Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:47:07.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-engaging separated fathers with their children after contact has broken down

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Andrew King  and
Ross Fletcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores how separated fathers, who may have limited or no contact with their children, can be understood from a non-deficit perspective (Fleming 2002; Hawkins & Dollahite 1997; King 2000, 2001, 2005; King, Sweeney & Fletcher 2004). It describes how the generative fathering framework is used as a model to assist separated fathers to rebuild their connection with their children. The paper also examines parent/child contact time from a child focused perspective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , 2007 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altobelli, T. (2006) ‘Parenting after separation: The Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006’, Law Society Journal, Vol. 44, No.6, July, 47–49.Google Scholar
Barry, R. (2007) The Law Handbook, 10th edition, Redfern Legal Centre, Sydney.Google Scholar
Bryan, M. (1997) The Prodigal Father, Three Rivers Press, USA.Google Scholar
Child Support Agency (2005) Being Connected, brochure, <http://csa.gov.au/services/pdf/bc.pdf>, viewed 15/8/07.,+viewed+15/8/07.>Google Scholar
Erikson, E.H. (1975) Life history and the historical moment, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Family Planning Association (1998) Young Fathers Video, Family Planning Association.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. (2002) ‘Just the two of us: The involvement of fathers in building stronger families’, Developing Practice; Winter.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A.J. & Dollahite, D.C. (eds) (1997) Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives, Sage Publications, California.Google Scholar
Killeen, D. & Lehmann, J. (2004) ‘Non-residential fathers and their support needs’, Children Australia, Vol. 29, No. 4, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (2000) ‘Working with fathers: The non-deficit perspective’, Children Australia, Vol. 25, No. 3, 23–27.Google Scholar
King, A. (2001) ‘Engaging fathers in group work’, Developing Practice, Winter.Google Scholar
King, A. (2005) ‘The “quiet revolution” amongst men: Developing the practice of working with men in family relationships’, Children Australia, Vol. 30, No. 2, 33–37.Google Scholar
King, A., Sweeney, S. & Fletcher, R. (2004) ‘A checklist for organisations working with men’, Developing Practice, December.Google Scholar
Kruk, E. (1993) Divorce and disengagement: Patterns of fatherhood within and beyond marriage, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax.Google Scholar
Mensline Australia (2006) Monthly status report, November 2006, http://www.menslineaus.org.au/Upload/Docs/65.doc, viewed 15/6/07.Google Scholar
Smyth, B. (2004) ‘Post-separation fathering: What does Australian research tells us?’, Journal of Family Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, 20–49.Google Scholar
Smyth, B. (2005) ‘Time to rethink time?’, Family Matters, No. 71, Winter.Google Scholar
van Ryke, P. (2004) ‘Valuing men, valuing relationships’, report on the 2004 Men and Family Relationship Conference, Burnside.Google Scholar