Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:13:13.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘Only Child’ as an Issue in Adoption Policy: Myth & Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Neither State nor private adoption agencies in Australia give preference to childless applicants over applicants who already have one child. This policy is presumed to be in ‘the best interest of the child’, and is based on the belief that being an only child leads to maladjustment. Empirical evidence indicates, however, that in general only children are in fact better adjusted than children from larger families. Consequently, not only has the existing policy no substance but also it denies natural justice to the childless couples who have to wait to start their adoptive family.

In the past two decades there has been a complete reversal of the supply/demand situation in the area of child adoption in Australia. At present, the number of children available for adoption is so small relative to the number of potential adopters, that approved applicants have to wait for up to eight years in N.S.W. before they can expect to have a child allotted to them. The length of this waiting period seems excessive not only in terms of the applicants’ expectations but also in terms of ordinary common sense values of the general community. If the situation is to be remedied, there is a need for a more flexible adoption policy suited to the prevailing social circumstances. A facet of this policy, which could shorten the waiting period possibly by half if adapted to the existing situation, is the proviso that all other things being equal childless applicants are given no preference over applicants who already have a natural or adopted child.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (1979) Birth Expectations of Married Women. Canberra: A.B.S.Google Scholar
Bayer, A.E. (1966) Birth order and college attendance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 23, 484.Google Scholar
Bayer, A.E. (1967) Birth order and attainment of the doctorate: A test of economic hypotheses. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 540550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. (1974) Can we believe recent data on birth expectation in the United States? Demography, 11, 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, M.E. (1944) Relationships between social success, family size, socio-economic home background, and intelligence among school children in grades 3 to 5. Sociometry, 7, 2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossard, J.H.S. and Boll, E.S. (1956) The Large Family System: An Original Study in the Sociology of Family Behaviour. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M.O. (1969) A search for systematic personality differentiate of the only child in young adulthood. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 114, 4145.Google Scholar
Conners, C.K. (1963) Birth order and needs for affiliation. Journal of Personality, 31, 409416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corfield, V.K. (1968) The utilization of guidance clinic facilities in Alberta 1961. Alber Psychologist, 9, 1545.Google Scholar
Cutts, N.E. and Moseley, N. (154) The Only Child. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Davis, E. (1937) The mental and linguistic superiority of only girls. Child Development, 8, 139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, D.T. (1945) Are only children different? Journal of Educational Psychology, 36, 297302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falbo, T. (1976) Does the only child grow up miserable? Psychology Today, 9, 65.Google Scholar
Falbo, T. (1976a) Folklore and the Only Child: A Reassessment. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
Falbo, T. (1977) The only child: a review. Journal of Individual Psychology, 33, 4761.Google ScholarPubMed
Falbo, T. (1978) Only children and interpersonal behaviour: an experimental and survey study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 244253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, H. (1971) The effects of children on the family. In Michel, A. (Ed.), Family Issues of Employed Women in Europe and America. Leiden, Neth: Brill.Google Scholar
Feldman, G. (1978) The only child as a separate entity: Differences between only females and other firstborn females. Psychological Reports, 42, 107110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewirtz, J.L. and Gewirtz, H.B. (1965) Stimulus conditions, infant behaviours and social learning in four Israeli child-rearing environments; A preliminary report illustrating differences in environment and behaviour between ‘only’ and ‘youngest’ child. In: Foss, B.M. (Ed.) Determinants of Infant Behaviour III. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Guildford, R.B. and Worcester, D.A. (1930) A comparative study of the only and non-only child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 38, 411426.Google Scholar
Hawke, S. and Knox, D. (1977) One Child by Choice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hawke, S.and Knox, D. (1978) The one-child family: A new life-style. The Family Coordinator, 27, 215219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, J.E. (1962) The Psychology of Adolescence. Boston: Hough Google Scholar
Howe, M.G. and Madgett, M.E. (1975) Mental health problems associated with the only child. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 20, 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, D. and Wilson, K. (1978) The difference between having one and two children. The Family Coordinator, 27, 2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J. (1978) Family structure as a factor in the adjustment of adopted children. British Journal of Social Work, 8, 327337.Google Scholar
Kurth, E. and Schmidt, E. (1964) Multidimensional examination of stuttering children. Problme und Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 12, 4958.Google Scholar
Lees, J.P. and Stewart, A.H. (1957) Family or sibship position and scholastic ability. Sociological Review, 5, 173190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paraskevopoulos, J.N. and Kirk, S.A. (1969) The Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the Revised Illinois Test of Psycholinguists Abilities. Urbana: University of Minois Press.Google Scholar
Pulvino, C.J. and Lupton, P.E (1978) Superior students: Family size, birth order and intellectual ability. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 212216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, B.C. and Feldman, H. (1970) Marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, P.C. (1974) Behaviour in public places: Comparison of couples accompanied and unaccompanied by children. Journal of Marriage and Family Living, 36, 750755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, H. (1966) Relationships of ordinal position to affiliation and achievement motives: direction and generality. Journal of Personality, 34, 467479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, A.S. (1972) Family development in a changing world. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 10571066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, R.G. (1973) Longitudinal data relating marriage satisfaction and having a child. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35, 604606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Council of Research in Education (1933) The Intelligence of Scottish Children: A National Survey of an Age Group. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Scottish Council for Research in Education (1983) The Intelligence of Scottish Children: A National Survey of an Age Group. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Scottish Council for Research in Education (1953) Social Implications of the 1947 Scottish Mental Survey. London: University London Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, E.S., Clare, J.E., and Westoff, C.F. (1956) Social and psychological factors affecting fertility. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 34, 160177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton-Smith, B. and Rosenberg, B.G. (1970) The Sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (1950) Intelligence and fertility: the Scottish 1947 survey. Eugenics Review, 41, 163170.Google Scholar
Thompson, V.D. (1974) Family size: implicit policies and assumed psychological outcomes. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 93124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuckman, J. and Regan, R.A. (1967) Size of family and behavioural problems in children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 111, 151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar