Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:00:45.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Whose ‘Best Interests’?: Some Mothers' Experiences of Child Welfare Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Jan Mason
Jan Mason*
Affiliation:
Institute of Higher Education
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resume

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reports on a small study in the south west region of Sydney, in which mothers discussed their experiences as recipients of child welfare interventions for alleged child abuse.

The research methodology is within a feminist framework, utilising qualitative data and placing importance on the impact of the implementation specific public policy on aspects of private functioning.

Data was obtained from focused interviews conducted by students on placement. The analysis highlights major themes of women's experiences of service delivery, using their own words. Themes concern feelings of powerlessness, factors determining the perception of interventions as ‘helpful’ or otherwise and issues of rights to information and access.

The findings of this study are considered in relation to feminist analysis of ‘mothering’ and State intervention; previous research on recipient experiences of service delivery and implications for future policy development and research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , 1989 , pp. 4 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

Beyer, M., and Mlyniec, M., (1986) Lifelines to Biological Parents. Their effect on Termination of Parental Rights and Permanence. In Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 20 (2), Summer, 1986.Google Scholar
Brown, C., (1986) Child Abuse Parents Speaking. Bristol SAUS, Working Paper 63, cited in N. Parton, 1988.Google Scholar
Burden, D., and Gottlieb, N., (1987) The Women Client, London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Corby, B., (1987) Working with Child Abuse: Social Work Practice and the Child Abuse System, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, cited in Parton, N., 1988.Google Scholar
Fanshell, D., and Shinn, E., (1978) Children in Foster Care, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Fernandez, E., (1986) Children at Risk Separated from Natural Parents: An Analysis of the Placement Decision. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress on Child Abuse. Sydney 11-14 August, 1986. Fox L.M., (1982) Two Value Positions in Recent Child Care Law and Practice. In British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1982.Google Scholar
Hepworth, P., (1985) Hundreds and Thousands.Putting Child Abuse in Context. The Social Worker, Vol. 53(4) Winter, 1985.Google Scholar
Maas, H.S., Engler, R.E., (1959) Children in Need of Parents, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
McCotter, D., (1981) Children in Limbo, Western Australia: Department for Community Welfare.Google Scholar
Parton, N., (1988) The Current State of Child Abuse, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Pelton, L.H., (1980) Child Abuse and Neglect: The Myth of Classlessness. In Cook, J.V., and Bowles, R.T., (eds.), (1981), Child Abuse, Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Polansky, N., (1981) Damaged Parents. An Anatomy of Child Neglect. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reinharz, S., (1983) Experiental Analysis, in Bowles, G., and Duelli-Klein, R., (eds.), Theories of Women's Studies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wilson, E., (1983) Feminism and Social Policy. In Loney, M., Boswell, D., and Clarke, J., Social Policy and Social Welfare (1983) England: Open University.Google Scholar