Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T07:40:22.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Virtual School for Children in Out-of-Home Care: A Strategic Approach to Improving Their Educational Attainment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2015

Sonia Jackson
Sonia Jackson*
Affiliation:
Thomas Coram Research Unit, UCL-Institute of Education, London, UK
*
address for correspondence: Professor Emeritus Sonia Jackson, UCL-Institute of Education, 56 High Street, Thornbury, Bristol, UK, BS35 2AN. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In all countries where the evidence is available, the educational performance of children looked after away from home falls markedly below that of their peers. In the recent years this has become a subject of intense debate. Is it an inevitable consequence of the adversity they have suffered before coming into care, and only to be expected given the characteristics of their families of origin? Or does the care system itself bear some responsibility? This question is not simply one of academic interest. Longitudinal research on social exclusion has shown the strong association between low levels of education and negative adult outcomes which disproportionately affect those with a background in care. This paper argues that efforts to narrow the gap in achievement between children in public care and their home-based peers will meet with little success as long as the problem is only tackled at the individual level. In an attempt to bring about systemic change, the English government in 2006 introduced a new concept: the Virtual School for “looked after” children. The Virtual School encompasses as pupils all children and young people in a particular area who are in public care, but has no physical existence other than an office base. The children continue to attend their own schools, which are responsible for their progress. Initially a difficult concept to grasp, the model now seems to be fully accepted and all local authorities in England are legally required to appoint a Virtual School Head (VSH). The article reviews the limited available research and offers an illustrative case study. In conclusion, it suggests that the virtual school may be a model with potential to help raise the attainment of children in care in countries other than England.

Keywords

out-of-home carevirtual schoolsocial inclusioneducational disadvantageleaving careEuropean research
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 40 , Issue 4: OUT OF HOME CARE-REFLECTING ON THE PAST AND ENVISIONING FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS , December 2015 , pp. 327 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

All-Party Parliamentary Group. (2012). Education matters in care: A report by the independent cross-party inquiry into the educational attainment of looked after children in England. London: University and College Union (UCU).Google Scholar
Berridge, D. (2007). Theory and explanation in child welfare: Education and looked after children. Child and Family Social Work, 12 (1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, D. (2012). Reflections on child welfare research and the policy process: Virtual school heads and the education of looked after children. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, D., Henry, L., Jackson, S., & Turney, D. (2009). Evaluation of the virtual school head pilot. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Berridge, D., Henry, L., Jackson, S., & Turney, D. (2009). Looked after and learning: Evaluation of the Virtual School Head Pilot, Report No. RR144 www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Pate1/DCSFGoogle Scholar
Bombèr, L.M., & Hughes, D.A. (2013). Settling to learn: Why relationships matter in school. London: Worth.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. (2013). Cross-national understanding of the purpose of professional-child relationship: Towards a social pedagogical approach. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 2 (1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C., Connelly, G., & Jackson, S. (2015). Educating children and young people in care: Learning placements and caring schools. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Cameron, C., Jackson, S., Hauari, H., & Hollingworth, K. (2012). Continuing educational participation among children in care in five European countries: Some issues of social class. Journal of Education Policy, 27 (3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashmore, J., Paxman, M., & Townsend, M. (2007). The educational outcomes of young people 4–5 years after leaving care: An Australian perspective. Adoption and Fostering, 31 (1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, G. (2013). Improving the educational outcomes of looked after children in Scotland. In Jackson, S. (Ed.), Pathways through education for young people in care (pp. 101–115). London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar
DCSF. (2007). Care matters: Time for change. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
DCSF. (2010). Virtual school head toolkit. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
DfEE/DH. (2000). Guidance on the education of children in public care. London: Department for Education and Employment/Department of Health.Google Scholar
DfES. (2006). Care matters: Transforming the lives of children in care. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
DfE. (2014a). Children and Families Act. London: Department for Education (March 2014).Google Scholar
DfE. (2014b). Outcomes for children looked after by local authorities in England as at 31 March 2014. Available at www.gov.uk/government/statistics/outcomes-for-children-looked-after-by-local-authorities.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J. (2013). Supporting the educational transitions of looked after children at Key Stage 4: The role of virtual schools and designated teachers. Journal of Children's Services, 8 (12), 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher-Campbell, F. (1997). The education of children who are looked-After. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Flynn, R.J., Tessier, N.G., & Coulombe, D. (2013). Placement, protective and risk factors in the educational success of young people in care: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. European Journal of Social Work, 16 (1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, J. (2008). Developing inclusive education policy and practice for looked after children. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 7 (1), 60–70.Google Scholar
Francis, J. (2000). Investing in children's futures: enhancing the educational outcomes of ‘looked after’ children. Child & Family Social Work, 5 (1), 241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, K., Lundström, T., & Sallnäs, M. (2011). A comparison of Out-of-Home Care for Children and Young People in Sweden: Worlds Apart? Australian Social Work, 64 (4), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, P., Visser, J., & MacNab, N. (2008). Education and social exclusion. In Abrams, D., Christian, J., and Gordon, D. (eds), Multidisciplinary handbook of social exclusion research. Wiley: Chichester, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Höjer, I.et al. (2008). State of the art consolidated literature review: The educational pathways of young people from a public care background in five EU countries. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, K. (2012). Participation in social, leisure and informal learning activities among care leavers in England: Positive outcomes for educational participation. Child & Family Social Work, 17 (4), 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. (1987). The education of children in care. Bristol papers in applied social studies. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (2007). Care leavers, exclusion and access to higher education. In Abrams, D., Christian, J., & Gordon, D. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary handbook of social exclusion research (pp. 115–136). Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. (2010). Reconnecting care and education: From the children act 1989 to care Matters. Journal of Children's Services, 5 (3), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., Ajayi, S., & Quigley, M. (2005). Going to university from care: Final report of the By Degrees project. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (ed.) (2013). Introduction to Pathways through education for young people in care: Ideas from research and practice, London: British Association for Adoption & Fostering.Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2012). Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1107–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2014). Improving access to further and higher education for young people in care: European policy and practice. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Höjer, I. (2013). Prioritising education for children looked after away from home. European Journal of Social Work, 16 (1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., & Sachdev, D. (2001). Better education, better futures: Research, practice and the views of young people in public care. Ilford UK: Barnardos.Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Simon, A. (2006). The costs and benefits of educating children in care. In Chase, E., Simon, A., & Jackson, S. (Eds.), In Care and After: A Positive Perspective (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jensen, N.R. (2013). Action competence–a new trial aimed at social innovation in residential homes. European Journal of Social Work, 16 (1), 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, W. (2008). Understanding methods paradigms in an historical context: The case of social pedagogy. British Journal of Social Work, 38 (4), 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, P., Michell, D., & Wilson, J.Z. (2014). Young people transitioning from out-of-home care and access to higher education: A critical review of the literature. Children Australia, 39 (4), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendis, K. (2012). Exploring ways in which to support the education of children in care. Developing Practice, 33, 26.Google Scholar
Mendis, K. (2015). One size does not fit all: The educational needs of children in out-of-home care. Adoption and Fostering, 39 (2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Malo, S. (2013). Delayed educational pathways and risk of social exclusion: The case of young people from public care in Spain. European Journal of Social Work, 16 (1), 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofsted. (2012). The impact of virtual schools on the educational progress of looked after children. London: Office for Standards in Education.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, A.et al. (2013). Closing the gap: Investigating the barriers to educational achievement for looked after children. In Jackson, S. (Ed.), Pathways through education for young people in care: Ideas from research and practice (pp. 66–77). London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF).Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, A., Westerman, R., McNamara, P., & Mains, A. (2013). Closing the gap: Investigating the barriers to educational achievement for looked after children. In Jackson, S. (ed.), Pathways through education for young people in care: Ideas from research and practice, London: British Association for Adoption & Fostering. pp 66–77.Google Scholar
Parker, R., & Gorman, M. (2013). In Care, In school: Giving voice to children and young people in care. Jackson, In S. (Ed.), Pathways through education for young people in care: Ideas from research and practice (pp. 135–145). London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF).Google Scholar
Poyser, M. (2013). Is inclusion always best for young people in care? A view from the classroom. In Jackson, S. (Ed.), Pathways through education for young people in care (pp. 129–134). London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar
Racz, A., & Korintus, M. (2013). Enabling young people with a care background to stay in education in Hungary: Accommodation with conditions and support. European Journal of Social Work, 16 (1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, A., & Owen, C. (2006). Outcomes for children in care: what do we know? In Chase, E., Simon, A., and Jackson, S. (eds), In care and after: A positive perspective, London: Routledge. pp. 26–43.Google Scholar
Simpson, R.J. (2012). The virtual school for cared for children: An exploration of its current and future role in raising pupils’ academic attainment and achievement and promoting emotional wellbeing. Manchester: University of Manchester School of Education (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Smith, L.J., & McLean, S. (2013). Issues and challenges for service agencies in monitoring educational outcomes for children in out-of-home care. Children Australia, 38, 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit (2003). A better education for children in care. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
Stein, M., & Munro, E. (eds). (2008). Young people's transitions from care to adulthood: International research and practice. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Tilbury, C., Creed, P., Buys, N., Osmond, J., & Crawford, M. (2014). Making a connection: School engagement of young people in care. Child and Family Social Work, 19, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, M., & Köngeter, S. (2012). Education in residential care and in school: A social-pedagogical perspective on the educational attainment of young women leaving care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar