Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:04:50.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Autumn Harvest: Peasants and Markets in Post-Collective Rural China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Xueguang Zhou
Xueguang Zhou
Affiliation:
Stanford University. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the peasants in rural China, the harvest season is the occasion when several different worlds – the business world of large companies, the entrepreneurial world of middlemen, local elites and peasant households – are compressed into the same social space, thereby inducing intensive economic and social interactions and crystallizing social relations among villagers, local elites and markets. Based on ethnographic research on the autumn harvest in a township in northern China, this study sheds light on distinctive modes of market transactions across produces, and diverse interactions between markets and local institutions involving different co-ordination mechanisms, rhythms and social relationships. A more nuanced image of market transactions emerges from these observations, calling for a more refined conceptualization of markets and further research on their implications for institutional changes.

Keywords

peasantsrural marketcapitalmarket chainrural China
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 208 , December 2011 , pp. 913 - 931
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Skinner, G. William, “Marketing and social structure in rural China, part I,” Journal of Asian Studies (1964), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Skinner, , “Rural marketing in China: repression and revival,” The China Quarterly, No. 103 (1985), pp. 393–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skinner, , “Presidential address: the structure of Chinese history,” Journal of Asian Studies, No. 44 (1985), pp. 271–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Duara, Prasenjit, Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900–1942 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Huang, Philip C., The Peasant Economy and Social Change in North China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Huang, Philip C., The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the Yangzi Delta (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

3 Nee, Victor, “A theory of market transition,” American Sociological Review, No. 54 (1989), pp. 663–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oi, Jean C., Rural China Takes Off (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999)Google Scholar. Walder, Andrew G., “Local governments as industrial firms,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 101 (1995), pp. 263–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Parish, William L. and Michelson, Ethan, “Politics and markets: dual transformation,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 101 (1996), pp. 1042–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Bian, Yanjie and Logan, John W., “Market transition and the persistence of power,” American Sociological Review, No. 61 (1996), pp. 739–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oi, Rural China Takes Off; Walder, “Local governments as industrial firms”; Zhou, Xueguang, “Economic transformation and income inequality in urban China,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 105 (2000), pp. 1135–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Studies in the sociology of China have touched on the role of markets but few takes markets as the focus of analysis; see Nee “Market transition”; Peng, Yusheng, “Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 109 (2004), pp. 1045–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wu, Xiaogang and Xie, Yu, “Does the market pay off?” American Sociological Review, No. 68 (2003), pp. 425–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Granovetter, Mark, “Economic action and social structure,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 91 (1985), pp. 481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hamilton, Gary G. and Biggart, Nicole Woolsey, “Market, culture, and authority,” American Journal of Sociology, No. 94 (1988), pp. S52–S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zelizer, Viviana A., The Social Meaning of Money (New York: Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar.

8 Agricultural economists have made significant contributions in this area. See e.g. Rozelle, Scottet al., “Continuity and change in China's rural periodic markets,” The China Journal (2003), pp. 89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Park, Albertet al., “Market mergence and transition,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (2002), pp. 67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Park, Albertet al., “Bureaucrat to entrepreneur,” Economic Development and Cultural Changes (2000), pp. 227–52Google Scholar; de Brauw, Alanet al., “Responsiveness, flexibility and market liberalization in China's agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (2000), pp. 1133–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Siu, Helen, “Socialist peddlers and princes in a Chinese market town,” American Ethnologist, No. 16 (1989), pp. 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chan, Anita, Madsen, Richard and Unger, Jonathan, Chan Village (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

9 Friedman, Edward, Pickowicz, Paul G. and Selden, Mark, Chinese Village, Socialist State (New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

10 Between 2004 and 2010 I travelled to FS township many times each year, including three harvest seasons, to conduct participatory observations of rural life. Unless otherwise indicated, the quotations and descriptions in the text are drawn from my fieldnotes.

11 Outflow of migrant workers in FS township varies greatly across villages. In grape-growing villages, labour-intensive fieldwork keeps a large proportion of labourers at home; in corn-growing villages, the majority of the young villagers left for jobs in urban areas.

12 1 mu ≈ 0.165 acre.

13 1 jin ≈ 1.102 pound.

14 Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

15 Shue, Vivienne, The Reach of the State (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Chan et al., Chan Village.

16 See Bernstein, Thomas P. and Lü, Xiaobo, “Taxation without representation,” The China Quarterly, No. 163 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Waldron, Scott, Brown, Colin and Longworth, John, “State sector reform and agriculture in China,” The China Quarterly, No. 186 (2006), pp. 277–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 25Google Scholar.