solution entails a full-scale eradication of structural bias against the peasantry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The China Quarterly, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This is a part of a project on rural governance in China. The project is funded by Direct Allocation Grant of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Hong Kong. The author is also indebted to Bates Gill and Ian Holliday for their useful comments. He is also grateful for the assistance provided by Jacqueline Yu and Angela Stavropoulos.