Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T23:32:24.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The silent minority: The voice of the child in family law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Amanda Shea Hart
Amanda Shea Hart*
Affiliation:
Centacare Adelaide, 33 Wakefield Street, Adelaide, SA 5000. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Family law in Australia is an important and unique jurisdiction that directly impacts upon the well-being and future family relationships of children whose families are in dispute over post separation parenting arrangements. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that children have the right to participate in decisions that directly affect them. But there are many barriers and tensions to children's participation in the jurisdiction of family law in Australia. Decisions said to be in the child's ‘best interests’ are influenced by value judgments and beliefs that are informed by dominant western discourses on the needs and competencies of children. In practice under the Family Law Reform Act 1995 children remain marginalised without an effective voice. Failure to hear the voice of the child is of special concern for children who have been traumatised by exposure to family violence and ongoing conflict. It is important to develop new understandings about children and the importance of giving children a voice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , 2003 , pp. 31 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altobelli, T. (2000) Parents in the Trenches: Children in the Crossfire, paper presented at ‘Children in the Crossfire of Divorce’ conference. Legal and Accounting Management Seminars Ply Ltd, NSW.Google Scholar
Australian Family Law Act 1975 (Cwlth), Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission & Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) Seen and Heard: Priority for Children in the Legal Process, Report No.84, Aiken Press Pty. Ltd. Google Scholar
Bowen, D. (2000) ‘What Children Say, What We Think They Mean’: Children's Wishes in Residence and Contact Disputes, paper presented at ‘Children in the Crossfire of Divorce’ conference, Legal and Accounting Management Seminars Pty Ltd, NSW.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Sheehan, R., Frederico, M. & Hewitt, L. (2001) Resolving Family Violence to Children: The Evaluation of Project Magellan, A Pilot Project for Managing Residence and Contact Disputes when Allegations of Child Abuse Have Been Made, Family Violence and Family Court Research Program, Monash University, Victoria.Google Scholar
Byas, A. (2003) Family Law: Old Shadows and New Directions, paper presented at 8th Australian Institute of Families Studies Conference, 12-14 February, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2002) ‘Working with Children in Family Mediation’, Psychotherapy in Australia, Vol. 18, No.4, August.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. & Scott, S. (1995) ‘Children's Wishes, Children's Burdens’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol.17, No.3, pp.337–354.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, S., Turner, J. & Foreman, L. (2000) Disrupted Families: The Law, The Federation Press, NSW.Google Scholar
Chisolm, R. (1996) Case Study Discussion Points, National Seminar Series on the Family Law Reform Act 1995, March.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Government (1993) Family Law Act 1975: Directions for Amendment: Government Response to the Report of Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act, December, Canberra.Google Scholar
Counsel, C. & Kelly, L. (2000) Children in the Crossfire of Divorce, ‘Current Issues’ conference paper, LAAMS Publication, Sydney.Google Scholar
Dewar, J. (2001) ‘Out of the Maze: Pathways to the Future for Families Experiencing Separation’, Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 15, No.3, November, pp. 175–179.Google Scholar
Dickey, A. (1997) Family Law, Third Edition, LBC Information Services.Google Scholar
Donovan, T. (1997) The Edge of the Possible: Intelligence of a New Era, Business and Professional Publishing, Warriewood, NSW.Google Scholar
Edleson, J. (1999) ‘Children's witnessing of adult domestic violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol 14, No 8, pp.839–868.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, J. (1994) ‘The Interests of the Child and the Child's Wishes: the Role of Dynamic Self-Determination’, in The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, Parental Authority and State Power, ed Alstron, P., Clarendon Press, London.Google Scholar
Family Law Council (1992) Patterns of Parenting After Separation, AGPS, April.Google Scholar
Family Law Council (2000) The Best Interests of the Child? The Interaction of Public and Private Law in Australia, Discussion Paper No.2, October, Canberra.Google Scholar
Family Law Pathways Advisory Group (2001) Out of the maze: Pathways to the future for families experiencing separation, Commonwealth of Australia, ACT.Google Scholar
Family Law Reform Act 1995, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Family Violence Committee (2003) Family Violence Consultation Report, Family Court of Australia, June, Canberra.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission & Australian Law Reform Commission (1996) Speaking for Ourselves: Children and the Legal Process, Issues Paper No. 18, March, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Jaffe, P., Poisson, S. & Cunningham, A. (2002) “Domestic Violence and High-Conflict Divorce: Critical Issues for Mental Health, Social Science and Legal Professionals’, in Children Exposed to Marital Violence, eds Holden, G., Geffner, R. & Jouriles, E., American Psychological Association, Washington.Google Scholar
James, A. & Prout, A. (1990) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
Kaye, M. & Tolmie, J. (1998) ‘Fathers' Rights Groups in Australia and Their Engagement with Family Law’, Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol.19, No.35, pp. 19–67.Google Scholar
Kaye, M., Stubbs, J. & Tolmie, J. (2003) Negotiating Child Residence and Contact Arrangements Against a Background of Domestic Violence, Research Report No. 1, June, Families, Law and Social Policy Research Unit, Griffith University, Queensland.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. (1993) ‘Current Research on Children's Post Divorce Adjustment: No Simple Answers’, Family and Conciliation Courts Review, Vol.31, No. 1, pp.29–49.Google Scholar
Kennedy, I. (1996) ‘Family Law Reform Act 1995: New Laws for Children’. Australian Family Lawyer, Vol.11, No.3, June.Google Scholar
Kordos, V. (2000) Child Representatives, paper presented at ‘Children in the Crossfire of Divorce’ conference, LAAMS Publications, NSW.Google Scholar
Koverola, C. & Heger, A. (2003) ‘Responding to Children Exposed to Domestic Violence: Research Informing Practice and Policy’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol.18, No.4, April, pp.331–337.Google Scholar
Landerkin, H. (1997) Custody disputes in the Provincial Court of Alberta: A new Judicial dispute resolution model, thesis for Master of Judicial Studies in Trial/Juvenile and Family Court Judges, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Law, I. (1997) ‘Attention Deficit Disorders: Therapy with a Shoddily Built Construct’, in Narrative Therapies with Children and Adolescents, eds Smith, C. & Nyland, D., Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ludbrook, R. (1995) Youthism: Age Discrimination and Young People, National Children's and Youth Law Centre, Sydney.Google Scholar
Macvean, A. (1998) Presenting Children's Issues to the Court: Some Reflections, paper presented at the Third National Family Court Conference, 20-24 October, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Maxwell, G. (1995) ‘Children: The forgotten victims of family violence’, paper presented at the Third National Family Court Conference, 20-24 October, Melbourne.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. (1997) A Model of Child Focused Mediation, Pilot Research Project, Strategic Partners, Melbourne.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. (2000) ‘Child-Inclusive Divorce Mediation: Report on a Qualitative Research Study’, Mediation Quarterly, Vol.18, No.1, Fall, pp.55–69.Google Scholar
Moloney, L. (2001) ‘Do Fathers ‘Win’ or do Mother's ‘Lose’? A Preliminary Analysis of Closely Contested Parenting judgments in the Family Court of Australia'’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol.15, pp.363–396.Google Scholar
Morosini, D. (2000) Current Issues, paper presented at ‘Children in the Crossfire of Divorce’ conference, Legal and Accounting Management Seminars Pty Ltd, NSW.Google Scholar
Rayner, M. (1997) ‘In the Child's Best Interests? Contact and Children's Rights’, Australian Family Lawyer, Vol.12, No.1, Winter, pp.1–7.Google Scholar
Rayner, M. (2001) ‘Taking Children Seriously’, Rights Now, June, pp.12–13.Google Scholar
Redman, J. (1997) ‘The Voice of the Child in the Family Court’, The Law Society of South Australia Bulletin, April, pp.8–15.Google Scholar
Rendell, K., Rathus, Z. & Lynch, A. (2000) An Unacceptable Risk. A Report on Child Contact Arrangements Where There is Violence in the Family, Abuse Free Contact Group, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Rhoades, H. (2000) ‘Child Law Reforms in Australia: A Shifting Landscape’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol.12, No.2, pp.117–133.Google Scholar
Rhoades, H., Graycar, R. & Harrison, M. (2000) The Family Law Reform Act 1995: The First Three Years, University of Sydney and the Family Court of Australia, December.Google Scholar
Sanson, A & Lewis, V. (2001) ‘Children and Their Family Contexts’, Family Matters, No. 59, Winter, pp.4–9.Google Scholar
Saunders, B. & Goddard, C. (2001) The Textual Abuse of Childhood in the English- Speaking World: The Contribution of Language to the Denial of Children's Rights, Child Abuse and Family Violence Research Unit, Monash University, Victoria.Google Scholar
Sawicki, J. (1996) ‘Feminism, Foucault, and ‘Subjects’ of Power and Freedom’ in Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault, ed Heckman, S., The Pennsylvania State Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (1989) Feminism and the Power of the Law, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (2001) Children's Voices, paper presented at 25th Anniversary Family Court of Australia Conference ‘Justice, Courts & Community: The Continuing Challenge’, 26-29 July, Sydney.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (2002) ‘From Children's Shoes to Children's Voices’, Family Court Review, Vol.40, No.3, July, pp.307–319.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Taylor, N. (2003) Rethinking Children's Involvement in Decision: Making After Parental Separation, paper presented at the Eighth Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference ‘Steps Forward for Families: Research, Practice and Policy’, Melbourne, February.Google Scholar
Staindl, P. (2000) Children's Contact Issues: How Hard to Push, paper presented at ‘Children in the Crossfire of Divorce’ conference, Legal and Accounting Management Seminars Pty Ltd, NSW.Google Scholar
Taylor, N. (1998) ‘The Voice of Children in Family Law’, Children's Legal Rights Journal, Vol.18, No.1, Winter, pp.2–11.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. & O'Kane, C. (1998) ‘When Children's Wishes and Feelings Clash With Their “Best Interests'”, International Journal of Children's Rights, Vol.6, No.2, pp.137–154.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, J. & Kelly, J. (1980) Surviving the Breakup: How Children and Parents Cope with Divorce, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Wise, S. (2003) Family Structure, Child Outcomes and Environmental Mediators. An Overview of the Development in Diverse Families Study, Research paper No.30, January, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Woodland, B. (1999) ‘Sterilization of young women with intellectual disabilities: “Best interests” and “proper” woman in legal analysis’, Women Against Violence, No. 7, December, pp.20–31.Google Scholar