Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:17:19.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If having child-centred policy is the answer, what's the question?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Max Liddell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that having child-centred policy is not the straightforward matter it might seem. After presenting some historical snap-shots to demonstrate that children have frequently been the victims of policies aimed at addressing needs or perceived problems which are not child-centred, the author argues that contemporary policies frequently leave out significant variables, and the impact of culture is one of these. Focusing on the Australian-Asian region, the author notes the dominance of family and community over individual rights in many countries in our region. The likelihood is that family and children's services in Asian countries will conceptualise services to families and children in non-western ways, in spite of the fact that the principles underlying child protection which they espouse are frequently western in orientation (that is, they have a child's rights focus). Using these insights as a lens through which to look back at Australia, it is possible to see Australia as having ‘cultural’ traditions which also value family and community over the rights of children. It is argued in conclusion that future policy needs to take such realities more firmly into account, and given the increasing presence of and influence of cultures with a family-centred focus in Australia, greater attention also is needed to our international context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 35 , Issue 2: SPECIAL ISSUE: Adoption, fostering, permanent care and beyond: Re-thinking policy and practice on out-of-home care for children in Australia , 2010 , pp. 29 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu Baker, K. & Dwairy, M. (2003) ‘Cultural norms versus state law in treating incest: A suggested model for Arab families’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 109–123.Google Scholar
Chakkarath, P. (2005) ‘What can Western psychology learn from Indigenous psychologies? – Lessons from Hindu psychology’, in Friedlmeier, W., Chakkarath, P. & Schwarz, B. (eds.) Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research to the social sciences, Howie: The Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Creighton, S. (2006) Prevalence and incidence of child abuse: International comparisons, London: NSPCC Research Department.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (2009) ‘A comparative study of measures for children in conflict with the law in Goa and Singapore’, International Social Work, 52, 3, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrudin, A. & Durin, E. (2009) ‘Family characteristics and traumatic consequences associated with the duration and frequency of sexual assault,’ Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 3, 36–50.Google Scholar
Freymond, N. & Cameron, G. (eds.) (2006) Towards positive systems of child and family welfare: International comparisons of child protection, family service and community caring systems, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, S. & Kamerman, S. (2009) ‘A global review of new social risks and responses for children and their families’, Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 3, 1.21.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (ed.) (1997) Combating child abuse: International perspectives and trends, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hearn, J., Poso, T., Smith, C., White, S. & Korpinen, J. (2004) ‘What is child protection? Historical and methodological issues in comparative research on lastensuojelu/child protection’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 28–41.Google Scholar
Kamerman, S., Neuman, M., Waldfogel, J. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003) Social policies, family types and child outcomes in selected OECD countries, OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers No. 6.Google Scholar
Khoo, E., Hyvonen, U. & Nygren, L. (2002) ‘Child welfare or child protection: Uncovering Swedish and Canadian orientations to social intervention in child maltreatment’, Qualitative Social Work, 1, 4.Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Law, P. (2009) ‘Perceptions of sexual violence against women in Asian American communities’, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 10, 2, 3–25.Google Scholar
Liddell, Margaret (2003) Advantaged or disadvantaged by legislative change? PhD Thesis, Melbourne: RMIT University.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max (1993) ‘Child welfare and care in Australia: Understanding the past to influence the future’, in Goddard, C. & Carew, R. (eds.), Responding to children: Child welfare practice, chapter 3, Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max (2003) Protecting children or reluctant parenting: Themes in child welfare history in Victoria from 1970 to 2000, PhD Thesis, Melbourne: Monash University.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max, Donegan, T., Goddard, C. & Tucci, J. (2006) The state of child protection: Australian child welfare and child protection developments 2005, Melbourne: National Research Centre for the Prevention of Child Abuse and the Australian Childhood Foundation.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max & Liddell, Margaret (2000) ‘Homogenising Australia's child protection laws: Will the cream still rise to the top?’ Children Australia, 25, 2, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, N. & Ong, D. (2007) ‘Why the Child Abduction Protocol Negotiations should not deflect Singapore from acceding to the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention ’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 216–239.Google Scholar
May-Chahal, C., Bertotti, T., DiBlasio, P., Cerezo, M., Gerard, M., Grevot, A., Lamers, F., McGrath, K., Thorpe, D., Thyen, U. & Al-Hamade, A. (2006) ‘Child maltreatment in the family: A European perspective’, European Journal of Social Work, 9, 1, 3–20.Google Scholar
Mostafa, G. (2007) ‘Correcting the image of Islam and Muslims in the West: Challenges and opportunities for Islamic universities and organizations’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 27, 3, 371–386.Google Scholar
Ng, G. (2008), ‘EDITORIAL: The essence and elements of Chinese culture: Implications for cross-cultural competence in social work practice’, China Journal of Social Work, 1, 3, 205–207.Google Scholar
Nybom, J. (2005) ‘Visibility and “child view” in the assessment process of social work: Cross-national comparison’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 14, 315–325.Google Scholar
Qiao, D. & Chan, Y. (2008) ‘Myths of child abuse in China: Findings based on a qualitative study in Beijing’, China Journal of Social Work, 1, 3, 266–278.Google Scholar
Segal, U. (1999) ‘Children are abused in eastern countries: A look at India’, International Social Work, 42, 1, 239–52.Google Scholar
Sharma, B & Gupta, M. (2004) ‘Child abuse in Chandigarh, India, and its implications’, Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 11, 248–256.Google Scholar
Simkhada, P. (2008) ‘Life histories and survival strategies amongst sexually trafficked girls in Nepal’, Children and Society, 22, 235–248.Google Scholar
Tseng, W. & Hsu, J. (1970) ‘Chinese culture, personality formation and mental illness’, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 16, 5, 5–14.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2003) Violence against children in Nepal, Pulchowk, UNICEF.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2009) Progress for children: A report card on child protection, UNICEF.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, J. (1998) The future of child protection: How to break the cycle of abuse and neglect, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar