Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:00:24.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology in Communist China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Cheng Te-K'un
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Archaeology has a long history in traditional China where it served as the handmaiden of history, lexicography and geography, as well as preserver of art and literature. References to ancient material remains are common in the early Chinese literature. In the early fifth century b.c. Feng-hu-tzu, presumably after a study of early implements, proposed a four-stage sequence for the ancient period, each characterised by a weapon made of stone, jade, copper and iron, respectively. The grand historian of the second century B.C., Ssu-ma Ch'ien, made special efforts to visit as many ancient sites and monuments as possible to substantiate his records. In the second century a.d. Hsü Shen compiled a dictionary of 10,516 characters, many of which were drawn from ancient bronze and stone inscriptions. In the sixth century Li Tao-yuan wrote his commentaries on the Book of Rivers, which was fully documented with archaeological data. Throughout the ages many important discoveries were recorded and large numbers of ancient art objects and literature preserved. By the twelfth century Chinese archaeology had become a specialised subject, known as Chin-shih-hsueh, literally, a study of bronze and stone objects. A vast literature began to accumulate, reaching its height in the last two centuries.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 23 , September 1965 , pp. 67 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ch'uan-kuo Chi-pen Chien-she Kung-ch'eng-chung Ch'u-t'u Wen-wu Chan-lan T'u-lu (Archaeological Finds at Construction Sites), Shanghai, 1955Google Scholar.

2 See Museum, Nanking, Nanking Fu-chin K'ao-ku Pao-kao (Archaeological Reports on Sites around Nanking), Shanghai, 1952Google Scholar; Museum, Yunnan, The Ancient Cemetery of Shi-chai-shan, Tsin-ning, Yunnan, Peking, 1959Google Scholar; I-yu, Li, Nei-meng-ku Ch'u-t'u Wen-wu Hsuan-chi (Selected Cultural Relics from Inner Mongolia), Peking, 1963Google Scholar.

3 Lan, T'ang, Wu-sheng Ch'u-t'u Chung-yao Wen-wu Chan-lan T'u-lu (Illustrated catalogue of the Exhibition of the Important Cultural Relics from Five Provinces), Peking, 1958Google Scholar.

4 Wen-wu, Chan-k'ao Tzu-liao (Cultural Relics), Peking, 01–06 1950, pp. 79–80Google Scholar; July 1950, pp. 10–11.

5 yen-chiu, K'ao-ku so, Hui-hsien Fa-chueh Pao-kao (Reports of the Hui-hsien Excavation), Peking, 1956Google Scholar.

6 Wen-wu, August 1955, pp. 150–151 et seq.

7 K'ao-ku, August 1958, p. 12.

8 Institute of Archaeology and Pan-p'o Museum, Sian Pan-p'o (The Neolithic Village at Pan-p'o, Sian), Peking, 1963Google Scholar.

9 Published in Peking, 1962. See Te-k'un, Cheng, “New Light on Ancient China,” Antiquity, No. 38, 1964, pp. 179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 K'ao-ku, October 1959, p. 153.

11 Ibid. p. 514.

12 Wen-wu, September 1957, p. 20.

13 Chih-chui-tung-wu ti Yen-hua (Evolution of Vertebrates), Peking, 1955Google Scholar.

14 Peking Review, 1965, Vol. 13, p. 25Google Scholar.

15 Acta Palaeontologia Sinica; Vertebrate Palasiatica; and Palaeovertebrata et Palaeoanthropologia.

16 Tzeyang Palaeolithic Man, Peking, 1957Google ScholarPubMed; Report of the Excavation of Palaeolithic Sites at Tingtsun, Shansi, China, 1958; Kehe, 1962; Palaeoliths of Shanshi, 1961.

17 K'ao-ku, December 1959, p. 695.

18 Wen-wu, January–June 1950, p. 78.

19 Ibid. July 1950, pp. 1–102.

20 K'ao-ku T'ung-hsun, Peking, 1956Google Scholar.

21 K'ao-ku, June 1956, pp. 108–117 et seq.

22 Okladnikov, A. P., “The Soviet Far East in the Light of the Latest Achievements in Archaeology,” Problems of History, 01 1964Google Scholar.

23 Wen-wu, November 1950, pp. 1–106; December 1950, pp. 12–15; January 1951, pp. 64–84 et seq.

24 Ibid. June 1955, pp. 3–10; July 1955, pp. 27–59; March 1960, pp. 7–17.

25 Wen-wu, May 1955, pp. 12–14; June 1955, pp. 19–26; July 1955, pp. 65–66. Also K'ao-ku, February 1955, pp. 75–76; April 1955, pp. 01–04, 66–71; May 1955, pp. 1–8 et seq.

26 Wen-wu, March 1956, pp. 1–16.

27 Ibid. June 1957, pp. 3–7; July 1957, pp. 1–10.

28 Ibid. September 1957, pp. 1–64; October 1957, pp. 3–13.

29 K'ao-ku, December 1958, pp. 1–21.

30 Ibid. October 1958, pp. 23–29.

31 Ibid. October 1958, p. 16; January 1959, p. 7; March 1959, p. 126.

32 Wen-wu, 1958.

33 K'ao-ku, October 1964, p. 485; see Sian Pan-p'o, Peking, 1963Google Scholar; Excavations at Feng Hsi (Peking, 1962)Google Scholar.

34 K'ao-ku, January 1961, pp. 3–11.

35 Wen-wu, May 1963, pp. 32–34.

36 K'ao-ku, October 1964, pp. 485–497, 503. See also Te-k'un, Cheng, Archaeology in China, Vols. I, II, IIIGoogle Scholar, Supplement to Vol. I (5 vols. forthcoming).