Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:11:04.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Providing Care for Children: How Service Providers Define and Apply “Care” in Contemporary South Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

Katie Barclay
Affiliation:
ARC Centre for Excellence in the History of Emotions, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Dee Michell
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Clemence Due*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Clemence Due, School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5001. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

While a wide array of service providers and academic scholars apply the use of “care” in their work, the concept of “care” itself remains largely undefined. This has widespread implications for applied work with children and young people (CYP), particularly since institutions such as schools and non-governmental organisations are increasingly being expected to care for or about children. In this paper, we use thematic analysis to report on interviews with representatives from four service providers and organisations responsible for the care of children. In our analysis, we explore both how care is defined by these organisations, and the implications for practice when working with CYP.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, M. (2012). Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, V. (2007). Young people's views of children's rights and advocacy services: A case for caring advocacy? Child Abuse Review, 16 (3), 140152.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risky society: Towards a new modernity. Munich: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998). On the way to a post-familial family: From a community of need to elective affinities. Theory, Culture & Society, 15 (3), 5370.Google Scholar
Beresford, P. (2010). Re-examining relationships between experience, knowledge, ideas and research. Social Work & Society, 8 (1), 620.Google Scholar
Blazek, M., & Kraftl, P. (Eds.) (2015). Children's emotions in policy and practice: Mapping and making spaces of childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. L., Buckley, L., Sheehan, M., & Shochet, I. (2011). The impact of school connectedness on violent behavior, transport risk-taking behavior, and associated injuries in adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 399410.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. L., Buckley, L., Sheehan, M., & Shochet, I. (2013). School-based programs for increasing connectedness and reducing risk behavior: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 25 (1), 95114.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1993). Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality and Society, 5 (2), 203230.Google Scholar
Community Affairs References Committee. (2004). Forgotten Australians: A report on Australians who experienced institutional or out of home care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, B. (2010). Concepts of adversity, risk, vulnerability, and resilience: A discussion in the context of the ‘child protection system’. Social Policy & Society, 9 (2), 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dare, L., & O'Donovan, M. (2002). Good practice in caring for young children with special needs. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.Google Scholar
Department for Education & Childhood Development. (2014). Innovative community action networks [brochure]. Adelaide: SA Department for Education & Childhood Development.Google Scholar
Due, C., Riggs, D. W., & Augoustinos, M. (2014). Research with children of migrant and refugee background: A review of child-centered research. Child Indicators Research, 7, 209227.Google Scholar
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furedi, F. (2002). Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts might be best for your child. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, R. (2000). The key role of social workers in promoting the well-being of children in state care-a neglected dimension of reforming policies. Children & Society, 14, 267276.Google Scholar
Government of South Australia, Office of the Guardian for Children and Young People (2013). Statistics about children in care - June 2012. Retrieved from http://www.gcyp.sa.gov.au/2013/03/statistics-about-children-in-care-june-2012/.Google Scholar
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, J. L., & Bromfield, L. (2015). Evidence for the efficacy of the child advocacy centre model: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. Retrieved from http://tva.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/05/12/1524838015585319.abstract.Google Scholar
Holland, S. (2010). Looked after children and the ethic of care. British Journal of Social Work, 40 (6), 16641680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M. L., Gira, E., & Poertner, J. (2005). Moving best practice to evidence-based practice in child welfare. Families in Society, 86 (2), 244250.Google Scholar
Kinniburgh, K., Blaustein, M., Spinazzola, J., & van der Kolk, B. (2005). Attachment, self-regulation, and competency. A comprehensive intervention framework for children with complex trauma. Psychiatric Annals, 35 (5), 424430.Google Scholar
Kryger, N. (2004). Childhood and new learning in a Nordic context. In Brembeck, H., Johansson, B., & Kampmann, J. (Eds.), Beyond the competent child: Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies (pp. 153176). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, R., & Robinson, F. (Eds.) (2011). Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care. Vancouver/Toronto: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, I., & Stevens, I. (2006). Balancing rights and risks: The impact of health and safety regulations on the lives of children in residential care. Journal of Social Work, 6 (3), 239254.Google Scholar
Monchinski, T. (2010). Education in hope: Critical pedagogies and the ethics of care. New York: Peter Laing.Google Scholar
Newbigging, K., & Thomas, N. (2011). Good practice in social care for refugee and asylum-seeking children. Child Abuse Review, 20, 374390.Google Scholar
Nickerson, A., Hopson, L. M., & Steinke, C. M. (2011). School connectedness in community and residential treatment schools: The influence of gender, grades, and engagement in treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 829837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noddings, N. (1982). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of CA Press.Google Scholar
Pratesi, A., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011). ‘Not-so-usual families’: Overlaps and divergences in the practices of care within disabled and same-sex families. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 37 (2), 243262.Google Scholar
Raghuram, P. (in press). Dis-locating care ethics? Place, race and geography. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies.Google Scholar
Scheer, M. (2012). Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory, 51 (2), 190220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scourfield, J., & Welsh, I. (2003). Risk, reflexivity and social control in child protection: New times or same old story? Critical Social Policy, 23 (3), 398420.Google Scholar
Shochet, I., & Smith, C. L. (2014). A prospective study investigating the links among classroom environment, school connectedness, and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 51 (5), 480492.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2011). Producing governable subjects: Images of childhood old and new. Childhood, 19 (1), 2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. (2010). Discussant piece: Linking, bridging and bonding: The importance of a psycho-social perspective for children in public care. Children's Geographies, 8 (3), 261264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T., & Mills, R. (2014). ‘Signs of safety’ practice at the health and children's social care interface. Practice: Social Work in Action, 26 (1), 2336.Google Scholar
Steckley, L., & Smith, M. (2011). Care ethics in residential child care: A different voice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5 (2), 181195.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. (2015). Reconfiguring care and family in the era of the ‘outsourced self’. Journal of Family Studies, 21 (3), 208217.Google Scholar
Timimi, S. (2014). Pathological child psychiatry and the medicalization of childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1994). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar